Advertisement

Spatial Production and Hybrid Placemaking in Marginalized Communities: An Academic Love Letter to Our Sons

  • Thu Sương Thị NguyễnEmail author
  • Brendan D. Maxcy
Living reference work entry

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors present approaches to spatial production introduced by Henri Lefebvre along with complementary concepts suggesting how these approaches may shed light on the hybrid placemaking practices in and by marginalized communities. Recognizing the centrality of placemaking to the displaced and dislocated, an overview introduces Lefebvre’s approach to space and key concepts that derive from his insights. The authors draw from a Vietnamese Language and Culture Program to illustrate Lefebvre’s spatial practices, representations of space, and the spatial imaginary. These include a look at dispersal practices in refugee resettlement, a reconsideration of the program portables, and a look at the politics of pseudo-natural boundaries. Further, highlighted are central ideas that connect to their own personal experiences of hybrid placemaking that foreground the way this work speaks beyond “intellectually worked out signs,” but also to the body and to our affective and political commitments. The authors conclude with a discussion of how hybrid placemaking – informed by theories of spatial production – may yield new insights toward more socially just education that may have been foreclosed in traditional approaches to space and place.

Keywords

Placemaking Hybrid placemaking Lefebvre Refugees Spatial production Spatial practices Representations of space Representational space/spatial imaginary Spaces of disrespect Spaces of denigration “Weapons of the weak” Periphery and center Reappropriation of space Marginal space Placemaking practices Productive resistance Spaces of deprivation Dislocations Sedimented practices “Pseudo-natural” boundaries (Dis)placement Agency Self-determination Lived space Perceived space Conceived space Alternative spatial practices “Undisciplined” laborers “Unruly” practices Space of lived parenthood Practice of love Socio-spatial arrangements Heritage language and culture 

References

  1. Baldwin, J. (1963). The fire next time. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Black, W. R. (2006) Constructing Accountability Performance for English Language Learner Students. Educational Policy 20(1), 197–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson, D. (1986). Teachers, class culture, and the politics of schooling. Interchange, 17(4), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dear, M. (1997). Postmodern bloodlines. In U. Strohmayer (Ed.), Space and social theory: Interpreting modernity and postmodernity (pp. 49–71). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Desbarats, J. (1986). Migration and resettlement: Policy influences on refugee resettlement patterns. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, 49–63.Google Scholar
  8. Do, H. D. (1999). The Vietnamese Americans. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon books.Google Scholar
  10. Gee, J. P. (1999). Literacies, schools, and kinds of people in the new capitalism. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey, D. (2009). Social justice and the city. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  14. hooks, b. (1990). Marginality as site of resistance. In C. West (Ed.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  15. Kondo, D. (2014). About face: Performing race in fashion and theater. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Malpas, J. E. (1999). Place and experience: A philosophical topography. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Massey, D. (1993). Politics and space/time. In M. K. S. Pile (Ed.), Place and the politics of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Maxcy, B. D., & Nguyễn, T. S. T. (2006). The politics of distributing leadership: Reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy, 20(1), 163–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nguyễn, T. S. T. (2006). “They don’t even know what Vietnam is!”: The production of space through hybrid placemaking and performativity in an urban public elementary school (Unpublished Dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  21. Nguyễn, T. S. T. (2010). Vietnamese diasporic placemaking: An ethnographic moment in uneven geographical development. Educational Policy, 24(1), 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nguyễn, T. S. T., & Maxcy, B. D. (2015). Revisiting distributed leadership: Examining the risks of “democratic” participation for an immigrant and refugee community. In J. Brooks & M. C. Brooks (Eds.), Urban educational leadership for social justice: International perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Nocon, H. (2005). Productive resistance: Lessons from after school about engaged noncompliance. American Journal of Education, 111, 191–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pillow, W. S. (2004). Unfit subjects: Educational policy and the teen mother. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radhakrishnan, R. (1993). Postcoloniality and the boundaries of identity. Callaloo, 16, 750–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rushdie, S. (1991). Imaginary homelands: Criticisms and essays 1981–1991. London: Granta books.Google Scholar
  28. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Shields, R. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Takaki, R. (1998). Strangers from a different shore: A history of Asian Americans. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  33. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thu Sương Thị Nguyễn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brendan D. Maxcy
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University–Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marta Sánchez
    • 1
  1. 1.Instructional Technology, Foundations, and Secondary EducationUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations