Advertisement

Communication, Identity, and Power in the Horse World

  • Pauliina RaentoEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter offers an introduction to the Horse language(s) and thereby encourages investigation into nonverbal and interspecies communication, other-than-human agency, and their relationship with social trust and fieldwork in (language) geography. The emphasis is on human Horse, that is, a jargon that varies geographically, socially, and functionally. It is place- and situation-specific but understood worldwide. The numerous (partially overlapping) subcultures have particular socioeconomic and gender profiles with distinctive identities and complex power relations reflected and reproduced in speech and performance. Yet, the equine serves as a common point of reference for this language, cocreates community, and fosters global networks where humans communicate with one another across linguistic and other boundaries. The internal diversity, unity, and places of Horse as constituents of identity and power are discussed. The examination expands scholarly understanding of how sociocultural and professional status is established, tradition maintained, and knowledge transferred without words and through naming. The reader learns how competence in verbal and nonverbal Horse builds cultural capital and social trust and manages boundaries between “us” and “them.” The reader is challenged to think beyond human agency, spoken and written communication, and customary ways of learning, teaching, and doing fieldwork.

Keywords

Communication Horses Human–animal relationships Identity Jargon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The chapter is part of the Author’s “The Horse in Finland: Society, Language, and Culture” project, supported by the Kone Foundation (2014–2018), Ypäjä Equine College, and Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Research RELATE at the Tampere University (# 307348, 2017–2019).

Supplementary material

Video 1

Basic stable manners taught, and tasks given, to a foal include wearing a halter, staying calm when handled alone before weaning, standing still, accepting tying, cross-tying (attachment to a structure on both sides), touching in all parts of the body, and accepting brushing and other forms of grooming and treatment. On the video, students of grooming at Ypäjä Equine College in Finland brush a 6-month-old Finnhorse filly Ypäjä Onerva, whose future work will be in riding, education, and, later, in breeding because of her pedigree. The daily exercises are kept short and encouraging. (Video by the author) (MP4 249576 kb)

Video 2

Chief instructor (now Director) Markus Scharmann of the German Olympic equestrian training center at Warendorf is a requested instructor for show-jumping clinics. On the video, he trains a group of riding majors at Ypäjä Equine College in southwestern Finland. The example shows how feedback from an experienced riding coach gradually improves the student’s and her horse’s performance. (Video by the author) (MP4 402464 kb)

Video 3

A longe/lunge line is a useful piece of equipment in several situations. In addition to a rigorous training exercise of a (riding) horse, it is customarily used in veterinarian examinations of lameness or the symmetry of a horse’s movement. It also is a way to illustrate a horse’s behavior and style of moving in a sales situation. The video from a manége (riding hall) exemplifies two styles of using the longe/lunge line. In the front, a Finnhorse trotter is presented by a groom to a veterinarian who observes the horse’s free movement on a soft surface for insurance and sales purposes. In the background, a riding horse is being longed/lunged in a controlled training exercise, in trot and canter. (Video by the author) (MP4 234111 kb)

Video 4

The level of competence in interspecies communication is measured, and peer respect is earned, in equine sport competitions of various sorts. On the video, a Western rider and her three-year-old (working/reigned) cow horse (a stock horse) perform cow work in a Snaffle Bit Futurity contest by the National Reined Cow Horse Association in Reno, Nevada (southwestern USA). The cow released to the arena is first “boxed” (held) in one end of the arena. The next task is to “fence” the cow: to run the cow on the rail toward the other end of the arena and turn him around without help from a structure (such as a fence). The final step is “circling”: the cow is moved in the center of the arena in tight circles, in two directions. The audience response and the rider’s body language confirm satisfaction with the performance. (Video by the author. For competition rules, vocabulary, and more videos and information, see NRCHA’s official website at http://nrcha.com/) (MP4 135887 kb)

Video 5

One illustrative example of a ritualistic place- and role-specific “voice” is the performance of a broker in a horse auction. On the video, a chestnut thoroughbred filly is sold in a Tattersalls yearling auction in Newmarket, England. The sales catalog has details of each foal and their lineage. The prices are still marked in guineas but converted immediately to contemporary pounds and several other currencies on the electronic board behind the broker. Examples of internationally standardized sales catalogs and information on this major European bloodstock auctioneer can be found at http://www.tattersalls.com/. (Video by the author) (MP4 337779 kb)

References

  1. Bale, J. (1989). Sports geography (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Berglund, S. (2006). Vägen till vinnarcirkeln. Travhästen och dess människor mellan sport och spel. Möklinta: Gidlunds.Google Scholar
  3. Binde, P. (2011). Trotting territory. The cultural realm of Swedish horse betting. In P. Raento & D. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Gambling, space, and time. Shifting boundaries and cultures (pp. 107–128). Reno and Las Vegas: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blazer, E. (2011). To longe, lunge, or lounge? http://www.thewayofhorses.com/11_11_longe_lunge.html. Accessed 25 August 2017.
  5. Cassidy, R. (2002). The sport of kings. Kinship, class and thoroughbred breeding in Newmarket. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassidy, R. (2007). Horse people. Thoroughbred culture in Lexington and Newmarket. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cassidy, R. (Ed.). (2013). The Cambridge companion to horseracing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D. K. (2001). Veterinary geography as interdisciplinary research. The Geographical Review, 91(1–2), 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delph-Janiurek, T. (1999). Sounding gender(ed): Vocal performances in English university teaching spaces. Gender, Place and Culture, 6(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delph-Janiurek, T. (2000). ‘Walking the walk and talking the talk’: Bodies, conversation, gender and power in higher education in England. Social and Cultural Geography, 1(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delph-Janiurek, T. (2001). (Un)consensual conversations: Betweenness, ‘material access’, laughter and reflexivity in research. Area, 33(4), 414–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desbiens, C., & Ruddick, S. (2006). Speaking of geography: Language, power, and the spaces of Anglo-Saxon ‘hegemony’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desforges, L., & Jones, R. (2001). Geographies of languages/Languages of geography. Social and Cultural Geography, 2(3), 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckert, P. (2002). Demystifying sexuality and desire. In K. Campbell-Kibler, R. J. Podesva, S. J. Roberts, & A. Wong (Eds.), Language and sexuality: Contesting meaning in theory and practice (pp. 99–110). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of socio-linguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elbl, I. (1991). The horse in fifteenth-century Senegambia. The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 24(1), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Häkli, J., & Minca, C. (Eds.). (2009). Social capital and urban networks of trust. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Hobson, K. (2007). Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography. Political Geography, 26(3), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holland, T. J. (1990). The nicknames of steam-era railroaders: A code-mediated adaptation. Names, 38(4), 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horse Naming Policy/Intellectual Property Policy. (2017). Dated December 4, 2017. Sydney: Racing Australia. https://racingaustralia.horse/RoR/Forms/Horse_Naming_Policy.pdf
  21. Kalske, M. (2005). Suomessa syntyneiden hevosten nimistö [The names of horses born in Finland]. Turun yliopisto, Suomalaisen ja yleisen kielitieteen laitoksen julkaisuja, 73. Turku.Google Scholar
  22. Karekallas, M., Raento, P., & Renkonen, T. (2014). Diffusion and learning: Twenty years of sports betting culture in Finland. UNLV Gambling Research and Review Journal, 18(1), 25–50.Google Scholar
  23. Kyrklund, K., & Lemkow, J. (2013). Dressyr med Kyra. Rid med system, logik och konsekvens. 3rd, rev. ed. Västerås: Ica.Google Scholar
  24. Mandel, J. L. (2003). Negotiating expectations in the field: Gatekeepers, research fatigue and cultural biases. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(2), 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonnell, S. (2003). The equid ethogram. A practical field guide to horse behavior. Lexington, KY: Eclipse Press.Google Scholar
  26. McGreevy, P. (2012). Equine behavior. A guide for veterinarians and equine scientists (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: W. B. Saunders/Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. McManus, P., Albrecht, G., & Graham, R. (2013). The global horseracing industry. Social, economic, environmental and ethical perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Myers, G. A. (2001). Protecting privacy in foreign fields. The Geographical Review, 91(1–2), 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nevison, D., & Ashford, D. (2008). No easy money. A gambler’s diary. Newbury: Racing Post.Google Scholar
  30. Raento, P. (2016a). A geopolitics of the horse in Finland. Geopolitics, 21(4), 945–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raento, P. (2016b). “It’s like any business”: Learning, work, and risk management among skilled horse bettors. A paper presented on June 8 at the 16th International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  32. Raento, P. (2017). Geopolitics, identity, and horse sports in Finland. In N. Koch (Ed.), Critical geographies of sport. Place, power and sport in a global perspective (pp. 15–31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Raento, P., & Härmälä, L. (2014). The contested structural change in Finnish trotter racing and betting in the 2000s. In P. Raento (Ed.), Gambling in Finland. Themes and data for qualitative research (pp. 125–152). Helsinki: Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Roberts, M. (2002). From my hands to yours. Lessons from a lifetime of training championship horses. Solvang, CA: Monty and Pat Roberts.Google Scholar
  35. Rosecrance, J. D. (1985). The degenerates of Lake Tahoe. A study of persistence in the social world of horse race gambling. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Stevens, S. (2001). Fieldwork as commitment. The Geographical Review, 91(1–2), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suomen Hippos. (2018). Unpublished professional license holder statistics of the national Trotting and Breeding Association of Finland. Accessed on March 28. http://www.hippos.fi.
  38. Swart, S. (2010). Horses in the South African War, c. 1899–1902. Society and Animals, 18(4), 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thorell, G., Hedenborg, S., Stråhlman, O., & Morgan, K. (2018). From giving orders to engaging in dialogue: Military norms being challenged at the Swedish riding school. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(4), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Watson, E. E. (2004). ‘What a dolt one is’: Language learning and fieldwork in geography. Area, 36(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, B. S., & Skipper, J. K., Jr. (1990). Nicknames and women professional basketball players. Names, 38(4), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculties of Management and CommunicationTampere UniversityTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations