Advertisement

Restricting Social Justice Practices in Public Education: The Neoliberal Stronghold

  • Karen RamlackhanEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter focuses on how neoliberal ideology has shaped contemporary educational reform in the United States. This approach to education shapes the development and enaction of education policies such that substantial institutional and cultural change is made for purposes of economic gain as against more strictly public ones, tied less to temporal profit considerations. These reforms, influenced by business and market-based approaches, undermine social justice efforts because of their intense focus on efficiency and narrowly framed measurable outcomes and punitive accountability practices. Neoliberal educational policies shape classroom practices that reinforce the values and traditions of the dominant culture as well as exacerbate structural and systemic inequities that profoundly influence the educational experiences, outcomes, and trajectories of marginalized groups. The opposition of the neoliberal ideology against the fundamental objective of social justice preserves the systemic and structural inequities that impact marginalized students (e.g., based on race, socioeconomic status, language, ability, religion, gender, and so forth). Thus, it continues the stratification of educational experience and achievement outcomes of the privileged. Needed are systemic and systematic social justice focused-efforts to address the complexities of teaching and learning in public education. Practices that value marginalized populations such as those described in the culturally responsive pedagogy research literature warrant their meaningful and sustainable utility in education reform. Otherwise, advantage for the privileged will persist and grow as disparities continue to widen and detrimentally shape the postsecondary outcomes for marginalized students.

Keywords

Educational reform Efficiency Social responsibility Accountability Neoliberalism Neoliberal Standardized Social justice Equity Audit culture High-stakes testing High poverty Inequities Critical thinkers Culturally responsive Pedagogy Activism Politics Latinx Black Achievement gap Multicultural Democratic Stratification Inclusion Meritocracy Urban Quantifiable Gender Socioeconomic status Oppressive Policy Racial inequality Curricula Measurable Institutions Teachers Districts Deprofessionalization Intersectionality Choice Charter System-wide Private Market-based Public schools Disability Race/ethnicity Globalized 

References

  1. Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2012). New teachers of color and culturally responsive teaching in an era of educational accountability: Caught in a double bind. Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R. T., Sexton, D., & Freitas, C. (2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff schools”. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, T. G., English, F. W., & Papa, R. (2014). A philosophical deconstruction of leadership and social justice associated with the high-stakes testing and accountability system. In A. H. Normore & J. S. Brooks (Eds.), Educational leadership for ethics and social justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, G. L., & Cohen, M. I. (2018). The new democratic professional in education: Confronting markets, metrics, and managerialism. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Apple, M. W. (2005). Audit cultures, commodification, and class and race strategies in education. Policy Futures in Education, 3(4), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Apple, M. (2007). Education, markets, and an audit culture. International Journal of Educational Policies, 1(1), 4–19.Google Scholar
  7. Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the New Taylorism: High-stakes testing and standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Au, W. (2016a). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Education Policy, 30(1), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Au, W. (2016b). Social justice and resisting neoliberal education reform in the USA. Forum, 58(3), 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Au, W., & Ferrare, J. J. (2015). Mapping corporate education reform: Politics and power in the neoliberal state. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ball, S. J. (2010). New voices, new knowledges and the new politics of education research: The gathering of a perfect storm? European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berliner, D. C. (2009). MCLB (much curriculum left behind): A U.S. Calamity in the making. The Educational Forum, 73(4), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlisle, L. R., Jackson, B. W., & George, A. (2006). Principles of social justice education: The social justice education in schools project. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chubbuck, S. (2010). Individual and structural orientations in socially just teaching: Conceptualization, implementation, and collaborative effort. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “no child left behind”. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 10(3), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2011). The new public service: Serving, not steering. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Dover, A. G. (2009). Teaching for social justice and K–12 student outcomes: A conceptual framework and research review. Excellence & Equity in Education, 42(4), 506–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamoran, A., & Fernandez, C. M. (2018). Do charter schools strengthen education in high-poverty urban districts. In I. C. Rotberg & J. L. Glazer (Eds.), Choosing Charters: Better schools or more segregation? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Giroux, H. A. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610, 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heilig, J., & Holme, J. (2013). Nearly 50 years post-Jim Crow: Persisting and expansive school segregation for African American, Latina/o, and ELL students in Texas. Education and Urban Society, 45(5), 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, D. (2003). Global neo-liberalism, the deformation of education and resistance. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
  25. Keddie, A. (2013). Thriving amid the performative demands of the contemporary audit culture: A matter of school context. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klaf, S., & Kwan, M. P. (2010). The neoliberal straitjacket and public education in the United States: Understanding contemporary education reform and its urban implications. Urban Geography, 31(2), 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipman, P. (2011a). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the City. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lipman, P. (2011b). Contesting the city: Neoliberal urbanism and the cultural politics of education reform in Chicago. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 217–234.Google Scholar
  31. Love, B. J. (2004). Brown plus 50 counter-storytelling: A critical race theory analysis of the “majoritarian achievement gap” story. Equity and Excellence in Education, 37(3), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lubienski, C. A., & Lubienski, S. T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maisuria, A. (2005). The turbulent times of creativity. Policy Futures in Education, 3(2), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mickelson, R., Bottia, M., & Lambert, R. (2013). A meta-regression analysis of the effects of school and classroom composition on mathematics outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 83, 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mthethwa-Sommers, S. (2013). Pedagogical possibilities: Lessons from social justice educators. Journal of Transformative Education, 10(4), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M. (2008). Statement of American social scientist of research on school desegregation to the U. S. supreme court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jeffereson County. The Urban Review, 40(1), 96–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ravitch, C. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Reardon, S., Grewal, E., Kalogrides, D., & Greenberg, E. (2012). Brown faces: The end of court ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 876–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rotberg, I. C., & Glazer, J. L. (2018). Choosing charters: Better schools or more segregation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, T. (2011). A nation at risk to win the future: The state of public education in the US. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(1), 267–316.Google Scholar
  42. Siegel-Hawley, G. (2014). Bending toward justice? What public policy can tell us about leadership for social justice. In A. H. Normore & J. S. Brooks (Eds.), Educational leadership for ethics and social justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Sleeter, C. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47(3), 562–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sloan, K. (2008). The expanding educational services sector: Neoliberalism and the corporatization of curriculum at the local level in the US. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(5), 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tabron, L. A., & Ramlackhan, K. (2019). Hypocrisy, state policy, and African American students with disabilities: The guise of access. Educational Policy, 33(1), 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tapper, A. J. H. (2013). A pedagogy of social justice education: Social identity theory, intersectionality, and empowerment. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 30(4), 411–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Villegas, A. M., & Irvine, J. J. (2010). Diversifying the teaching workforce: An examination of major arguments. Urban Review, 42(3), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright, K. B., Shields, S. M., Black, K., Banerjee, M., & Waxman, H. C. (2018). Teacher perceptions of influence, autonomy, and satisfaction in the early race to the top era. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(62), 1.Google Scholar
  51. Ylimaki, R. (2011). Critical curriculum leadership: A framework for progressive education. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeichner, K. (2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1544–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South Florida-St. PetersburgSt. PetersburgUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • John M. Heffron
    • 1
  1. 1.The Graduate SchoolSoka University of AmericaAliso ViejoUSA

Personalised recommendations