The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies

Living Edition
| Editors: Scott Romaniuk, Manish Thapa, Péter Marton

Resilience

  • Camila de Macedo BragaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_117-1

Introduction

Ideas come and go and then come again. Old ideas may resurge in different connotations or new webs of meaning, as they are transplanted from one field of knowledge to the other. They may also self-structure to a more updated version of themselves, as dynamic as the world in which they emerge. Perhaps, a better description could be “old wine in new bottles.” Concepts in political thought have travelled wide and far by engaging in both processes, and the same can be observed in the current upsurge of resilience-thinking.

The concept of “resilience” first emerged in the realm of natural sciences and transitioned from ecology to economy, until the social sciences’ positivist agenda brought it home in the 1970s. The context was set to welcome it: the disillusionment with liberal-thinking, the perceived failure of the social state, and the weak capacities of the international institutional system in responding to the looming “world crises.” At the end of the twentieth century,...

Keywords

Complex emergencies Security Social change 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alagona. (2014). Resilience. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities, 1(1).  https://doi.org/10.5250/resilience.1.1.01.
  2. Bourbeau, P. (2013). Resiliencism: Premises and promises in securitisation research. Resilience, 1(1), 3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.765738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandler, D. (2013a). Editorial. Resilience, 1(1), 1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.765739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandler, D. (2013b). International Statebuilding and the ideology of resilience. Politics, 33(4), 276–286.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandler, D. (2014). Beyond neoliberalism: Resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience, 2(1), 47–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.878544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coaffee, J., & Fussey, P. (2015). Constructing resilience through security and surveillance: The politics, practices and tensions of security-driven resilience. Security Dialogue, 46(1), 86–105.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614557884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunn Cavelty, M., Kaufmann, M., & Søby Kristensen, K. (2015). Resilience and (in)security: Practices, subjects, temporalities. Security Dialogue, 46(1), 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614559637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, B., & Reid, J. (2013). Dangerously exposed: The life and death of the resilient subject. Resilience, 1(2), 83–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.770703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31–44). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Interpeace. (2015). Fostering resilience for peace (Annual report). Geneva: Interpeace, 88p. Retrieved from: https://www.interpeace.org/
  12. Jütersonke, O., & Kartas, M. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.gpplatform.ch/publications
  13. United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York/London: United Nations.Google Scholar
  14. World Bank. (2011). World development report 2011: Conflict, security, and development. The World Bank.  https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8439-8.
  15. Zebrowski, C. (2013). The nature of resilience. Resilience, 1(3), 159–173.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.804672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Brassett, J., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). Security and the performative politics of resilience: Critical infrastructure protection and humanitarian emergency preparedness. Security Dialogue, 46(1), 32–50.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614555943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandler, D. (2012). Resilience and human security: The post-interventionist paradigm. Security Dialogue, 43(3), 213–229.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612444151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Coning, C. (2018). Adaptive peacebuilding. International Affairs, 94(2), 301–317.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  1. Jana Hönke, Markus-Michael Müller, Mark Duffield, (2012) Challenging environments: Danger, resilience and the aid industry. Security Dialogue 43 (5):475-492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143–160.https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611399616CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Conflict and Peace StudiesUniversity of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil