Advertisement

Private Interests and the Common Good: Conflicting Priorities in a School Choice World

  • Casey D. CobbEmail author
  • Jason Irizarry
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter examines the global trend of school choice through privatization and quasi-privatization and considers the implications for disadvantaged populations. Examination of school choice policies in Puerto Rico (charter schools), Chile (school vouchers), and the United Kingdom (academies) helps illustrate how market-based reforms attempt to address inequities in educational opportunity, access, and performance. The pursuit of unregulated school choice through self-governed schools in the United Kingdom and Puerto Rico appears to exacerbate disparities, prioritize schooling as a private good at the expense of the public good, and promote inefficient and inequitable dual systems of education. Under Chile’s differentiated voucher program, attempts were made to level the playing field for disadvantaged families; however, outcomes suggest a system of privilege persists. School choice policies that promote the value of individualism are ill equipped to achieve socially just ends for all students, particularly those from marginalized groups. A renewal of the democratic principles of the collective good is called for, where common interests guide public policy and public policy serves common interests.

Keywords

Education policy School choice Vouchers Charter schools Education reform Privatization Public good Public education Social justice Social stratification Government schools Student inequities Parent choice Quasi-privatization Privilege Market-based reform Competition Neoliberal reform Neoliberalism Democracy United States Puerto Rico Chile United Kingdom 

References

  1. Acevedo, N. (2018). Puerto Rico opens first charter school amid controversies. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/puerto-rico-opens-first-ever-charter-school-amid-controversies-n902056
  2. Adamson, F., Cook-Harvey, C. M., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Whose choice? Student experiences and outcomes in the New Orleans school marketplace. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.Google Scholar
  3. Akers, J. M. (2012). Separate and unequal: The consumption of public education in post‐Katrina New Orleans. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J., & Nikita, D. P. (2014). The global middle class and school choice: A cosmopolitan sociology. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(3), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnum, M. (2017). Does England’s expansion of charter-like “academies” hold a lesson for the U.S.? Chalkbeat. Retrieved from https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/us/2017/09/21/does-englands-rapid-expansion-of-charter-like-academies-hold-a-lesson-for-the-u-s/
  7. Barrera-Osorio, F., & Patrinos, H. A. (2009). An international perspective on school vouchers. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, G. Matthew, D. Ballou, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 339–358). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2015). Privatizing educational choice: Consequences for parents, schools, and public policy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, D. J., & Hentschke, G. C. (2009). An international perspective on publicly-financed, privately-operated schools. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, G. Matthew, D. Ballou, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 227–246). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bunar, N. (2012). Parents and teachers on local school markets–evidence from Sweden. Occasional Paper, 208.Google Scholar
  11. Buras, K. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carnoy, M., & McEwan, P. (2003). Does privatization improve education? The case of Chile’s national voucher plan. Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective, pp. 24–44.Google Scholar
  13. Cookson, P. W., Jr., Darling-Hammond, L., Rothman, R., & Shields, P. M. (2018). The tapestry of American public education: How we can create a system of schools worth choosing for all? Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  14. David, R., Hesla, K., & Pendergrass, S. A. (2017). A growing movement: America’s largest public charter school communities.National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.Google Scholar
  15. Dixson, A. D., Buras, K. L., & Jeffers, E. K. (2015). The color of reform: Race, education reform, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elacqua, G. (2009). The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. Centro de Politicas Comparadas de Educacion. Retrieved from http://www.educacion2020.cl/sites/default/files/dtcpce10_upd.pdf
  17. Elacqua, G. (2012). The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(3), 444–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elacqua, G., Contreras, D., & Salazar, F. (2008). Scaling up in Chile: Larger networks of schools produce higher student achievement. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/scaling-up-in-chile/
  19. Eyles, A., Machin, S., & McNally, S. (2017). Unexpected school reform: Academisation of primary schools in England. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2017). Self-governing schools, parental choice, and the need to protect the public interest. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forsey, M., Davies, S., & Walford, G. (Eds.). (2008). The globalisation of school choice? Oxford: Symposium Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Fredriksson, A. (2009). On the consequences of the marketisation of public education in Sweden: For-profit charter schools and the emergence of the ‘market-oriented teacher’. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garcia, A. (2017). Chile’s school voucher system: Enabling choice or perpetuating social inequality? https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral/chiles-school-voucher-system-enabling-choice-or-perpetuating-social-inequality/
  24. Garn, G., & Cobb, C. D. (2001). A framework for understanding charter school accountability. Education and Urban Society, 33(2), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garner, R. (2016). England’s charter-style schools on rise. Education Writers Association. https://www.ewa.org/blog-educated-reporter/englands-charter-style-schools-rise
  26. Gilbert, F. (2011). Our analysis challenges the idea that free schools will save money or improve standards. Local Schools Network, 27 Jan. Retrieved from http://www.localschoolsnetwork.org.uk/ 2011/01/our-analysis-challenges-the-idea-that-free-schools-will-save-money-or-improve-stan-dards/
  27. Gittleson, K. (2010). Charter school lottery statistics. Retrieved from https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2010/04/14/charter-school-lottery-statistics/
  28. Green, E. L. (2019). Betsy DeVos backs $5 billion in tax credits for school choice. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/. 28 Feb 2019
  29. Gurney, K. (2018). Puerto Rico: The forgotten island. Miami Herald. 21 Sept 2018. Retrieved from https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article216638500.html
  30. Guthrie, J. W., & Reed, R. J. (1986). Educational administration and policy: Effective leadership for American education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Harris, D. N., & Larsen, M. F. (2018). What effect did the New Orleans school reforms have on students achievement, high school graduation, and college outcomes? Education Research Alliance Policy Brief. New Orleans.Google Scholar
  32. Hatcher, R. (2011). The conservative-Liberal democrat coalition government’s “free schools” in England. Educational Review, 63(4), 485–503.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.616635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Higgins, L. (2017). Report: For-profit run charter schools perform worse. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from https://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2017/06/18/charter-schools-profit-performance/393071001/. 17 June 2017.
  34. Hsieh, C. T., & Urquiola, M. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile’s voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1477–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirk, M. (2018). Why Puerto Rico is pushing to privatize its schools. CityLab, 27 Feb. Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/02/why-puerto-rico-is-pushing-to-privatize-its-schools/554198/
  36. Labaree, D. F. (2018). Public schools for private gain: The declining American commitment to serving the public good. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(3), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ladd, H. F., & Fiske, E. B. (2003). Does competition improve teaching and learning? Evidence from New Zealand. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ladd, H. F., & Fiske, E. B. (2016). England confronts the limits of school autonomy. Columbia University, Teachers College, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Working Paper, Vol. 232.Google Scholar
  39. Mazzei, P. (2018). Puerto Rico’s schools are in tumult, and not just because of Hurricane María. New York Times, June 1, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/01/us/puerto-rico-school-closings.html.
  40. Milton, F. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Murnane, R. J., Waldman, M. R. Willett, J. B., Bos, M. S., & Vegas, E. (2017). The consequences of educational voucher reform in Chile. IDB Working Paper Series, No. IDB-WP-833. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Washington, DC.  https://doi.org/10.18235/0000886. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/173885/1/IDB-WP-833.pdf
  42. Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 66, OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fq23507vc-en
  43. National Conference of State Legislatures (2018). School choice and charters. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/school-choice-and-charters.aspx
  44. Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (Eds.). (2013). Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Poikolainen, J. (2012). A case study of parents’ school choice strategies in a Finnish urban context. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Private School Choice Programs: Frequently Asked Questions for Parents–2018-19 School Year (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/sms/Choice/Student_Application_Webpage/PSCP_FAQ_2018-19_Final.pdf
  47. Robles, F. (2017). Puerto Rico’s University is Paralyzed by Protests and Facing Huge Cuts.New York, NY: The New York Times. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/us/puerto-ricos-university-is-paralyzed-by-protests-and-facing-huge-cuts.html
  48. Rodríquez, V. (2011). Social protest and the future of higher education in Puerto Rico. Academe, 97(4), 26–31.Google Scholar
  49. Shafiq, M. N., & Myers, J. P. (2014). Educational vouchers and social cohesion: A statistical analysis of student civic attitudes in Sweden, 1999–2009. American Journal of Education, 121(1), 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Vol. 13). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  51. Strauss, V., Douglas-Gabriel, D., & Balingit, M. (2018). DeVos seeks cuts from education department to support school choice. Washington Post. 13 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  52. Swanson, A. D., & King, R. A. (1991). School finance: Its economics and politics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  53. Tuzzolo, E., & Hewitt, D. T. (2006). Rebuilding inequity: The re-emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90(2), 59–68.Google Scholar
  54. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). The Condition of Education 2017 (2018–144), Public Charter School Enrollment.Google Scholar
  55. Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & De los Ríos, D. (2014). Socioeconomic school segregation ina market oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Educational Policy, 29(2), 217–241.Google Scholar
  56. Valenzuela, J. P., & Montecinos, C. (2017). Structural reforms and equity in Chilean schools. Retrieved from http://education.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-108
  57. Wiborg, S. (2010). The Swedish free schools: Do they work? Llakes Research Report.Google Scholar
  58. Wirt, F., Mitchell, D., & Marshall, C. (1988). Culture and education policy: Analyzing values in state policy systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wixom, M. A. (2017). 50-state comparison: Vouchers. Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from https://www.ecs.org/50-state-comparison-vouchers/. 6 Mar 2017
  60. Yamiche, A. (2017). Trump’s call for school vouchers is a return to a campaign pledge. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/. 1 Mar 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neag School of EducationUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • John M. Heffron
    • 1
  1. 1.The Graduate SchoolSoka University of AmericaAliso ViejoUSA

Personalised recommendations