Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of Allergens in Complex Mixtures and Products

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Contact Dermatitis

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Identifying contact allergens among the myriad of chemicals used in commercial products is an extremely arduous task. This is even more difficult in the case of components of complex mixtures such as natural extracts and essential oils. Today, non-animal alternative methods validated to assess the sensitizing potential of chemicals are, overall, unable to completely predict the skin sensitization potential of these complex mixtures of chemicals. Moreover, toxicological profiles are very difficult to extrapolate from the mere sum of the profiles of the individual constituents as required today. In this context, hazard identification remains still one of the best solutions for risk assessment. This chapter presents a brief overview of methods allowing the identification of allergens in complicated chemical mixtures, going from bioassay-guided fractionation and combination with structure-activity relationships studies to more recent new techniques developed to trap and identify reactive intermediates in natural extracts during air oxidation. Practical applications are exposed such as the case of oak moss absolute. Also, the assessment of the sensitization potential of tea tree oil is a typical example of the challenges that toxicologists encounter in the safety evaluation of essential oils. Methods based on chemical reactivity and fluorescence trapping, basically studying the oil after aging and air oxidation, are discussed. Hence, a great deal of progress has been accomplished during the last years for the identification of chemicals culprit of the sensitizing potential of very complex chemical mixtures. That being said, the identification of allergens in complex mixtures and products is still a challenging puzzle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Fragrance Association. www.ifraorg.org

  2. de Groot AC, Schmidt E (2016) Contact allergy to essential oils: general aspects. In: Essential oils. Contact allergy and chemical composition. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products – 7th Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive. Off J Eur Union L66: 26–35

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Off J Eur Union L396: 1–849

    Google Scholar 

  5. OECD (2015) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: In: Chemico skin sensitization: direct peptide reactivity Assay (DPRA). OECD testing guidelines 442c. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229709-en

  6. OECD (2015) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: in vitro skin sensitization: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test method. OECD testing guidelines 442d. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229822-en

  7. OECD (2016) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). OECD testing guidelines 442e. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264359-en

  8. Api AM, Lalko J (2006) Investigation of the dermal sensitization potential of various essential oils in the local lymph node assay. Food Chem Toxicol 44:739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andres E, Sá-Rocha M, Barrichello C, Haupt T, Ellis G, Natsch A (2013) The sensitivity of the KeratinoSens™ assay to evaluate plant extracts: a pilot study. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1220–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013.02.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang M, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP (2017) Is it possible to assess the allergenicity of mixtures based on in chemico methods? Preliminary results on common fragrance aldehydes. Flavour Fragr J 32:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pieters L, Vlietinck AJ (2005) Bioguided isolation of pharmacologically active plant components, still a valuable strategy for the finding of new lead compounds? J Ethnopharmacol 100:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.05.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Houghton PJ, Raman A (1998) Laboratory handbook for the fractionation of natural extracts, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Mutterer V, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Menné T, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Rastogi SC, White IR (1999) Identification of coumarin as the sensitizer in a patient sensitive to her own perfume but negative to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 40:196–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06033.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Svedman C, Goossens A, White IR, Uter W, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Menné T, Johansen JD (2005) Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00565.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frosch PJ, Rastogi SC, Pirker C, Brinkmeier T, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Svedman C, Goossens A, White IR, Uter W, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Johansen JD, Menné T (2005) Patch testing with a new fragrance mix – reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 52:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00563.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dharmagunawardena B, Takwale A, Sanders KJ, Cannan S, Rodger A, Ilchyshyn A (2002) Gas chromatography: an investigative tool in multiple allergies to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis 47:288–292. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470506.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Groot AC, Weijland JW (1992) Systemic contact dermatitis from tea tree oil. Contact Dermatitis 27:279–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb03279.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lepoittevin JP (2011) Molecular aspects in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP (eds) Contact dermatitis, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kao D, Chaintreau A, Lepoittevin JP, Giménez-Arnau E (2014) Mechanistic studies on the reactivity of sensitizing allylic hydroperoxides: investigation of the covalent modification of amino acids by carbon-radical intermediates. Toxicol Res 3:278–289. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tx50109d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Uter W, Geier J, Frosch P, Schnuch A (2010) Contact allergy to fragrances: current patch test results (2005–2008) from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 63:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01759.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schulz H, Albroscheit G (1989) Characterization of oak moss products used in perfumery by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 466:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)84625-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thune P, Solberg Y, McFadden N, Staerfelt F, Sandberg M (1982) Perfume allergy due to oak moss and other lichens. Contact Dermatitis 8:396–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1982.tb04265.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Rastogi SC, Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Menné T, Goossens A, Andersen KE, Lepoittevin JP (2003) Contact allergy to oak moss: search for sensitizing molecules using combined bioassay-guided chemical fractionation, GC-MS, and structure-activity relationship analysis. Arch Dermatol Res 295:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-003-0426-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johansen JD, Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Bruze M, Andersen KE (2006) Comparison of elicitation potential of chloroatranol and atranol–2 allergens in oak moss absolute. Contact Dermatitis 54:192–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00814.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Svedman C, Bruze M, Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Rastogi SC, Lepoittevin JP, Menné T (2003) Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: a dose-response elicitation study. Contact Dermatitis 49:180–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0214.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rastogi SC, Bossi R, Johansen JD, Menné T, Bernard G, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP (2004) Content of oak moss allergens atranol and chloroatranol in perfumes and similar products. Contact Dermatitis 50:367–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00379.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. International Fragrance Association (2008) Code of practice 43rd amendment. Standard on oak moss extracts. www.ifraorg.org

  28. European Commission, Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (2004) Atranol and chloroatranol present in natural extracts (e.g. oak moss and tree moss extract). http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_006.pdf

  29. European Commission, Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (2008) Opinion on oak moss/tree moss (sensitisation only). http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_ risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_131.pdf

  30. Nardelli A, Giménez-Arnau E, Bernard G, Lepoittevin JP, Goossens A (2009) Is a low content in atranol/chloroatranol safe in oak moss-sensitized individuals? Contact Dermatitis 60:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01478.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mowitz M, Zimerson E, Svedman C, Bruze M (2013) Patch testing with serial dilutions and thin-layer chromatograms of oak moss absolutes containing high and low levels of atranol and chloroatranol. Contact Dermatitis 69:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Commission Regulation (EU) (2017) 2017/1410 of 2 August 2017 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and on the Council on cosmetic products. Off J Eur Union L202: 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chittiboyina AG, Avonto C, Rua D, Khan IA (2015) Alternative testing methods for skin sensitization: NMR spectroscopy for probing the reactivity and classification of potential skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 28:1704–1714. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Avonto C, Chittiboyina AG, Rua D, Khan IA (2015) A fluorescence high throughput screening method for the detection of reactive electrophiles as potential skin sensitizers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 289:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2015.09.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Groot AC, Schmidt E (2016) Tea tree oil. In: Essential oils. Contact allergy and chemical composition. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 809–824

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (2008) Opinion en tea tree oil, SCCP/1155/08

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aptula A, Patlewicz G, Roberts D (2005) Skin sensitization: reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure-activity relationships. Chem Res Toxicol 18:1420–1426. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx050075m

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Karlberg A-T, Bergstrom MA, Borje A, Luthman K, Nilsson JL (2008) Allergic contact dermatitis-formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 21:53–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx7002239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Avonto C, Chittiboyina AG, Wang M, Vasquez Y, Rua D, Khan IA (2016) In chemico evaluation of tea tree essential oils as skin sensitizers: impact of the chemical composition on aging and generation of reactive species. Chem Res Toxicol 29:1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mori HM, Iwahashi H (2013) Detection and identification of 1-methylethyl and methyl radicals generated by irradiating tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil with visible light (436 nm) in the presence of flavine mononucleotide and ferrous ion. Free Radic Res 47:657–663. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715762.2013.812785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Boche J, Runquist O (1968) Kinetics of the thermal rearrangement of ascaridole. J Org Chem 33:4285–4286. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01275a067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Christoffers WA, Blömeke B, Coenraads P-J, Schuttelar M-LA (2013) Co-sensitization to ascaridole and tea tree oil. Contact Dermatitis 69:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rudzki E, Rapiejko P, Rebandel P (2003) Occupational contact dermatitis, with asthma and rhinitis, from camomile in a cosmetician also with contact urticaria from both camomile and lime flowers. Contact Dermatitis 49:162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0185e.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Avonto C, Rua D, Lasonkar PB, Chittiboyina AG, Khan IA (2017) Identification of a compound isolated from German chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) with dermal sensitization potential. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 318:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2017.01.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hansen L, Hammershøy O, Boll PM (1986) Allergic contact dermatitis from falcarinol isolated from Schefflera arboricola. Contact Dermatitis 14:91–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01167.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Avonto C, Chittiboyina AG, Sadrieh N, Vukmanovic S, Khan IA (2018) In chemico skin sensitization risk assessment of botanical ingredients. J Appl Toxicol 38:1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dermatochemistry Laboratory, University of Strasbourg-Institut de Chimie, Institut le Bel, CNRS UMR 7177, Strasbourg, France

    Elena Giménez-Arnau

Authors
  1. Elena Giménez-Arnau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Giménez-Arnau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Amtssygehuset Gentofte Dept. Dermatology, Hellerup, Denmark

    Jeanne Duus Johansen

  2. Federal Institute for Vaccines & Biomed, Paul Ehrlich Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines & Biomed, Langen, Bayern, Germany

    Vera Mahler

  3. Institut le Bel Labo. Dermatochimie, Strasbourg CX, France

    Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin

  4. Hautklinik, Städtische Kliniken Dortmund Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany

    Peter J. Frosch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Giménez-Arnau, E. (2019). Identification of Allergens in Complex Mixtures and Products. In: Johansen, J., Mahler, V., Lepoittevin, JP., Frosch, P. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_5-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_5-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation