Advertisement

Cosmetics and Skin Care Products

  • Faheem LatheefEmail author
  • Mark Wilkinson
Living reference work entry
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Cosmetics have become ubiquitous and form part of daily life for many. With this rapid proliferation and diversification of cosmetic products, we have seen a corresponding increase in the number of cases of contact dermatitis to these products. In this chapter, we will explore this in more detail, by examining the definition of a cosmetic, the epidemiology, and clinical features and highlighting both old and newer cosmetic products and allergens reported to cause contact allergy. We will finish by exploring how and what to test to, in order to cover these exposures as well as what to tell the patient.

Keywords

Cosmetics Personal care products Irritant reactions Sensitive skin Contact allergy 

References

  1. 1.
    Corazza M et al (2018) Side effects of tango: connubial contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 80:241–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Food and Drug Administration (2018) [cited 2018 01/10/2018]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/guidanceregulation/lawsregulations/ucm074162.htm
  3. 3.
    Orton DI, Wilkinson JD (2004) Cosmetic allergy: incidence, diagnosis, and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 5(5):327–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith VM, Clark SM, Wilkinson M (2016) Cosmetics. In: Johansen JD, Lepoittevin JP, Thyssen JP (eds) Quick guide to contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sedlewicz LB (2005) Cosmetic preservatives: friend or foe? SKINmed 4(2):98–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database (2011) [01/10/2018]. Available from: http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/research
  7. 7.
    Diepgen T et al (2016) Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 174(2):319–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vigan M (1997) New allergens in cosmetics. Cosmetovigilance. Ann Dermatol Venereol 124(8):571–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Groot AC et al (1988) The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Contact Dermatitis 19(3):195–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goossens A (2011) Contact-allergic reactions to cosmetics. J Allergy (Cairo) 2011:467071Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher AA (1990) “Status cosmeticus”: a cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Cutis 46(2):109–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willis CM et al (2001) Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 145(2):258–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Misery L et al (2014) A new ten-item questionnaire for assessing sensitive skin: the Sensitive Scale-10. Acta Derm Venereol 94(6):635–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taieb C et al (2014) Sensitive skin in Brazil and Russia: an epidemiological and comparative approach. Eur J Dermatol 24(3):372–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pons-Guiraud A (2004) Sensitive skin: a complex and multifactorial syndrome. J Cosmet Dermatol 3(3):145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH (1998) Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermat 9(3):170–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foley P et al (1993) The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population-based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia. Br J Dermatol 128(5):512–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wakelin SH (2001) Contact urticaria. Clin Exp Dermatol 26(2):132–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansen JD et al (2015) European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing – recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 73(4):195–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siegfried E, Hebert A (2015) Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis: mimics, overlaps, and complications. J Clin Med 4(5):884–917PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang AJ, Warshaw EM (2018) Pet consort dermatitis: the importance of asking about pets. Dermatitis 29(1):45–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jensen P et al (2012) Connubial allergic contact dermatitis caused by fragrance ingredients. Dermatitis 23(1):e1–e2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Latheef F et al (2015) A severe irritant reaction to antiseptic bath emollient. InnovAiT 8(11):701–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loo WJ (2003) Irritant dermatitis due to prolonged contact with Oilatum Plus. Br J Dermatol 148(1):171–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deza G, Giménez-Arnau AM (2017) Allergic contact dermatitis in preservatives: current standing and future options. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 17(4):263–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Minamoto K (2010) Skin sensitizers in cosmetics and skin care products. Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Jpn J Hyg 65(1):20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laden K (1999) Antiperspirants and deodorants. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zirwas MJ (2019) Contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 56(1):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaffer MP, Williford PM, Sherertz EF (2000) An old reaction in a new setting: the paraben paradox. Am J Contact Dermat 11(3):189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bruzzoniti MC et al (2017) Chromium, nickel, and cobalt in cosmetic matrices: an integrated bioanalytical characterization through total content, bioaccessibility, and Cr(III)/Cr(VI) speciation. Anal Bioanal Chem 409(29):6831–6841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilkinson M, Orton D (2017) Acrylate allergy: time to intervene. Contact Dermatitis 77(6):353–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Knopp E, Watsky K (2008) Eyelid dermatitis: Contact allergy to 3-(dimethylamino) propylamine. Dermatitis 19(6):328PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alessandrini A, Piraccini B (2016) Essential of hair care cosmetics. Cosmetics 3(4):34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gach JE, Stone NM, Finch TM (2005) A series of four cases of allergic contact dermatitis to phthalic anhydride/trimellitic anhydride/glycols copolymer in nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis 53(1):63–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chowdhury MM, Statham BN (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from dibutyl phthalate and benzalkonium chloride in Timodine cream. Contact Dermatitis 46(1):57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Spencer A, Gazzani P, Thompson DA (2016) Acrylate and methacrylate contact allergy and allergic contact disease: a 13-year review. Contact Dermatitis 75(3):157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomson KF, Wilkinson SM (2000) Allergic contact dermatitis to plant extracts in patients with cosmetic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 142(1):84–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schnuch A et al (2012) Surveillance of contact allergies: methods and results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Allergy 67(7):847–857PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poulsen PB, Strandesen M (2011) Survey and health assessment of cosmetic products marketed as “non-preserved”. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Werbrouck J, Lambrecht C, Goossens A (2015) C12-15 alkyl benzoate: a new cosmetic allergen? Contact Dermatitis 73(4):249–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gallo R et al (2016) Scutellaria baicalensis extract: a novel botanical allergen in cosmetic products? Contact Dermatitis 75(6):387–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    de Groot A, Jagtman BA, Woutersen M (2017) Contact allergy to neem oil. Dermatitis 28(6):360–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fasth IM, Ulrich NH, Johansen JD (2018) Ten-year trends in contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers. Contact Dermatitis 79(5):263–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hauksson I et al (2016) Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 74(3):145–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gimenez-Arnau AM et al (2017) Contact allergy to preservatives: ESSCA∗ results with the baseline series, 2009–2012. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31(4):664–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kamstrup MR et al (2017) Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile is still of clinical relevance. Contact Dermatitis 77(4):250–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Latheef F, Wilkinson SM (2015) Methylisothiazolinone outbreak in the European Union. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 15(5):461–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Urwin R et al (2017) Methylisothiazolinone: the epidemic is declining – but not gone. Contact Dermatitis 76(5):301–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gallo R et al (2016) Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy – are rinse-off cosmetics and household products relevant sources of exposure? Contact Dermatitis 75(5):319–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Flury U, Palmer A, Nixon R (2018) The methylisothiazolinone contact allergy epidemic in Australia. Contact Dermatitis 79(3):189–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Opstrup MS et al (2015) Chlorhexidine in cosmetic products – a market survey. Contact Dermatitis 72(1):55–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wong CS, Beck MH (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from triclosan in antibacterial handwashes. Contact Dermatitis 45(5):307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Field S et al (2007) Allergic contact dermatitis from tertiary-butylhydroquinone and Laureth 12 in a hair dye. Contact Dermatitis 56(2):116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Corazza M et al (2012) Vitamin E contact allergy: a controversial subject. Dermatitis 23(4):167–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schneller-Pavelescu L et al (2019) “Crossed” allergic contact dermatitis caused by oxidized vitamin K1 in a patient previously sensitized to non-oxidized vitamin K1. Contact Dermatitis 80(1):64–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Holcomb ZE, Van Noord MG, Atwater AR (2017) Gallate contact dermatitis: product update and systematic review. Dermatitis 28(2):115–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fernandes RA et al (2018) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by dexpanthenol-probably a frequent allergen. Contact Dermatitis 79(5):276–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Andersen KE (2015) Hesperidin methyl chalcone – a new cosmetic contact allergen. Contact Dermatitis 72(6):402–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rodrigues DF, Goulart EM (2016) Patch-test results in children and adolescents: systematic review of a 15-year period. An Bras Dermatol 91(1):64–72PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ozkaya E, Kilic S (2018) Polyethylene glycol as marker for nitrofurazone allergy: 20 years of experience from Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 78(3):211–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fisher AA, Pascher F, Kanof NB (1971) Allergic contact dermatitis due to ingredients of vehicles: a vehicle tray for patch testing. Arch Dermatol 104(3):286–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fransen M et al (2018) Contact allergy to lanolin: temporal changes in prevalence and association with atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 78(1):70–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mertens S, Gilissen L, Goossens A (2016) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cocamide diethanolamine. Contact Dermatitis 75(1):20–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Corazza M et al (2016) Contact sensitization to emulsifying agents: an underrated issue? Dermatitis 27(5):276–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bhoyrul B et al (2019) Patch testing with alkyl glucosides: concomitant reactions are common but not ubiquitous. Contact Dermatitis 80(5):286–290.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13186. Epub 2018 DecPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Boucneau F et al (2018) Arachidyl glucoside: another cosmetic allergen. Contact Dermatitis 79(5):321–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bennike NH, Johansen JD (2016) Sorbitan sesquioleate; a rare cause of contact allergy in consecutively patch tested dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis 74(4):242–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yokota M et al (2007) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by tosylamide formaldehyde resin in nail varnish: an old allergen that has not disappeared. Contact Dermatitis 57(4):277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Teik-Jin Goon A et al (2007) Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 57(1):21–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Montgomery R, Stocks SJ, Wilkinson SM (2016) Contact allergy resulting from the use of acrylate nails is increasing in both users and those who are occupationally exposed. Contact Dermatitis 74(2):120–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Goon AT et al (2008) Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 59(5):307–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Aerts O, Verhulst L, Goossens A (2016) Ethylhexylglycerin: a low-risk, but highly relevant, sensitizer in ‘hypo-allergenic’ cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 74(5):281–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mangodt EA et al (2019) Capryloyl glycine: a polyfunctional cosmetic ingredient and potential skin sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 80(6):400–402.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13215. Epub 2019 Feb 27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Natkunarajah J, Ostlere L (2008) Allergic contact dermatitis to idebenone in an over-the-counter anti-ageing cream. Contact Dermatitis 58(4):239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Jacob SE et al (2016) Benzoate allergy in children – from foods to personal hygiene products. Pediatr Dermatol 33(2):213–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Leysen J et al (2014) Polyhexamethylene biguanide is a relevant sensitizer in wet wipes. Contact Dermatitis 70(5):323–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Vandeweghe J, Decoster E, Lapeere H (2018) First report of allergic contact dermatitis caused by sorbitan caprylate. Contact Dermatitis 78(2):162–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Goossens A et al (2008) New cosmetic allergens: isononyl isononanoate and trioleyl phosphate. Contact Dermatitis 59(5):320–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Higgins E, Collins P (2013) The relevance of 7-day patch test reading. Dermatitis 24(5):237–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Goossens A, Drieghe J (1998) Computer applications in contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 38(1):51–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Leeds Centre for DermatologyLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Chapel Allerton HospitalLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations