Advertisement

Cellulose-Based Hydrogels as Smart Corrosion Inhibitors

  • Reem K. Farag
  • Ahmed A. Farag
Living reference work entry
Part of the Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series book series (POPOC)

Abstract

This chapter describes briefly the cellulose-based hydrogel definition, classifications, cross-linked structure of hydrogels and types of polymers used in tailor-made hydrogel. In addition, it describes a brief overview of hydrogel-based on cellulose, definitions, methods of preparation, and applications as smart corrosion inhibitors as discussed in some detailed in the text. Finally, this study provides us the use of polymeric hydrogels as corrosion inhibitors. Corrosion problems have driven out to be progressively serious and reached out to different fields. However, corrosion inhibitors are usually not satisfactory due to bad performance during the mixing process, hydrolyze weather, and decompose during working process. These problems settled by solid corrosion inhibitor, which will release under control. Hydrogel can have the capacity to hold many liquids and characterized by a soft rubbery consistency like living tissues, making them a perfect substance for a variety of applications. In this manner, hydrogels utilized as smart carriers for controlled release of corrosion inhibitors.

Keywords

Hydrogel Cellulose Metal substrates Corrosion inhibitors Release process pH sensitivity 

References

  1. 1.
    Bouwstra JA, Jungiger HE (1993) Hydrogels. Chapter 7. In: Swarbrick J, Boylan JC (eds) Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, 1st edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, p 441Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peppas NA, Khare AR (1993) Preparation, structure and diffusional behavior of hydrogels in controlled release. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 11:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flory PJ (1953) Principles of polymer chemistry. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peppas NA (1991) Physiologically responsive hydrogels. J Bioact Compat Polym 6:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ratner BD, Hoffman AS (1976) Synthetic hydrogels for biomedical applications. In: Andrade JD (ed) Hydrogels for medical and related applications, ACS symposium series, vol 31. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peppas NA, Mongia NK (1997) Ultrapure poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with mucoadhesive drug delivery characteristics. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 43:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamath K, Park K (1993) Biodegradable hydrogels in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 11:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klier J, Peppas NA (1990) Structure and swelling behavior of poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(methacrylic acid) complexes. In: Peppas BL, Harland RS (eds) Absorbent polymer technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 147–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bell CL, Peppas NA (1995) Biomedical membranes from hydrogels and interpolymer complexes. Adv Polym Sci 122:125–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin CC, Metters AT (2006) Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: network design and mathematical modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1379–1408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF (2002) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:13–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen Y, Pan B, Li H, Zhang W, Lv L, Wu J (2010) Selective removal of Cu(II) ions by using cation-exchange resin-supported polyethyleneimine (PEI) nanoclusters. Environ Sci Technol 44:3508–3513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Mulle RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou YT, Nie HL, White CB, He ZY, Zhu LM (2009) Removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution by chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles modified with α-ketoglutaric acid. J Colloid Interface Sci 330:29–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peng ZY, Chen FG (2010) Synthesis and properties of temperature-sensitive hydrogel based on hydroxyethyl cellulose. Int J Polym Mater 59:450–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Menon S, Deepthi MV, Sailaja RRN, Ananthapadmanabha GS (2014) Study on microwave assisted synthesis of biodegradable guar gum grafted acrylic acid superabsorbent nanocomposites. Indian J Adv Chem Sci 2:76–83Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guilherme MR, Reis AV, Paulino AT, Fajardo AR, Muniz EC, Bambourgi E (2007) Superabsorbent hydrogel based on modified polysaccharide for removal of Pb2+ and Cu2+ from water with excellent performance. J Appl Polym Sci 105:2903–2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao L, Mitomo H (2008) Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution onto chitosan entrapped CM cellulose hydrogels synthesized by irradiation. J Appl Polym Sci 110:1388–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farag RK, EL-Saeed SM, Abdel-Raouf ME (2016) Synthesis and investigation of hydrogel nanoparticles based on natural polymer for removal of lead and copper (II) ions. Desalin Water Treat 57:16150–16160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang C, Zhang L (2011) Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym 84:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klemm D, Philipp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry, vol 1. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Isogai A, Atalla RH (1998) Dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH solutions. Cellulose 5:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cai J, Zhang L, Zhou J, Li H, Chen H, Jin H (2004) Novel fibers prepared from cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solutions. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1558–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cai J, Zhang L (2005) Rapid dissolution of cellulose in LiOH/urea and NaOH/urea aqueous solutions. Macromol Biosci 5:539–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jin H, Zha C, Gu L (2007) Direct dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/thiourea/urea aqueous solution. Carbohydr Res 324:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Egal M, Budtova T, Navard P (2007) Structure of aqueous solutions of microcrystalline cellulose/sodium hydroxide below 0 °C and the limit of cellulose dissolution. Biomacromolecules 8:2282–2287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang Y, Zhao Y, Deng Y (2008) Effect of enzymatic treatment on cotton fiber dissolution in NaOH/urea solution at cold temperature. Carbohydr Polym 72:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Egal M, Budtova T, Navard P (2008) The dissolution of microcrystalline cellulose in sodium hydroxide urea aqueous solutions. Cellulose 15:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qi H, Chang C, Zhang L (2008) Effects of temperature and molecular weight on dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Cellulose 15:779–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yan L, Gao Z (2008) Dissolving of cellulose in PEG/NaOH aqueous solution. Cellulose 15:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang S, Li FX, Yu JY, Hsieh YL (2010) Dissolution behaviour of cellulose in NaOH complex solution. Carbohydr Polym 81:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou J, Chang C, Zhang R, Zhang L (2007) Hydrogels prepared from unsubstituted cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Macromol Biosci 7:804–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chang C, Zhang L, Zhou J, Zhang L, Kennedy JF (2010) Structure and properties of hydrogels prepared from cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solutions. Carbohydr Polym 82:122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chang C, Duan B, Cai J, Zhang L (2010) Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery. Eur Polym J 46:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Demitri C, Del Sole R, Scalera F, Sannino A, Vasapollo G, Maffezzoli A, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L (2008) Novel superabsorbent cellulose-based hydrogels crosslinked with citric acid. J Appl Polym Sci 110:2453–2460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ciolacu D, Oprea AM, Anghel N, Cazacu G, Cazacu M (2012) New cellulose-lignin and their application in controlled release of polyphenols. Mater Sci Eng C 32:452–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu J, Liang S, Dai H, Zhang X, Yu X, Cai Y, Zhang L, Wen N, Jiang B, Xu J (2010) Structure and properties of cellulose/chitin blended hydrogel membranes fabricated via a solution pre-gelation technique. Carbohydr Polym 79:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chang C, Lue A, Zhang L (2008) Effects of crosslinking methods on structure and properties of cellulose/PVA hydrogels. Macromol Chem Phys 209:1266–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yamazaki S, Takegawa A, Kaneko Y, Kadokawa J, Yamagata M, Ishikawa M (2009) An acidic cellulose–chitin hybrid gel as novel electrolyte for an electric double layer capacitor. Electrochem Commun 11:68–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Guilminot E, Gavillon R, Chatenet M, Berthon-Fabry S, Rigacci A, Budtova T (2008) New nanostructured carbons based on porous cellulose: elaboration, pyrolysis and use as platinum nanoparticles substrate for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. J Power Sources 185:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sharma M, Mukesh C, Mondal D, Prasad K (2013) Dissolution of α-chitin in deep eutectic solvents. RSC Adv 3:18149–18155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gross AS, Bell AT, Chu JW (2012) Entropy of cellulose dissolution in water and in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolim chloride. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:8425–8430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kuang QL, Zhao JC, Niu YH, Zhang J, Wang ZG (2008) Celluloses in an ionic liquid: the rheological properties of the solutions spanning the dilute and semidilute. regimes. J Phys Chem B 112:10234–10240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhou JP, Zhang L, Cai J, Shu H (2002) Cellulose microporous membranes prepared from NaOH/urea aqueous solution. J Membr Sci 210:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kono H, Fujita S (2012) Biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogels derived from cellulose by esterification crosslinking with 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic dianhydride. Carbohydr Polym 87:2582–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kabra BG, Gehrke SH, Spontak RJ (1998) Microporous, responsive hydroxypropyl cellulose gels. 1. Synthesis and microstructure. Macromolecules 31:2166–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Petrov P, Petrova E, Stamenova R, Tsvetanov CB, Riess G (2006) Cryogels of cellulose derivatives prepared via UV irradiation of moderately frozen systems. Polymer 47:6481–6484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang M, Xu L, Zhai ML, Peng J, Li JQ, Wei GS (2008) γ-ray radiation-induced synthesis and Fe(III) ion adsorption of carboxymethylated chitosan hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 74:498–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhao L, Mitomo H, Nagasawa N, Yoshii F, Kume T (2003) Radiation synthesis and characteristic of the hydrogels based on carboxymethylated chitin derivatives. Carbohydr Polym 51:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Murphy EB, Wudl F (2010) The world of smart healable materials. Prog Polym Sci 35:223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Çaykara T, Şengül G, Birlik G (2006) Preparation and swelling properties of temperature-sensitive semi-interpenetrating polymer networks composed of poly[(N-tert-butylacrylamide)-co-acrylamide] and hydroxypropyl cellulose. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1044–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Spagnol C, Rodrigues FHA, Pereira AGB, Fajard AR, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2012) Superabsorbent hydrogel composite made of cellulose nanofibrils and chitosan-graft-poly(acrylic acid). Carbohydr Polym 87:2038–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Salmawi KME, Ibrahim SM (2011) Characterization of superabsorbent carboxymethylcellulose/clay hydrogel prepared by electron beam irradiation. Macromol Res 19:1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Prasad SS, Rao KM, Reddy PRS, Reddy NS, Rao KSV, Subha MCS (2012) Synthesis and characterisation of guar gum-g-poly(acrylamidoglycolic acid) by redox initiator. Indian J Adv Chem Sci 1(1):28–32Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Farag RK, El-Saeed SM, Maysour NE (2011) Swelling and network parameters of 1-Hexadecene-co-Trimethylolpropane Distearate Monoacrylate Sorbers. J Dispers Sci Technol 32(3):395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu H, Liu Y, Chen W, Du RG, Lin CJ (2009) Corrosion behavior of reinforcing steel in simulated concrete pore solutions: a scanning micro-reference electrode study. Electrochim Acta 54:4067–4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sam J, Jeevana R, Aravindakshan KK, Abraham J (2017) Corrosion inhibition of mild steel by N(4)-substituted thiosemicarbazone in hydrochloric acid media. Egypt J Pet 26:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Farag AA, Migahed MA, Al-Sabagh AM (2015) Adsorption and inhibition behavior of a novel Schiff base on carbon steel corrosion in acid media. Egypt J Pet 24(3):307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Al-Sabagh AM, Abd-El-Bary HM, El-Ghazawy RA, Mishrif MR, Hussein BM (2012) Corrosion inhibition efciency of heavy alkyl benzene derivatives for carbon steel pipelines in 1 M HCl. Egypt J Pet 21:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Migahed MA, Farag AA, Elsaed SM, Kamal R, Mostfa M, Abd El-Bary H (2011) Synthesis of a new family of Schiff base nonionic surfactants and evaluation of their corrosion inhibition effect on X-65 type tubing steel in deep oil wells formation water. Mater Chem Phys 125:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Radi H, Mansoor A (2003) Chitosan-based gastrointestinal delivery systems. J Control Release 89:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Daisuke T, Toshizumi T, Akira T, Kiyoshi Y (2009) Drug release from hydrogel containing albumin as crosslinker. J Biosci Bioeng 100:551–555Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rachna J, Stephany MS, Jean MJF (2007) Synthesis and degradation of pH-sensitive linear poly(amidoamine)s. Macromolecules 40:452–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Karel U, Vladimír S (2004) Polymeric anticancer drugs with pH-controlled activation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:1023–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mohammad S (2001) Synthesis of starch-g-poly (acrylic-acid-co-2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate) as a potential pH-sensitive hydrogel-based drug delivery system. Turk J Chem 35:723–733Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fayyad EM, Almaadeed MA, Jones A, Abdullah AM (2014) Evaluation techniques for the corrosion resistance of self-healing coatings. Int J Electrochem Sci 9:4989–5011Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Riggs OL Jr (1973) Corrosion Inhibitors, 2nd edn. NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), HoustonGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Farag AA, Ismail AS, Migahed MA (2015) Inhibition of carbon steel corrosion in acidic solution using some newly polyester derivatives. J Mol Liq 211:915–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Panpan R, Dawei Z, Chaofang D, Xiaogang L (2015) Preparation and evaluation of intelligent corrosion inhibitor based on photo-crosslinked pH-sensitive hydrogels. Mater Lett 160:480–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Li L, Chaofang D, Liqin L, Jiankuan L, Xo K, Dawei Z, Xiaogang L (2014) Preparation and characterization of pH-controlled-release intelligent corrosion inhibitor. Mater Lett 116:318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ting G, Xiaoyan L, Wenbo C, Beibei L, Haoyuan S (2014) A preliminary research on polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel: a slowly-released anti-corrosion and scale inhibitor. J Pet Sci Eng 122:453–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yangyang Z, Yuwei M, Qijun Y, Jiangxiong W, Jie H (2017) Preparation of pH-sensitive core-shell organic corrosion inhibitor and its release behavior in simulated concrete pore solutions. Mater Des 119:254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kroon G (1993) Associative behavior of hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl celluloses (HMHECs) in waterborne coatings. Prog Org Coat 22(1–4):245–260. ISSN 0300-9440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tarvainena M, Sutinen R, Peltonen S, Mikkonen H, Maunusa J, Vh-Heikkild K, Lehtod VP, Paronena P (2003) Enhanced film-forming properties for ethyl cellulose and starch acetate using N-alkenyl succinic anhydrides as novel plasticizers. Eur J Pharm Sci 19(5):363–371. ISSN 0928-0987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Tamborim SM, Dias SLP, Silva SN, Dick LP, Azambuja DS (2011) Preparation and electrochemical characterization of amoxicillin-doped cellulose acetate films for AA2024-T3 aluminum alloy coatings. Corros Sci 53(4):1571–1580. ISSN 0010-938XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Liu J, Williams RO III (2002) Properties of heat-humidity cured cellulose acetate phthalate free films. Eur J Pharm Sci 17(1–2):31–41. ISSN 0928-0987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Yanshuai W, Guohao F, Weijian D, Ningxu H, Feng X, Biqin D (2015) Self-immunity microcapsules for corrosion protection of steel bar in reinforced concrete. Sci Rep 5:18484Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Arukalam I, Madufor I, Ogbobe O, Oguzie E (2015) Cellulosic polymers for corrosion protection of aluminium. Int J Eng Tech Res 3:2321–0869Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Abiola OK, James A (2010) The effects of aloe vera extract on corrosion and kinetics of corrosion process of zinc in hcl solution. Corros Sci 52:661–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Eddy NO (2009) Inhibitive and adsorption properties of ethanol extract of colocasiaesculenta leaves for the corrosion of mild steel in H2SO4. Int J Phys Sci 4:165–171Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kumpawat V, Garg U, Tak R (2009) Corrosion inhibition of aluminium in acid media by naturally occurring plant Artocarpus heterophyllus and Acacia senegal. J Indian Counc Chem 26:82–84Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lebrini M, Robert F, Lecante A, Roos C (2011) Corrosion inhibition of C38 steel in 1Mhydrochloric acid medium by alkaloids extract from Oxandra asbeckii plant. Corros Sci 53:687–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Shih CS, Chieh CS (2016) Corrosion inhibition of high speed steel by biopolymer HPMC derivatives. Materials 9:612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Villalobos R, Hernández-Muñoz P, Chiralt A (2006) Effect of surfactants on water sorption and barrier properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films. Food Hydrocoll 20:502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Huang T-F, Wu J-Y (2015) Preparation and tribological study of biodegradable lubrication films on Si substrate. Materials 8:1738–1751CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ehrich W, Höh H, Kreiner C (1990) Biocompatibility and pharmacokinetics of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) in the anterior chamber of the rabbit eye. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 196:470–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Falguera V, Quintero JP, Jiménez A, Muñoz JA, Ibarz A (2011) Edible films and coatings: structures, active functions and trends in their use. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jiménez A, Fabra M, Talens P, Chiralt A (2010) Effect of lipid self-association on the microstructure and physical properties of hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose edible films containing fatty acids. Carbohydr Polym 82:585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Arukalam IO, Madufor IC, Ogbobe O, Oguzie EE (2014) Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in sulfuric acid medium by hydroxyethyl cellulose. Chem Eng Commun 202:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Arukalam I, Madufor I, Ogbobe O, Oguzie E (2014) Experimental and theoretical studies of hydroxyethyl cellulose as inhibitor for acid corrosion inhibition of mild steel and aluminium. Quantum 1005:1Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Okechi AI, Chimezie MI, Ogbobe O, Oguzie E (2014) Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as a polymeric corrosion inhibitor for aluminium. Pigm Resin Technol 43:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Arukalam IO (2014) Durability and synergistic effects of ki on the acid corrosion inhibition of mild steel by hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Carbohydr Polym 112:291–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Application DepartmentNasr City, CairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations