Advertisement

Mutating and Contested Languages of Wine: Heard on the Grapevine

  • David InglisEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Language is thoroughly bound up with wine in myriad ways, and the drinking of wine is very often accompanied with talk about it. This chapter considers the nature of wine tasting languages; the differences and rivalry between wine talk (of critics and suchlike persons) and wine language (of scientists and their allies in the wine world); how wine language is bound up with the creation of social hierarchies and senses of commonality among wine drinkers; contemporary trends towards hyper-specificity in wine vocabularies; and the changing nature of the argots in and through which wine is sold and labelled. In so doing, the chapter stresses the constantly changing, conflict-laden, and often contradictory and paradoxical nature of talk and language related to wine and wine drinking.

Keywords

Wine Tasting Alcohol Labels Appreciation Connoisseurship Sociology 

References

  1. Allen, M. P., & Germov, J. (2010). Judging taste and creating value: The cultural consecration of Australian wines. Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 35–51.Google Scholar
  2. Atkin, T., & Thach, L. (2012). Millennial wine consumers: Risk perception and information search. Wine Economics and Policy, 1(1), 54–62.Google Scholar
  3. Atkin, T. S., Garcia, R., & Lockshin, L. S. (2007). A multidimensional study of the diffusion of a discontinuous innovation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 14(2), 17–33.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, B. (1967). Opimian wine. American Journal of Philology, 88(2), 173–175.Google Scholar
  5. Ballestrini, P., & Gamble, P. (2006). Country of origin effects on Chinese wine consumers. British Food Journal, 108(5), 396–412.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, N., & Almanza, B. A. (2006). Influence of wine packaging on consumers’ decision to purchase. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 9(4), 83–98.Google Scholar
  7. Barber, N., Ismail, J., & Taylor, D. C. (2007). Label fluency and consumer self-confidence. Journal of Wine Research, 18(2), 73–85.Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bosker, B. (2015). Is there a better way to talk about wine? The New Yorker, July 29. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/is-there-a-better-way-to-talk-about-wine
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Celhay, F., & Trinquecoste, J. F. (2008). Pourquoi est-il difficile de “sortir” des codes graphiques du vin français? Market Management, 8(1), 6–30.Google Scholar
  12. Celhay, F., & Trinquecoste, J. F. (2017). Package graphic design: Investigating the variables that moderate consumer response to atypical designs. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 32(2), 46–70.Google Scholar
  13. Chaney, I. M. (2000). External search effort for wine. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 12(2), 5–21.Google Scholar
  14. Charters, S., Lockshin, L., & Unwin, T. (2000). Consumer responses to wine bottle back labels.The Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal of Oenology, Viticulture, Finance and Marketing, 15(3), 94–101.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, M., Nanda, G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The future of French wine: Overcoming ‘Terroirisme’ and stagnation. Knowledge @ Wharton, Jan 2nd. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-future-of-french-wine-overcoming-terroirisme-and-stagnation/
  16. Colman, T. (2010). Wine politics. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. David, E. (2009). An omelette and a glass of wine. London: Grub Street Press.Google Scholar
  18. Delmas, M. A., & Lessem, N. (2017). Eco-premium or eco-penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine. Market, Busines & Society, 56(2), 318–356.Google Scholar
  19. Domingos, N. (2016). The market as mediator: The corporate creation of Portuguese wine. Gastronomica, 16(3), 31–43.Google Scholar
  20. Eden, S. (2011). Food labels as boundary objects: How consumers make sense of organic and functional foods. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 179–194.Google Scholar
  21. Elliot, S., & Barth, J. (2012). Wine label design and personality preferences of millennials. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(3), 183–191.Google Scholar
  22. Finkelstein, J., & Quiazon, R. (2007). Liquid images: Viewing the wine label. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 14(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  23. Guy, K. M. (1999). “Oiling the wheels of social life”: Myths and marketing in champagne during the Belle Epoque. French Historical Studies, 22(2), 211–239.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, J., & Lockshin, L. (2000). Using means-end chains for analysing occasions-not buyers. Australian Marketing Journal, 8(1), 45–54.Google Scholar
  26. Hampton, R. (2012). The vines that bind: Wine’s unifying qualities. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(10), 852–861.Google Scholar
  27. Hennion, A. (2007). Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 97–114.Google Scholar
  28. Howland, P. J. (2013). Distinction by proxy: The democratization of fine wine. Journal of Sociology, 49(2–3), 325–340.Google Scholar
  29. Ilbery, B., Morris, C., Buller, H., Maye, D., & Kneafsey, M. (2005). Product, process and place: An examination of food marketing and labelling schemes in Europe and North America. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(2), 116–132.Google Scholar
  30. Inglis, D. (2019) Wine globalization: Longer-term dynamics and contemporary patterns. In D. Inglis, & A.-M. Almila (Eds.), The globalization of wine. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  31. Jarvis, W., & Goodman, S. (2005). Effective marketing of small brands – Niche positions, attribute loyalty and direct marketing. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(5), 292–299.Google Scholar
  32. Jarvis, W., Mueller, S., & Chiong, K. (2010). A latent analysis of images and words in wine choice. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 18(3), 138–144.Google Scholar
  33. Jennings, D., & Wood, C. (1994). Wine: Achieving competitive advantage through design. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 6(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
  34. Le Bel, J. L. (2005). Sensory, snob, and sex appeals in wine advertising. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 17(3), 67–78.Google Scholar
  35. Lehrer, A. (1975). Talking about wine. Language, 51(4), 901–923.Google Scholar
  36. Lukacs, P. (2002). Inventing wine. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Matthews, M. A. (2015). Terroir and other myths of winegrowing. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. McCoy, E. (2005). The emperor of wine. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  39. Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (1996). The mis-remembrance of wines past: Verbal and perceptual expertise differentially mediate verbal overshadowing of taste memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 231–245.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997). Mobilizing the consumer: Assembling the subject of consumption. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
  41. Mueller, S. & Lockshin, L. (2008). How important is wine packaging for consumers? On the reliability of measuring attribute importance with direct verbal versus indirect visual methods. In 4th International Conference of the Academy of Wine Business Research, Siena 17–19th July 2008. http://academyofwinebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/How-important-is-wine-packaging-for-consumers_paper.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2018.
  42. Neethling, B. (2017). The role of anthroponymic commemoration on wine labels in South Africa. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 65(2), 65–77.Google Scholar
  43. Olin, L. (2014). The Terroir of Bacchus: The landscape of wine. SiteLines, 10(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
  44. Overton, J., & Banks, G. (2015). Conspicuous production: Wine, capital and status. Capital & Class, 39(3), 473–491.Google Scholar
  45. Parga-Dans, E., & Gonzalez, P. A. (2017). ‘Marketing quality’ in the food sector: Towards a critical engagement with the ‘quality turn’ in wine. Geoforum, 85, 5–8.Google Scholar
  46. Peterson, K. (2014). The snob effect of red wine: Estimating consumer bias in experimental blind wine tastings. The American Economist, 59(1), 76–89.Google Scholar
  47. Phillips, C. J. (2016). The taste machine: Sense, subjectivity, and statistics in the California wine world. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 461–481.Google Scholar
  48. Ponte, S., & Gibbon, P. (2005). Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Economy and Society, 34(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  49. Potter, S. (1952). One-upmanship. London: Rupert Hart-Davis.Google Scholar
  50. Quandt, R. E. (2007). On wine bullshit: Some new software. Journal of Wine Economics, 2(2), 129–135.Google Scholar
  51. Rahman, I., Stumpf, T., & Reynolds, D. (2014). A comparison of the influence of purchaser attitudes and product attributes on organic wine preferences. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 127–134.Google Scholar
  52. Randerson, J. (2001). I’m getting redcurrants with just a hint of baloney. A whiff of untruth. New Scientist, 172(2315), 17–17.Google Scholar
  53. Rocchi, B., & Stefani, G. (2006). Consumers’ perception of wine packaging: A case study. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 18(1), 33–44.Google Scholar
  54. Sepeau Ivaldi, M. (2017). La Commission privilégie l’autoréglementation. París: Vitisphere.Google Scholar
  55. Shapin, S. (2012). The juice: Vinous Veritas by Jay McInerney – Review. The Guardian, May 2. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/may/02/the-juice-jay-mcinerney-review
  56. Smith Maguire, J. (2010). Provenance and the liminality of production and consumption: The case of wine promoters. Marketing Theory, 10(3), 269–282.Google Scholar
  57. Smith Maguire, J. (2018). The taste for the particular: A logic of discernment in an age of omnivorousness. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
  58. Spawton, T. (1991). Market planning for wine. European Journal of Marketing, 25(3), 19–31.Google Scholar
  59. Sutanonpaiboon, J., & Atkin, T. (2012). Using region to market wine to international consumers. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 18(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  60. Tang, V. C. M., Tchetchik, A., & Cohen, E. (2015). Perception of wine labels by Hong Kong Chinese consumers. Wine Economics and Policy, 4(1), 12–21.Google Scholar
  61. Teil, G. (2017). Protecting appellations of origin: One hundred years of efforts and debates. In W. van Caenegem & J. Cleary (Eds.), The importance of place: Geographical indications as a tool for local and regional development (pp. 147–171). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Thach, L. (2009). Wine 2.0 – The next phase of wine marketing? Exploring US winery adoption of wine 2.0 components. Journal of Wine Research, 20(2), 143–157.Google Scholar
  63. Thach, L. (2012). Time for wine? Identifying differences in wine-drinking occasions for male and female wine consumers. Journal of Wine Research. 23(2), 134–154.Google Scholar
  64. Unwin, T. (1999). Hedonic price index and the qualities of wine. Journal of Wine Research, 10(2), 95–104.Google Scholar
  65. Van Tonder, E. M., & Mulder, D. (2015). Marketing communication for organic wine: Semiotic guidelines for wine bottle front labels. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 41(1), 131–151.Google Scholar
  66. Vannini, P., Ahluwalia-Lopez, G., Waskul, D., & Simon Gottschalk, S. (2010). Performing taste at wine festivals: A somatic layered account of material culture. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(5), 378–396.Google Scholar
  67. Veseth, M. (2012). Wine wars. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  68. Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 311–333.Google Scholar
  69. Zucco, G. M. (2011). Labeling, identification, and recognition of wine-relevant odorants in expert sommeliers, intermediates, and untrained wine drinkers. Perception, 40(5), 598–607.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations