Life on Land

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Decision-Making Processes

  • Nataša LovrićEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_95-1

Synonyms

Definitions

A stakeholder is any entity with a declared or conceivable interest or stake in a policy concern. The range of stakeholders relevant to consider for analysis varies according to the complexity of the reform area targeted and the type of reform proposed and, where the stakeholders are not organized, the incentive to include them. Stakeholders can be of any form, size, and capacity. They can be individuals, organizations, or unorganized groups. In most cases, stakeholders fall into one or more of the following categories: international actors (e.g., donors); national or political actors (e.g., legislators, governors); public sector agencies (e.g., interest groups); (e.g., unions, medical associations); commercial/private for-profit, nonprofit organizations (NGOs, foundations); civil society members; and users/consumers (World Bank 2007).

A stakeholder can be defined as: Any individual, community, group or organisation with an interest in the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blair JD, Fottler MD (1990) Challenges in health care management: strategic perspectives for managing key stakeholders. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenner B (2001) Stakeholder management and ecosystem management: a stakeholder analysis of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. MBA thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  3. Briiner W, Hastings C, Geddes M (1996) Project leadership. Van Nostrnd Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown K et al (2001) Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecol Econ 37:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho KJ (2009) Developing an interpretive planning model for a national park system: a stakeholder-based needs assessment study for Korea. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University, Natural Resources. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1111776993
  6. Christie P (2004) Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in Southeast Asia. Am Fish Soc Symp 42:155–164Google Scholar
  7. Cleland DI (1999) Project management strategic design and implementation, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. De Lopez TT (2003) Economics and stakeholders of Ream National Park, Cambodia. Ecol Econ 46(2):269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Lopez TT et al (2001) Policy options for Cambodia’s Ream National Park: a stakeholder and economic analysis. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  10. Dentoni D, Bitzer V, Pascucci S (2016) J Bus Ethics 135:35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2728-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Development Co-operation Report (2012) Lessons in Linking sustainability and Development © OECD 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1787/dcr-2012-en
  12. DFID (2003) Tools for development – a handbook for those engaged in development activity. Performance and Effectiveness Department for International Development. March 2003. Tools for Development / Version 15.1 / March 2003Google Scholar
  13. DFID (2007) Stakeholder engagement: a good practice handbook for companies, doing business in emerging markets. IFC, World Bank. International Finance Corporation 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20433 U.S.A.Google Scholar
  14. Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1):65–91Google Scholar
  15. Eliot L (2001) Ask these questions to reach your stakeholders management. Glob Environ Chang 15:184–188Google Scholar
  16. Enserink E (2000) A quick scan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal 18(1):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission (2016c) European Commission – engaging stakeholders throughout the policy cycle. Internal document. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/EC-Stakeholder-Engagement.pdf
  18. European Commission (2016d) Planning and proposing a law. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law_en
  19. European Commission (2016e) Your voice in Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/consultations/index_en.htm
  20. Fletcher A et al (2003) Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. J Intellect Cap 4(4):505–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. J Manag Stud 29(2):131–154Google Scholar
  22. Frooman J (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gleason M et al (2010) Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean Coast Manag 53(2010):52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grimble R, Chan MK (1995) Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Nat Res Forum 19(3):113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grimble R, Wellard K (1997) Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric Syst 55(2):173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hübner A, Phong LT, Châu TSH, (2014) Good governance and tourism development in protected areas: the case of Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, central Vietnam. Koedoe 56(2):Art. #1146, 10 p.  https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v56i2.1146
  27. IIED (2005) Power tools, stakeholder power analysis. International Institute for Environmental Development. Russell Press, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. International Institute for Environment and Development, Power Tools: for policy influence in natural resource management. http://www.iied.org/natural-resources/key-issues/empowerment-and-land-rights/power-tools-for-policy-influence-natural-re(iied)
  29. Jennings SF, Lockie S (2002) Democratisation and capacity building in coastal zone decision-making in Australia: the application of stakeholder analysis and social mapping. Paper presented at the Coastal Zone Asia Pacific conference, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiran S (2009) Social network analysis of stakeholders in the context of forest related development interventions in NWFP, PhD thesis, 06-arid-1313Google Scholar
  31. Koonz TM (2005) We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Stud J 33(3), 459–481Google Scholar
  32. Lovrić N, Lovrić M, Konold W (2018) A grounded theory approach for deconstructing the role of participation in spatial planning: insights from Nature Park Medvednica, Croatia. Forest Policy Econ 87:20–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mushove P Vogel C (2005) Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management Global Environmental Change 15(3):184–198Google Scholar
  35. Nepal SK, Weber KE (1995) Prospects for coexistence: wildlife and local people. Ambio 24(4):238–245Google Scholar
  36. OECD (2015) Stakeholder engagement. In: Government at a glance 2015. OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-38-en
  37. OECD (2016) Pilot database on stakeholder engagement practices in regulatory policy. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/measuring-regulatory-performance.htm
  38. OECD website on regulatory policy in the European Commission. http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/european-commission.htm
  39. Pomeroy R, Douvere F (2008) The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar Policy 32:816–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22(6):501–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reed J et al (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag 90:1933–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Renard Y, Brown N, Geoghegan T (2001) Stakeholder approaches to natural resource management in the Caribbean. Regional conference on community-based coastal resource management, MéridaGoogle Scholar
  43. Rockloff SF, Lockie S (2004) Participatory tools for coastal zone management: use of stakeholder analysis and social mapping in Australia. J Coast Conserv 10:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Savage GT, Nix TW, Whitehead C, Blair J (1991) Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Acad Manag Exec 5(2):61–75Google Scholar
  45. Shepard G (2004) The ecosystem approach – five steps to implementation. IUCN Publications Services Unit, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK vi + 30 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Suman D, Shivlani M, ilon JW (1999) Perceptions and attitudes regarding marine reserves: a comparison of stakeholder groups in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Ocean Coast Manag 42(1999):1019–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Svendsen AC, Boutlier RG, Abbot R, Wheeler D (2004) Measuring the business value of stakeholder. Simon Fraser Centre for Innovation in Management, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner JR, Kristoffer V et al (eds) (2002) The project manager as change agent. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R (2000) A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plan 15(3):338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Bank (2007) Alternative dispute resolution site. http://go.worldbank.org/F1DHSHUEJ0

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Forest InstituteJoensuuFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Adriana Consorte McCrea

There are no affiliations available