Advertisement

Ethics of Discourse Analysis

  • Meta GorupEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter discusses ethical dilemmas and questions of integrity characteristic of the conduct of discourse analysis (DA). Following a general introduction to the ethics and integrity of DA, the text expands on three discourse analytic approaches: discursive psychology, narrative inquiry, and critical discourse analysis. The chapter presents how ethical and integrity concerns manifest themselves and how they may be addressed in regard to the specifics of each of these forms of DA. Readers are introduced to the basic principles of research ethics – such as voluntary and informed consent, confidentiality and anonymity, and minimizing harm – as well as those distinctive to the interpretive and critical endeavors characteristic of much DA. These closely relate to questions of research integrity, and more specifically to the grounds of analysts’ interpretations, representation of research participants, and the place of discourse scholars’ critique and application of their analyses. The chapter concludes by calling for a continual and honest discussion of ethical dilemmas if we are to ensure that consideration of ethics becomes inherent to any discourse analytic endeavor.

Keywords

Ethics Integrity Discourse analysis Discursive psychology Narrative inquiry Critical discourse analysis 

References

  1. Adams TE (2008) A review of narrative ethics. Qual Inq 14(2):175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaki C, Billig M, Edwards D et al (2003) Discourse analysis means doing analysis: a critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker P, Ellece S (2011) Key terms in discourse analysis. Continuum, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger Gluck S (2014) Reflecting on the quantum leap: promises and perils of oral history on the web. Oral Hist Rev 41(2):244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce A, Beuthin R, Sheilds L et al (2016) Narrative research evolving: evolving through narrative research. Int J Qual Methods 15(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caine V, Murphy MS, Estefan A et al (2017) Exploring the purposes of fictionalization in narrative inquiry. Qual Inq 23(3):215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chase SE (1996) Personal vulnerability and interpretive authority in narrative research. In: Josselson R (ed) Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chase SE (2005) Narrative inquiry: multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 651–679Google Scholar
  9. Clandinin DJ, Connelly FM (2000) Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Clandinin DJ, Caine V, Lessard S (2018) The relational ethics of narrative inquiry. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards D (2012) Discursive and scientific psychology. Br J Soc Psychol 51(3):425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis C (2007) Telling secrets, revealing lives: relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qual Inq 13(1):3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etherington K (2007) Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qual Inq 13(5):599–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairclough N (1989) Language and power. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairclough N, Fairclough I (2018) A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gee JP (2011) An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham P (2018) Ethics in critical discourse analysis. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammersley M (1997) On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Lang Commun 17(3):237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammersley M (2014) On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qual Res 14(5):529–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hepburn A (2006) Getting closer at a distance: theory and the contingencies of practice. Theory Psychol 16(3):327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hepburn A, Potter J (2004) Discourse analytic practice. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF et al (eds) Qualitative research practice. SAGE, London, pp 168–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hepburn A, Wiggins S (eds) (2007) Discursive research in practice: new approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Herzog B (2016) Discourse analysis as social critique: discursive and non-discursive realities in critical social research. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herzog B (2018) Suffering as an anchor of critique: the place of critique in critical discourse studies. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Josselson R (1996) Introduction. In: Josselson R (ed) Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp xi–xviiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Josselson R (2007) The ethical attitude in narrative research: principles and practicalities. In: Clandinin DJ (ed) Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 537–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lieblich A (1996) Some unforeseen outcomes of conducting narrative research with people of one’s own culture. In: Josselson R (ed) Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lieblich A (2006) Vicissitudes: a study, a book, a play: lessons from the work of a narrative scholar. Qual Inq 12(1):60–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Potter J (2010) Contemporary discursive psychology: issues, prospects, and Corcoran’s awkward ontology. Br J Soc Psychol 49(4):657–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Potter J (2012a) Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In: Cooper H, Camic PH, Long DL et al (eds) APA handbook of research methods in psychology:Vol. 2, Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Potter J (2012b) Re-reading discourse and social psychology: transforming social psychology. Br J Soc Psychol 51(3):436–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Rapley T (2007) Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. SAGE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reisigl M, Wodak R (2001) Discourse and discrimination: rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Roderick I (2018) Multimodal critical discourse analysis as ethical praxis. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sabar G, Sabar Ben-Yehoshua N (2017) ‘I’ll sue you if you publish my wife’s interview’: ethical dilemmas in qualitative research based on life stories. Qual Res 17(4):408–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smythe WE, Murray MJ (2000) Owning the story: ethical considerations in narrative research. Ethics Behav 10(4):311–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stokoe E, Hepburn A, Antaki C (2012) Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. Br J Soc Psychol 51(3):486–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor S (2001a) Evaluating and applying discourse analytic research. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ (eds) Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. SAGE, London, pp 311–330Google Scholar
  40. Taylor S (2001b) Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ (eds) Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. SAGE, London, pp 5–48Google Scholar
  41. Taylor S, Smith R (2014) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: responses to Martyn Hammersley. Qual Res 14(5):542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Dijk TA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse Soc 4(2):249–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Dijk TA (2008) Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse Soc 19(6):821–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Leeuwen T (2018) Moral evaluation in critical discourse analysis. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiggins S (2017) Discursive psychology: theory, method and applications. SAGE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiggins S, Potter J (2017) Discursive psychology. In: Willig C, Stainton Rogers W (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. SAGE, London, pp 93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Willig C (2004) Discourse analysis and health psychology. In: Murray M (ed) Critical health psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke/New York, pp 155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wodak R (2001) The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak R, Meyer M (eds) Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE, London, pp 63–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wood LA, Kroger RO (2000) Doing discourse analysis: methods for studying action in talk and text. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations