Life on Land

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Soil Contamination and Remediation

  • Nuno M. C. Cruz
  • Sónia Morais RodriguesEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_68-1

Definitions

Soil contamination refers to the occurrence of a chemical or substance in soil above a certain concentration causing deterioration or loss of one or more soil functions (JRC 2014, 2016). Soil pollution is hereby defined as the human activity that causes soil contamination (JRC 2016). Soil remediation refers the management of the soil contaminant at a site so as to prevent, minimize, or mitigate hazard to human health, property, or the environment.

Introduction

Soil contamination is causing irreversible land losses worldwide and there are alarming global concerns about the sustainability of the soil resource. Soils are both source and a sink for pollution. Even after the removal of sources, soil contaminants may remain accumulated for many years, affecting soil functions, impairing soils’ ability to support life systems and soils’ capacity to provide ecosystem services, and often leading to the production of brownfields and derelict land (Rodrigues et al. 2009).

Hence, it is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abdel-Shafy H, Monsour MSM (2016) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt J Pet 25:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akcil A, Koldas S (2006) Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod 14:1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augusto L, Bakker MR, Meredieu C (2008) Wood ash applications to temperate forest ecosystems – potential benefits and drawbacks. Plant Soil 306:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand E, Peijnenburg W, Gronenberg B, Vink J, Lijzen J, Ten Hulscher D, Jonker C, Römkens PFAM, Roex E (2009) Towards implementation of bioavailability measurements in the Dutch regulatory framework. RIVM report 711701084Google Scholar
  5. Carlon C (ed) (2007) Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra. EUR 22805-ENGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen R, Sherbinin A, Ye C, Shi G (2014) China’s soil pollution: farms on the frontline. Science 344:691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruz NC, Rodrigues SM, Carvalho L, Duarte AC, Pereira E, Romkens PFAM, Tarelho LAC (2017) Ashes from fluidized bed combustion of residual forest biomass: recycling to soil as a viable management option. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(17):14770–14781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Oliveira JL, Campos EV, Bakshi M, Abhilash PC, Fraceto LF (2014) Application of nanotechnology for the encapsulation of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: prospects and promises. Biotechnol Adv 32:1550–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Rosa MC, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh R, Sultan Y (2010) Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nature Nanotechnol 5:91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demeyer A, Nkana JCV, Verloo MG (2001) Characteristics of wood ash and influence on soil properties and nutrient uptake: an overview. Bioresour Technol 77:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EA (Environment Agency) (2002) Contaminants in soil: collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans. R&D Publication CLR 9. Environment Agency, BristolGoogle Scholar
  12. EC (European Commission) (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions – thematic strategy for soil protection, COM(2006)231 final. Online on the internet: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/pdf/com_2006_0231_en.pdf
  13. EC (European Commission) (2011) Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste. COM/11/13. 19/1/2011. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  14. EC (European Commission) (2015) Closing the loop: commission adopts ambitious new circular economy package to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth. IP/15/6203. 2/12/2015. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. EEA (2014) Progress in management of contaminated sites. CSI 015, LSI 003. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management-of-contaminated-sites-3/assessment. Accessed 10 July 2018
  16. EPA South Australia (2016) Soil contamination. Overview fact sheet. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/12558_sc_overview_info.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018
  17. FAO (2018) In: Rodríguez-Eugenio, N, McLaughlin, M, Pennock, D (eds) Soil pollution: a hidden reality. FAO, Rome, 142 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Fillipelli GM, Risch M, Laidlaw MAS, Nichols DE, Crewe J (2015) Geochemical legacies and the future health of cities: A tale of two neurotoxins in urban soils. Elementa-Sci Anthrop. 3:59–77Google Scholar
  19. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huotari N, Tillman-Sutela E, Moilanen M, Laiho R (2015) Recycling of ash – for the good of the environment? For Ecol Manag 348:226–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jala S, Goyal D (2006) Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production – a review. Bioresour Technol 97:1136–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang Y, Lei M, Duan L, Longhurst P (2015) Integrating phytoremediation with biomass valorisation and critical element recovery: a UK contaminated land perspective. Biomass Bioenergy 83:328–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joint Research Centre – JRC (2014) Soil themes: soil contamination. http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/library/themes/contamination/. Accessed 10 July 2018
  24. Joint Research Centre – JRC (2016) In: Stolte J, Tesfai M, Øygarden L, Kværnø S, Keizer J, Verheijen F, Panagos P, Ballabio C, Hessel R (eds) Soil threats in Europe; EUR 27607 EN.  https://doi.org/10.2788/488054 (print);  https://doi.org/10.2788/828742 (online)
  25. Joint Research Centre – JRC (2017) In: Paya Perez A, Pelaez Sanchez S (eds) European achievements in soil remediation and brownfield redevelopment.  https://doi.org/10.2760/818120
  26. Kidd K, Mench M, lvarez-Lopez VA, Bert V, Dimitriou I, Friesl-Hanl W et al (2015) Agronomic practices for improving gentle remediation of trace element-contaminated soils. Int J Phytoremediation 17:1005–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Ma Z, van der Kuijp T, Yuan Z, Huang L (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468–469:843–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lombi E, Hamon RE (2005) Remediation of polluted soil. In: D. Hillel (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford. pp 379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu Y, Song S, Wang R, Liu Z, Meng J, Sweetman AJ, Jenkins A, Ferrier RC, Li H, Luo W, Wang T (2015) Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environ Int 77:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maresca A, Hyks J, Astrup TF (2017) Recirculation of biomass ashes onto forest soils: ash composition, mineralogy and leaching properties. Waste Manag 70:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mele E, Donner E, Juhasz AL, Brunetti G, Smith E, Betts AR, Castaldi P, Deiana S, Scheckel KG, Lombi E (2015) In situ fixation of metal(loid)s in contaminated soils: a comparison of conventional, opportunistic, and engineered soil amendments. Environ Sci Technol 49(22):13501–13509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mench M, Lepp N, Bert V, Schwitzguebel JP, Gawronski S, Schroder P et al (2010) Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: outcomes, assessment and outlook from COST action 859. J Soils Sediments 10:1039–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Modolo RC, Ferreira VM, Tarelho LA, Labrincha JA, Senff L, Silva L (2013) Mortar formulations with bottom ash from biomass combustion. Constr Build Mater 45:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Modolo RCE, Tarelho LAC, Teixeira ER, Ferreira VM, Labrincha JA (2014) Treatment and use of bottom bed waste in biomass fluidized bed combustors. Fuel Process Technol 125:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Modolo RCE, Silva T, Senff L, Tarelho LAC, Labrincha JA, Ferreira VM, Silva L (2015) Bottom ash from biomass combustion in BFB and its use in adhesive-mortars. Fuel Process Technol 129:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mueller ND, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490:254–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Panagos P, Van Liedekerke M, Yigini Y, Montanarella L (2013) Contaminated sites in Europe: review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network. J Environ Public Health 2013:158764. 11 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pesonen J, Kuokkanen V, Kuokkanen T, Illikainen M (2016) Co-granulation of bio-ash with sewage sludge and lime for fertilizer use. J Environ Chem Eng 4(4B):4817–4821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigues SM, Römkens PAFM (2018) Human health risks and soil pollution. In: Duarte AC, Cachada A, Rocha-Santos T (eds) Soil pollution: from monitoring to remediation. Elsevier Academic Press, London. pp 217–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodrigues SM, Pereira ME, Ferreira da Silva E, Hursthouse A, Duarte AC (2009) A review of regulatory decisions for environmental management: part I – challenges in the implementation of national soil policies. Environ Int 35:214–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrigues S, Henriques B, Reis A, Duarte A, Pereira E, Römkens PFAM (2012) Hg transfer from contaminated soils to plants and animals. Environ Chem Lett 10:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skousen J, Ziemkiewicz P, Yang JE (2012) Use of coal combustion by-products in mine reclamation: review of case studies in the USA. Geosy Eng 15(1):71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swartjes FA, Cornelis C (2011) Human health risk assessment. In: Swartjes FA (ed) Dealing with contaminated sites. Springer Science+Business Media B.V, Dordrecht. pp 209–259.Google Scholar
  44. Tarelho LAC, Neves DSF, Matos MAA (2011) Forest biomass waste combustion in a pilot-scale bubbling fluidised bed combustor. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1511–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tarelho LAC, Teixeira ER, Silva DFR, Modolo RCE, Labrincha JA, Rocha FJFT (2015) Characteristics of distinct ash flows in a biomass thermal power plant with bubbling fluidised bed combustor. Energy 90:387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tóth G, Hermann T, Szatmári G, Pásztor L (2016) Maps of heavy metals in the soils of the European Union and proposed priority areas for detailed assessment. Sci Total Environ 565:1054–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. U.S.EPA (2017) Superfund remedy report. 15th edition. EPA-542-R-17-001. Office of Land and Emergency ManagementGoogle Scholar
  48. Ukwattage NL, Ranjith PG, Bouazza M (2013) The use of coal combustion fly ash as a soil amendment in agricultural lands (with comments on its potential to improve food security and sequester carbon). Fuel 109:400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. UNESCO WWAP, World Water Assessment Program (2012) Facts and figures from the United Nations world water development report 4. Managing water under uncertainty and risk. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/WWAP_WWDR4%20Facts%20and%20Figures.pdf
  50. Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens A et al (2009) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 16:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wan X, Lei M, Chen T (2016) Cost–benefit calculation of phytoremediation technology for heavy metal contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 563–564:796–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang H, Huang X, Thompson JR, Flower RJ (2014) China’s soil pollution: urban brownfields. Science 344:691–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yao ZT, Ji XS, Sarker PK, Tang JH, Ge LO, Xia MS, Xi YO (2015) Comprehensive review on the application of coal fly ash. Earth Sci Rev 141:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CESAM & Department of ChemistryUniversidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Anabela Marisa Azul
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Neuroscience and Cell BiologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal