Advertisement

Biomedicine and Its Historiography: A Systematic Review

  • Nicolas Rasmussen
Living reference work entry
Part of the Historiography of Science book series (HISTSC, volume 1)

Abstract

In this essay I conduct a quantitative systematic review of the scholarly literature in history of life sciences, assessing how well the distribution of the activity of historians aligns with the distribution of activities of scientists across fields of biomedical research as defined by expenditures by the cognate institutes of the United States NIH. I also ask how well the distribution of resources to the various research fields of biomedicine in the second half of the 20th Century has aligned with morbidity and mortality in the United States associated with the cognate disease categories. The two exercises point to underexplored areas for historical work, and open new historical questions about research policy in the US.

References

  1. Agar J (2012) Science in the 20th century and beyond. Polity, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson W, Mackay IR (2014) Intolerant bodies: a short history of autoimmunity. Johns Hopkins University Press., BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. Appel T (2003) Shaping biology: the National Science Foundation and American biological research, 1945–1975. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  4. Bemme D, D’Souza NA (2014) Global mental health and its discontents: an inquiry into the making of global and local scale. Transcult Psychiatry 51:850–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bero LA (2005) Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Rep 120:200–208CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom FE, Randolph MA (eds) (1990) Funding health sciences research: a strategy to restore balance. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235742/Google Scholar
  7. Boychuk G (2008) National health insurance in the United States and Canada: race, territory, and the roots of difference. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt AM (2012) Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics. Am J Public Health 102:63–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brhlikova P, Pollock AM, Manners R (2011) Global burden of disease estimates of depression–how reliable is the epidemiological evidence? J R Soc Med 104:25–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown R (1979) Rockefeller medicine men: medicine and capitalism in America. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke AE, Mamo L, Fosket JR, Fishman JR, Shim JK (2009) Biomedicalization: technoscience, health, and illness in the U. S. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forman P (1992) Inventing the maser in postwar America. Osiris 7:105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox DM (1987) The politics of the NIH extramural program, 1937–1950. J Hist Med Allied Sci 42:447–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller S (2000) Thomas Kuhn: a philosophical history for our times. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaudillière J-P (2002) Inventer la biomedicine: La France, l’Amérique et la production des savoirs du vivant (1945–1965). Éditions la Découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Geiger R (2008) Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  17. Grob G (1996) Creation of the National Institute of Mental Health. Public Health Rep 111:378–381PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Halliday F (1983) The making of the Second Cold War. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamowy R (2008) Government and public health in America. Edward Elgar, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hollinger DA (1995) Science as a weapon in Kulturkampfe in the United States during and after World War II. Isis 86:440–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kevles DJ (1977) The National Science Foundation and the debate over postwar research policy, 1942–1945: a political interpretation of science – the endless frontier. Isis 68:5–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleinman D (1994) Layers of interests, layers of influence: business and the genesis of the national science foundation. Sci Technol Hum Values 19:259–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohler R (1991) Partners in science: foundations and natural scientists, 1900–1945. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Krementsov N (2002) The cure: a story of cancer and politics from the annals of the Cold War. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Krige J (2006) American hegemony and the postwar reconstruction of science in Europe. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Ludmerer K (1985) Learning to heal: the development of American medical education. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc O, Bero L (2012) Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):Art. No.: MR000033.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2
  28. Mayes R (2004) Universal coverage: the elusive quest for national health insurance. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  29. Moses H 3rd, Matheson D, Cairns-Smith S, George B, Palisch C, Ray Dorsey E (2015) The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA 313:174–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Osgood K (2006) Total Cold War: Eisenhower’s secret propaganda battle at home and abroad. University of Kansas Press, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  31. Painter D (2002) The Cold War: an international history. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Poen MM (1996) Harry S. Truman versus the medical lobby: the genesis of medicare. University of Missouri Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Stein C, Havelaar AH (2012) Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years. Popul Health Metrics 10:21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-10-21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porter R (1998) The greatest benefit to mankind: a medical history of humanity. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Proctor R (2011) Golden holocaust: origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabinow P, Rose N (2006) Biopower today. BioSocieties 1:195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rasmussen N (1993) Freund’s adjuvant and the realization of questions in postwar immunology. Hist Stud Phys Biol Sci 23:337–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasmussen N (2014) Gene jockeys: life science and the rise of biotech enterprise. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  39. Rothstein W (1987) American medical schools and the practice of medicine : a history. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Saunders FS (2000) Who paid the piper?: the CIA and the cultural cold war. Granta, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Shapin S (2008) The scientific life: a moral history of a late modern vocation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shyrock R (1980) American medical research past and present. Arno, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Starr P (1982) The social transformation of American medicine. Basic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Strickland S (1972) Politics, science, and dread disease: a short history of United States medical research policy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strickland S (1989) The story of the NIH grants programs. University Press of America, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  46. Sunder Rajan K (2006) Biocapital: the constitution of postgenomic life. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vogel MJ, Rosenberg C (eds) (1979) The therapeutic revolution: essays in the social history of American medicine. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiesz G (2014) Chronic disease in the twentieth century a history. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilford H (2009) The mighty Wurlitzer: how the CIA played America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Yi D (2015) The recombinant university: genetic engineering and the emergence of Stanford biotechnology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations