Skip to main content

Structuration Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 420 Accesses

Introduction

The concept of structuration in social theory broadly refers to the theoretical attempt to move beyond the traditional, entrenched dichotomy between agents and structures by reconceptualizing the relationship between them. As such it encompasses the work of a number of influential social theorists like Anthony Giddens, Pierre Bourdieu, and Roy Bhaskar to mention but a few that have articulated comprehensive frameworks to deal with the so-called agent-structure problem. Yet the term structuration theory (ST) is generally narrowly identified with the approach thoroughly developed by Giddens. This entry presents a general review on the contribution of ST in social theory and its implications for the study of security.

Prevalent Conceptualizations of Social Action and Social Structure in Social Theory

Giddens’s approach has emerged as a result of dissatisfaction with the prevalent conceptualization of social structure in social theory, drawing on a critical dialogue with the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (2006). Understanding social theory. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological theory: What went wrong? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. (2006). Structuration’s future? Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 122–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpora, D. (1998). Four concepts of social structure. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 339–355). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2010). Method in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A., & Shapiro, I. (1997). The misunderstood promise of realist social theory. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), Contemporary empirical political theory (pp. 166–187). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klevis Kolasi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kolasi, K. (2020). Structuration Theory. In: Romaniuk, S., Thapa, M., Marton, P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_360-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_360-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics