Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Steve Lerman

Values in Mathematics Education

  • Alan Bishop
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_160-2

Introduction

Values are a significant feature of education in any field, but it is only recently that values in mathematics education have been considered significant, or even recognized. This entry provides a historical perspective to the growing relevance of values in mathematics education. It also illustrates how different researchers have addressed different aspects of values depending on their theoretical and educational foci.

One focus has values being addressed as a characteristic of the person, which approaches values as a psychological construct. It builds on the research in mathematics education which explores values as related to learners’ and teachers’ attitudes, beliefs, and affect generally.

The other main research focus conceptualizes values as a sociocultural construct and is more concerned with the sociocultural context of mathematics education in which values are observed and negotiated. This approach builds on the relevant historical, cultural, and philosophical...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bishop AJ (1988) Mathematical enculturation. Springer/Kluwer, Dordrecht/HollandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop AJ, FitzSimons GE, Seah WT, Clarkson PC (2001) Do teachers implement their intended values in mathematics classrooms? In: Heuvel-Panhuizen M (ed) Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht, pp 169–176Google Scholar
  3. Bishop AJ, Gunstone D, Clarke B, Corrigan D (2006) Values in mathematics and science education: researchers’ and teachers’ views on the similarities and differences. Learn Math 26:7–11Google Scholar
  4. Kluckhohn C (1962) Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: an exploration in definition and classification. In: Parsons T, Shils EA (eds) Toward a general theory of action. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, pp 388–433Google Scholar
  5. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB (1964) Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals: Handbook 2: affective domain. Longmans, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Kroeber AL, Kluckhohn C (1952) Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Peabody Museum Papers, vol 47 (1). Peabody museum of american archaeology and ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Lancy DF (1983) Cross-cultural studies in cognition and mathematics. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. McConatha JT, Schnell F (1995) The confluence of values: implications for educational research and policy. Educ Pract Theory 17(2):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McLeod DB (1989) Beliefs, attitudes, and emotions: new views of affect in mathematics education. In: McLeod DB, Adams VM (eds) Affect and mathematical problem solving: a new perspective. Springer, New York, pp 245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McLeod DB (1992) Research on affect in mathematics education: a reconceptualization. In: Grouws DA (ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 575–596Google Scholar
  11. Raths LE, Harmin M, Simon SB (1987) Selections from values and teaching. In: Carbone PF (ed) Value theory and education. Krieger, Malabar, pp 198–214Google Scholar
  12. White LA (1959) The evolution of culture. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Eva Jablonka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Education and PsychologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany