Advertisement

Synthesis of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels: Preparation, Formation, Mixture, and Modification

  • Neslihan Kayra
  • Ali Özhan Aytekin
Living reference work entry
Part of the Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series book series (POPOC)

Abstract

Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer, and it has been used in different areas because of its unique properties as various fibril structures and sizes that affect tensile characteristic of the polymer. To increase its features and/or add a new property to cellulose, preparation and modification methods have been deeply investigated and reported. This chapter is classified into four different sections: preparation, formation, mixture, and modifications of cellulose. The preparation method of cellulose (including bacterial cellulose) is important, because it directly effects to fibril formation and structure. In addition to this, depending on usage area, cellulose is necessary to prepare as whisker, fibril, and nano-formations to sustain desired polymer structure. To increase the targeted property of cellulose hydrogel, different kinds of polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol and polyethylene glycol are mixed with cellulose during the preparation of hydrogel. However, cellulose hydrogels still need to improve its physical abilities. Therefore, various modifications have been developed for cellulose and its hydrogel. The most fundamental derivatives are methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose. In addition to this, in recent years, stimuli-responsive and superabsorbent polymers have become more popular. Swelling behavior of hydrogels can be changed by pH, temperature, composition of solvent, and electric field in stimuli-responsive polymers that are available to use in pharmaceutical, bioengineering, and tissue engineering areas. Superabsorbent hydrogels have the ability to absorb water up to several hundred times of their dried weight that can be used in bioengineering, agricultural, tissue engineering areas, and sanitary products. The reaction mechanisms and configurations of mixtures were clearly illustrated in this chapter. Groundbreaking and latest studies were discussed via the hydrogel properties based on analysis of X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), tensile at break, tensile stress, and Young’s modulus.

Keywords

Cellulose Hydrogel Cellulose nanocrystal Cellulose nanofiber Cellulose derivatives 

References

  1. 1.
    Abe K, Yano H (2009) Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose 16(6):1017–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9334-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hivechi A, Bahrami SH (2016) A new cellulose purification approach for higher degree of polymerization: modeling, optimization and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 152:280–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chowdhury ZZ, Hamid SBA (2016) Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose using ultrasonication combined with a microwave-assisted pretreatment process. BioResources 11(2):3397–3415Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, Padmanabhan S, Cheng K, Xie H, Gokhale A, Afzal W, Na H, Pauly M, Bell AT, Prausnitz JM (2014) Two-step delignification of miscanthus to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis: aqueous ammonia followed by sodium hydroxide and oxidants. Energy Fuels 28(1):542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Subhedar PB, Gogate PR (2014) Alkaline and ultrasound assisted alkaline pretreatment for intensification of delignification process from sustainable raw-material. Ultrason Sonochem 21(1):216–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44(22):3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klemm D, Schumann D, Kramer F, Heßler N, Koth D, Sultanova B (2009) Nanocellulose materials – different cellulose, different functionality. Macromol Symp 280(1):60–71.  https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200950608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod 93:2–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fajardo AR, Pereira AGB, Muniz EC (2015) Hydrogels nanocomposites based on crystals,whiskers and fibrils derived from biopolymers. In: Thakur V, Thakur M (eds) Eco-friendly polymer nanocomposites. Advanced structured materials, vol 74. Springer, New Delhi, pp 43–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2017) Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem Mater 29(11):4609–4631.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hebeish A, Farag S, Sharaf S, Shaheen TI (2014) Thermal responsive hydrogels based on semi interpenetrating network of poly (NIPAm) and cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohydr Polym 102:159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bajpai SK, Pathak V, Soni B, Mohan YM (2014) CNWs loaded poly (SA) hydrogels: effect of high concentration of CNWs on water uptake and mechanical properties. Carbohydr Polym 106:351–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goetz L, Mathew A, Oksman K, Gatenholm P, Ragauskas AJ (2009) A novel nanocomposite film prepared from crosslinked cellulosic whiskers. Carbohydr Polym 75(1):85–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dash R, Foston M, Ragauskas AJ (2013) Improving the mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin hydrogels cross-linked by cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohydr Polym 91(2):638–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gonzalez JS, Ludueña LN, Ponce A, Alvarez VA (2014) Poly(vinyl alcohol)/cellulose nanowhiskers nanocomposite hydrogels for potential wound dressings. Mater Sci Eng C 34:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahfoudhi N, Boufi S (2016) Poly (acrylic acid-co-acrylamide)/cellulose nanofibrils nanocomposite hydrogels: effects of CNFs content on the hydrogel properties. Cellulose 23(6): 3691–3701.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1074-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Syverud K, Pettersen SR, Draget K, Chinga-Carrasco G (2014) Controlling the elastic modulus of cellulose nanofibril hydrogels – scaffolds with potential in tissue engineering. Cellulose 22(1):473–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0470-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saito T, Uematsu T, Kimura S, Enomae T, Isogai A (2011) Self-aligned integration of native cellulose nanofibrils towards producing diverse bulk materials. Soft Matter 7(19):8804.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm06050cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang W, Zhang X, Teng A, Liu A (2017) Mechanical reinforcement of gelatin hydrogel with nanofiber cellulose as a function of percolation concentration. Int J Biol Macromol 103: 226–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen SQ, Mikkelsen D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Wang D, Martinez-Sanz M, Gilbert EP, Flanagan BM, Gidley MJ (2017) Characterisation of bacterial cellulose from diverse Komagataeibacterstrains and their application to construct plant cell wall analogues. Cellulose 24(3): 1211–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1203-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50(24): 5438–5466.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mihranyan A (2013) Viscoelastic properties of cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol and surface-oxidized cellulose whisker hydrogels. Cellulose 20(3):1369–1376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9882-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ullah F, Othman MB, Javed F, Ahmad Z, Md Akil H (2015) Classification, processing and application of hydrogels: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 57:414–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hennink W, Van Nostrum CF (2012) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caló E, Khutoryanskiy VV (2015) Biomedical applications of hydrogels: a review of patents and commercial products. Eur Polym J 65:252–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shen X, Shamshina JL, Berton P, Gurau G, Rogers RD (2016) Hydrogels based on cellulose and chitin: fabrication, properties, and applications. Green Chem 18(1):53–75.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc02396cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma J, Li X, Bao Y (2015) Advances in cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. RSC Adv 5(73):59745–59757.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra08522eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chang C, Zhang L (2011) Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):40–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dragan ES (2014) Design and applications of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. A review. Chem Eng J 243:572–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kang H, Liu R, Huang Y (2016) Cellulose-based gels. Macromol Chem Phys 217(12): 1322–1334.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201500493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang C, Liu R, Xiang J, Kang H, Liu Z, Huang Y (2014) Dissolution mechanism of cellulose in N, N-dimethylacetamide/lithium chloride: revisiting through molecular interactions. J Phys Chem B 118(31):9507–9514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rabideau BD, Ismail AE (2015) Effect of water content in n-methylmorpholine n-oxide/cellulose solutions on thermodynamics, structure, and hydrogen bonding. J Phys Chem B 119(48):15014–15022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aouada FA, de Moura MR, Orts WJ, Mattoso LH (2011) Preparation and characterization of novel micro- and nanocomposite hydrogels containing cellulosic fibrils. J Agric Food Chem 59(17):9433–9442.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf202347hCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rodrigues FHA, Spagnol C, Pereira AGB, Martins AF, Fajardo AR, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2014) Superabsorbent hydrogel composites with a focus on hydrogels containing nanofibers or nanowhiskers of cellulose and chitin. J Appl Polym Sci 131(2):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boufi S (2014) Nanofibrillated cellulose: sustainable nanofiller with broad potentials use. In: Hakeem K, Jawaid M, Rashid U (eds) Biomass and bioenergy. Springer, Cham, pp 267–305Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salas C, Nypelö T, Rodriguez-Abreu C, Carrillo C, Rojas OJ (2014) Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 19(5):383–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang J, Xu F (2017) Synergistic reinforcing mechanisms in cellulose nanofibrils composite hydrogels: interfacial dynamics, energy dissipation, and damage resistance. Biomacromolecules 18(8):2623–2632.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yue Y, Han J, Han G, French AD, Qi Y, Wu Q (2016) Cellulose nanofibers reinforced sodium alginate-polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels: core-shell structure formation and property characterization. Carbohydr Polym 147:155–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang H, Yang M, Luan Q, Tang H, Huang F, Xiang X, Yang C, Bao Y (2017) Cellulose anionic hydrogels based on cellulose nanofibers as natural stimulants for seed germination and seedling growth. J Agric Food Chem 65(19):3785–3791.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eyholzer C, Borges de Couraça A, Duc F, Bourban P, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Manson JAE, Oksma K (2011) Biocomposite hydrogels with carboxymethylated, nanofibrillated cellulose powder for replacement of the nucleus pulposus. Biomacromolecules 12(5):1419–1427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ruiz-Palomero C, Soriano ML, Valcárcel M (2016) Gels based on nanocellulose with photosensitive ruthenium bipyridine moieties as sensors for silver nanoparticles in real samples. Sens Actuators B Chem 229:31–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ruiz-Palomero C, Benitez-Martinez S, Soriano ML, Valcarcel M (2017a) Fluorescent nanocellulosic hydrogels based on graphene quantum dots for sensing laccase. Anal Chim Acta 974:93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.04.018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ruiz-Palomero C, Soriano ML, Benítez-Martínez S, Valcárcel M (2017b) Photoluminescent sensing hydrogel platform based on the combination of nanocellulose and S,N-codoped graphene quantum dots. Sens Actuators B Chem 245:946–953.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang X, Bakaic E, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2013) Injectable polysaccharide hydrogels reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: morphology, rheology, degradation, and cytotoxicity. Biomacromolecules 14(12):4447–4455.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm401364zCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    De France KJ, Chan KJ, Cranston ED, Hoare T (2016) Enhanced mechanical properties in cellulose nanocrystal-poly(oligoethylene glycol methacrylate) injectable nanocomposite hydrogels through control of physical and chemical cross-linking. Biomacromolecules 17(2):649–660.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shao C, Wang M, Chang H, Xu F, Yang J (2017) A self-healing cellulose nanocrystal-poly(ethylene glycol) nanocomposite hydrogel via diels–alder click reaction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(7):6167–6174.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lin N, Geze A, Wouessidjewe D, Huang J, Dufresne A (2016) Biocompatible double-membrane hydrogels from cationic cellulose nanocrystals and anionic alginate as complexing drugs codelivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(11):6880–6889.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b00555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dadoo N, Landry SB, Bomar JD, Gramlich WM (2017) Synthesis and spatiotemporal modification of biocompatible and stimuli-responsive carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogelsusing thiol-norbornene chemistry. Macromol Biosci 17(9):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201700107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shen Y, Li X, Huang Y, Chang G, Cao K, Yang J, Zhang R, Sheng X, Ye X (2016) pH and redox dual stimuli-responsive injectable hydrogels based on carboxymethyl cellulose derivatives. Macromol Res 24(7):602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu H, Rong L, Wang B, Xie R, Sui X, Xu H, Zhang L, Zhong Y, Mao Z (2017) Facile fabrication of redox/pH dual stimuli responsive cellulose hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym 176:299–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kelly JA, Shukaliak AM, Cheung CC, Shopsowitz KE, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ (2013) Responsive photonic hydrogels based on nanocrystalline cellulose. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(34):8912–8916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tang J, Berry RM, Tam KC (2016) Stimuli-responsive cellulose nanocrystals for surfactant-free oil harvesting. Biomacromolecules 17(5):1748–1756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mohd Amin MCI, Ahmad N, Pandey M, Jue Xin C (2014) Stimuli-responsive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels for oral controlled release drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 40(10):1340–1349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shi X, Zheng Y, Wang G, Lin Q, Fan J (2014) pH-and electro-response characteristics of bacterial cellulose nanofiber/sodium alginate hybrid hydrogels for dual controlled drug delivery. RSC Adv 4(87):47056–47065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chang C, Duan B, Cai J, Zhang L (2010) Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery. Eur Polym J 46(1):92–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.04.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Spagnol C, Rodrigues FHA, Pereira AGB, Fajardo AR, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2012) Superabsorbent hydrogel nanocomposites based on starch-g-poly(sodium acrylate) matrix filled with cellulose nanowhiskers. Cellulose 19(4):1225–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9711-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bao Y, Ma J, Li N (2011) Synthesis and swelling behaviors of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly(AA-co-AM-co-AMPS)/MMTsuperabsorbent hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):76–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peng N, Hu D, Zeng J, Li Y, Liang L, Chang C (2016) Superabsorbent cellulose–claynanocomposite hydrogels for highly efficient removal of dye in water. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(12):7217–7224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Peng N, Wang Y, Ye Q, Liang L, An Y, Li Q, Chang C (2016) Biocompatible cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels with antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr Polym 137:59–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology Graduate Program, Graduate School of Natural and Applied SciencesYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Genetics and Bioengineering Department, Engineering FacultyYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations