Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Peter T. Bobrowsky, Brian Marker


  • Andrea ManconiEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9_208


Systematic use of quantitative approaches and/or measuring devices to observe changes which may occur over time in the state of a system.


Observation is the mainstay of the Galilean method (Fisher 1993). To determine the range of variability of a specific phenomenon under investigation, the observation has to be repeated over time, in a systematic fashion, and by considering straightforward quantitative approaches. This process is usually referred to as monitoring.

In the past the unique sources of observation were human eyes; however, monitoring today is mostly undertaken using devices able to record quantitative measurements of one or more physical parameters. In general, when measurements are aimed at performing provisional analyses, the data acquired with monitoring instruments are jointly investigated and/or properly combined with significant information of the same target area. Regarding engineering geology applications, this approach is achieved by...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bell S (2001) Measurement good practice guide no. 11 (issue 2), A beginner’s Guide to Uncertainty of Measurement. Natl. Phys. Lab, TeddingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell FG (2004) Engineering geology and construction. Spon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Capra L, Macías JL, Cortés A, Dávila N, Saucedo R, Osorio-Ocampo S, Arce JL, Gavilanes-Ruiz JC, Corona-Chávez P, García-Sánchez L, Sosa-Ceballos G, Vázquez R (2016) Preliminary report on the July 10–11, 2015 eruption at Volcán de Colima: pyroclastic density currents with exceptional runouts and volume. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 310:39–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunnicliff J (1988) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher W (1993) Galileo and scientific method. Rasch Meas Trans 6(4):256–257Google Scholar
  6. Giordan D, Allasia P, Manconi A, Baldo M, Santangelo M, Cardinali M, Corazza A, Albanese V, Lollino G, Guzzetti F (2013) Morphological and kinematic evolution of a large earthflow: the Montaguto landslide, Southern Italy. Geomorphology 187:61–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Intrieri E, Gigli G, Casagli N, Nadim F (2013) Brief communication “Landslide Early Warning System: toolbox and general concepts”. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:85–90.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-85-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kajzar V, Doležalová H, Souček K, Staš L (2011) Aerial photogrammetry observation of the subsidence depression near Karviná. Acta Geodyn Geomater 8:309–317Google Scholar
  9. Loew S, Lützenkirchen V, Hansmann J, Ryf A, Guntli P (2015) Transient surface deformations caused by the Gotthard Base Tunnel. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:82–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lollino G, Manconi A, Giordan D, Allasia P, Baldo M (2015) Infrastructure in geohazard contexts: the importance of automatic and near-real-time monitoring. In: Culshaw MG, Osipov VI, Booth SJ, Victorov AS (eds) Environmental security of the European cross-border energy supply infrastructure. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 73–89Google Scholar
  11. Manconi A, Walter TR, Amelung F (2007) Effects of mechanical layering on volcano deformation. Geophys J Int 170:952–958.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03449.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manconi A, Casu F, Ardizzone F, Bonano M, Cardinali M, De Luca C, Gueguen E, Marchesini I, Parise M, Vennari C et al (2014) Brief communication: rapid mapping of event landslides: the 3 December 2013 Montescaglioso landslide (Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discuss 2:1465–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore JR, Gischig V, Button E, Loew S (2010) Rockslide deformation monitoring with fiber optic strain sensors. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:191–201.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-191-2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Price DG, De Freitas MH (2009) Engineering geology: principles and practice. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Przyłucka M, Herrera G, Graniczny M, Colombo D, Béjar-Pizarro M (2015) Combination of conventional and advanced DInSAR to monitor very fast mining subsidence with TerraSAR-X data: Bytom City (Poland). Remote Sens 7:5300–5328.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70505300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wasowski J, Bovenga F (2014) Investigating landslides and unstable slopes with satellite multi temporal interferometry: current issues and future perspectives. Eng Geol 174:103–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wieczorek GF, Snyder JB (2009) Monitoring slope movements. Young R, Norby Geol. Monit. Boulder Colo. Geol Soc Am Bull, pp 245–271Google Scholar
  18. Yu H, Lu X, Cheng G, Ge X (2011) Detection and volume estimation of mining subsidence based on multi-temporal LiDAR data, in: 2011 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics. Presented at the 2011 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/GeoInformatics.2011.5980892

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZurichSwitzerland