Engagement with Mathematics
A person is engaged when he or she participates in an activity with cognitive and affective investment. Engagement in school has been studied in terms of students’ observable behaviors, students’ perceptions and beliefs about themselves, their affective feelings, and their sense of belonging in the school setting (Jimerson et al. 2003). Engagement is a complex meta-construct that accounts for cognitive, affective, and socio-behavioral dimensions (Fredricks et al. 2004). Engagement can be viewed as “…the in-the-moment relationship between someone and her immediate environment, including the tasks, internal states, and others with whom she interacts. Engagement manifests itself in activity, including both observable behavior and mental activity involving attention, effort, cognition, and emotion” (Middleton et al. 2017, p. 667). Thus, engagement with mathematics is an interactive relationship students have with the subject matter, as manifested in the moment through...
KeywordsEngagement Motivation Affect Participation
- Csikszentmihalyi M (1997) Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. The masterminds series. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Horn IS (2007) Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. J Learn Sci 16(1):37–79Google Scholar
- Middleton J, Jansen A, Goldin G (2017) The complexities of mathematical engagement: Motivation, affect, and social interactions. In J. Cai (Ed.) First Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (chapter 25, p. 667–699), Reston, VA: NCTMGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez Leal L, Schorr RY, Warner LB (2013) Being challenged in an urban classroom: a case study documenting the engagement of a young male who wanted to “look smart”. J Urban Learn Teach Res 9:78–88Google Scholar
- Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M (2009) Flow in schools: cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In: Gilman RC, Heubner ES, Furlong MJ (eds) Handbook of positive psychology in schools. Routledge, New York, pp 131–145Google Scholar