Advertisement

Advanced Pretreatment Strategies for Bioenergy Production from Biomass and Biowaste

  • C. Veluchamy
  • Ajay S. Kalamdhad
  • Brandon H. Gilroyed
Reference work entry

Abstract

Production of biowaste is increasing day by day, due to the abundant availability of raw materials and their utilities, especially from lignocellulosic-based material that constitutes 50% of the total biomass around the world. The recalcitrant structure of lignocellulose material has become resistant for their degradation and their recovery of valuable material. Many factors like lignin content, crystallinity of cellulose, and particle size limit the digestibility of hemicellulose and cellulose present in the lignocellulose material. To overcome the bottleneck, several pretreatment strategies have been employed to diminish the rate-limiting steps. They are generally classified as physical, chemical, and biological pretreatment. The physical pretreatments include mechanical (comminution, ultrasound, mechanical jet, high-pressure homogenizer), and thermal pretreatments (liquid hot water, autoclave, electrohydrolysis, microwave oven). The chemical pretreatments include acid, alkali, organosolv, wet oxidation, and ozonolysis pretreatment. The biological pretreatments (fungi, microbial consortia, enzyme pretreatment) or combined pretreatments (thermochemical or alkali thermochemical) are often employed nowadays. This chapter reviews the process description, mode of action, and challenges of several pretreatments. This chapter also discusses the future research needs of advanced pretreatment strategies for bioenergy production from biomaterial.

Keywords

Lignocellulose Pretreatment strategies Bioenergy Limiting factors Biodegradation 

References

  1. Agler MT, Wrenn BA, Zinder SH, Angenent LT (2011) Waste to bioproduct conversion with undefined mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform. Trends Biotechnol 29(2):70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alizadeh H, Teymouri F, Gilbert TI, Dale BE (2005) Pretreatment of switchgrass by ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 124(1):1133–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cara C, Ruiz E, Ballesteros M, Manzanares P, Negro MJ, Castro E (2008) Production of fuel ethanol from steam-explosion pretreated olive tree pruning. Fuel 87(6):692–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang VS, Holtzapple MT (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. In: Finkelstein M, Davison BH (eds) Twenty-first symposium on biotechnology for fuels and chemicals: proceedings of the twenty-first symposium on biotechnology for fuels and chemicals held May 2–6, 1999, in Fort Collins, Colorado. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cherubini F (2010) The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag 51:1412–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chum H, Black S, Johnson D, Sarkanen K, Robert D (1999) Organosolv pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of poplars: isolation and quantitative structural studies of lignins. Clean Techn Environ Policy 1(3):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Vries RP, Visser J (2001) Aspergillus enzymes involved in degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65(4):497–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenlauer M, Teipel U (2017) Comminution of biogenic materials. Can J Chem Eng 95(7):1236–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2013) International energy outlook 2013. [WWW Document]. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2013).pdf
  10. Eskicioglu C, Terzian N, Kennedy KJ, Droste RL, Hamoda M (2007) Athermal microwave effects for enhancing digestibility of waste activated sludge. Water Res 41(11):2457–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frigon J-C, Guiot SR (2010) Biomethane production from starch and lignocellulosic crops: a comparative review. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4(4):447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100(1):10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kabel MA, Bos G, Zeevalking J, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA (2007) Effect of pretreatment severity on xylan solubility and enzymatic breakdown of the remaining cellulose from wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 98(10):2034–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim KH, Hong J (2001) Supercritical CO2 pretreatment of lignocellulose enhances enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 77(2):139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim TH, Lee YY (2005) Pretreatment of corn stover by soaking in aqueous ammonia. In: Davison BH, Evans BR, Finkelstein M, Mcmillan JD (eds) Twenty-sixth symposium on biotechnology for fuels and chemicals. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 1119–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohlmann KL, Westgate PJ, Sarikaya A, Velayudhan A, Weil J, Hendrickson R, Ladisch MR (1995) Enhanced enzyme activities on hydrated lignocellulosic substrates. BTEC paper 127. In: 207th American Chemical Society National Meeting, ACS Symposium series No. 618. Enzymatic Degradation of Insoluble Carbohydrates, pp. 237–255Google Scholar
  17. Kratky L, Jirout T (2011) Biomass size reduction machines for enhancing biogas production. Chem Eng Technol 34(3):391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumakura M, Kaetsu I (1983) Effect of radiation pretreatment of bagasse on enzymatic and acid hydrolysis. Biomass 3(3):199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV (2008) Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(5):377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu C, Wyman CE (2003) The effect of flow rate of compressed hot water on xylan, lignin, and total mass removal from corn stover. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(21):5409–5416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mahmoud A, Olivier J, Vaxelaire J, Hoadley AFA (2010) Electrical field: a historical review of its application and contributions in wastewater sludge dewatering. Water Res 44(8):2381–2407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR (2005) Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1986–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muthangya M, Manoni Mshandete A, Kajumulo Kivaisi A (2009) Two-stage fungal pre-treatment for improved biogas production from sisal leaf decortication residues. Int J Mol Sci 10(11):4805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neely WC (1984) Factors affecting the pretreatment of biomass with gaseous ozone. Biotechnol Bioeng 26(1):59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Negro MJ, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Oliva JM, Cabañas A, Ballesteros M (2003) Hydrothermal pretreatment conditions to enhance ethanol production from poplar biomass. In: Davison BH, Lee JW, Finkelstein M, Mcmillan JD (eds) Biotechnology for fuels and chemicals: the twenty-fourth symposium. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabelo SC, Carrere H, Maciel Filho R, Costa AC (2011) Production of bioethanol, methane and heat from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol 102(17):7887–7895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramos LP (2003) The chemistry involved in the steam treatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quím Nova 26:863–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogalinski T, Ingram T, Brunner G (2008) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass in water under elevated temperatures and pressures. J Supercrit Fluids 47(1):54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roxburgh R, Soroushian F, Sieger R, Burrowes P (2005) Ultrasound for improved solids management – how, who, when and why. Water Environment Federation Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Residuals and Biosolids Management 13(13):956–968Google Scholar
  30. Saha M, Eskicioglu C, Marin J (2011) Microwave, ultrasonic and chemo-mechanical pretreatments for enhancing methane potential of pulp mill wastewater treatment sludge. Bioresour Technol 102(17):7815–7826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sawatdeenarunat C, Surendra K, Takara D, Oechsner H, Khanal SK (2015) Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 178:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taherzadeh M, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9(9):1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tarkow H, Feist WC (1969) A mechanism for improving the digestibility of lignocellulosic materials with dilute alkali and liquid ammonia. Cellulases Appl Adv Chem 95:197–218. American Chemical SocietyGoogle Scholar
  35. Thring RW, Chornet E, Overend RP (1990) Recovery of a solvolytic lignin: effects of spent liquor/acid volume ratio, acid concentration and temperature. Biomass 23(4):289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Varghese KS, Pandey MC, Radhakrishna K, Bawa AS (2014) Technology, applications and modelling of ohmic heating: a review. J Food Sci Technol 51(10):2304–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Veluchamy C, Kalalamdhad AS (2017) Prerequisite – a hot air oven pretreatment for anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose waste material. In: CSBE/SCGAB 2017 annual conference Canad Inns Polo Park. The Canadian Society for Bioengineering, Winnipeg, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  38. Veluchamy C, Kalamdhad AS (2017a) Biochemical methane potential test for pulp and paper mill sludge with different food/microorganisms ratios and its kinetics. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 117:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Veluchamy C, Kalamdhad AS (2017b) Enhanced methane production and its kinetics model of thermally pretreated lignocellulose waste material. Bioresour Technol 241:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veluchamy C, Kalamdhad AS (2017c) Enhancement of hydrolysis of lignocellulose waste pulp and paper mill sludge through different heating processes on thermal pretreatment. J Clean Prod 168:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veluchamy C, Kalamdhad AS (2017d) Influence of pretreatment techniques on anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill sludge: a review. Bioresour Technol 245:1206–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Veluchamy C, Kalamdhad AS (2017e) A mass diffusion model on the effect of moisture content for solid-state anaerobic digestion. J Clean Prod 162:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veluchamy C, Raju VW, Kalamdhad AS (2017) Prerequisite–an electrohydrolysis pretreatment for anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose waste material. Bioresour Technol 235:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vidal PF, Molinier J (1988) Ozonolysis of lignin – improvement of in vitro digestibility of poplar sawdust. Biomass 16(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Viola E, Zimbardi F, Cardinale M, Cardinale G, Braccio G, Gambacorta E (2008) Processing cereal straws by steam explosion in a pilot plant to enhance digestibility in ruminants. Bioresour Technol 99(4):681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weil JR, Brewer M, Hendrickson R, Sarikaya A, Ladisch MR (1997) Continuous pH monitoring during pretreatment of yellow poplar wood sawdust by pressure cooking in water. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 68:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weil JR, Sarikaya A, Rau S-L, Goetz J, Ladisch CM, Brewer M, Hendrickson R, Ladisch MR (1998) Pretreatment of corn fiber by pressure cooking in water. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 73(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang B, Wyman CE (2008) Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2(1):26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yu G, Yano S, Inoue H, Inoue S, Endo T, Sawayama S (2010a) Pretreatment of rice straw by a hot-compressed water process for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160(2):539–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu Q, Zhuang X, Yuan Z, Wang Q, Qi W, Wang W, Zhang Y, Xu J, Xu H (2010b) Two-step liquid hot water pretreatment of Eucalyptus grandis to enhance sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4895–4899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang Q, He J, Tian M, Mao Z, Tang L, Zhang J, Zhang H (2011) Enhancement of methane production from cassava residues by biological pretreatment using a constructed microbial consortium. Bioresour Technol 102(19):8899–8906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhen G, Lu X, Li Y-Y, Zhao Y (2014) Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy 128(Suppl C):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zheng Y, Lin HM, Tsao GT (1998) Pretreatment for cellulose hydrolysis by carbon dioxide explosion. Biotechnol Prog 14(6):890–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y (2014) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci 42:35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhong W, Zhang Z, Luo Y, Sun S, Qiao W, Xiao M (2011) Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production. Bioresour Technol 102(24):11177–11182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Veluchamy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ajay S. Kalamdhad
    • 1
  • Brandon H. Gilroyed
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.School of Environmental ScienceUniversity of Guelph Ridgetown CampusRidgetownCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Environmental SciencesNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations