Life Below Water

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Tony Wall

Maritime Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71064-8_122-1
  • 39 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

Maritime spatial planning and marine spatial planning (in both cases, MSP) are the two most commonly used nomenclatures when referring to the process of analyzing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities in marine areas. MSP is a practical way to organize the use of the ocean space, minimizing conflicts and fostering compatibilities among human uses (e.g., fisheries, offshore aquaculture, renewable energy, tourism, or shipping) and between uses and the environment, and aiming to achieve ecological, economic, and social objectives (Ehler and Douvere 2009; Agardy 2010; Zaucha and Gee 2019).

MSP is a continuous and interactive process that must be regularly funded and adapted. Indeed, it includes several key phases and steps, linked through many feedback loops (Ehler and Douvere 2009): (1) identifying the need for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agardy T (2010) Ocean zoning: making marine management more effective. Earthscan, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateman IJ, Mace GM (2020) The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nature Sustainability 3(10):776–783.Google Scholar
  3. Claudet J, Bopp L, Cheung WW, Devillers R, Escobar-Briones E, Haugan P et al (2020) A roadmap for using the UN decade of ocean science for sustainable development in support of science, policy, and action. One Earth 2(1):34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD (2013) Quick guides to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/targets/compilation-quick-guide-en.pdf (Accessed: 2020)
  5. Douvere F (2008) The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar Policy 32(5):762–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehler C (2012) Perspective: 13 myths of marine spatial planning. Mar Ecosyst Manag 5(5):5–7Google Scholar
  7. Ehler C (2017) World-wide status and Trends of maritime/marine spatial planning. Presented at the 2nd international conference on marine/maritime spatial planning, UNESCO, Paris. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on marine/maritime spatial planning, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehler C, Douvere F (2007) Visions for a sea change: report of the first international workshop on marine spatial planning, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the Man and the Biosphere Programme UNESCO Headquarters, Paris. 8–10 Nov 2006Google Scholar
  9. Ehler C, Douvere F (2009) Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Program. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. European Union (2014) Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Off J Eur Union L 257:135–145Google Scholar
  11. Flannery W, McAteer B (2020) Assessing marine spatial planning governmentality. Maritime Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00174-2
  12. Flannery W, Healy N, Luna M (2018) Exclusion and non-participation in marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 88:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foley MM, Halpern BS, Micheli F, Armsby MH, Caldwell MR, Crain CM et al (2010) Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 34(5):955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frazão Santos C, Domingos T, Ferreira MA, Orbach M, Andrade F (2014) How sustainable is sustainable marine spatial planning? Part I – linking the concepts. Mar Policy 49:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frazão Santos C, Agardy T, Andrade F, Crowder LB, Ehler CN, Orbach MK (2018) Major challenges in developing marine spatial planning. Mar Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.032
  16. Frazão Santos C, Ehler CN, Agardy T, Andrade F, Orbach MK, Crowder LB (2019) Marine spatial planning. In: World seas: an environmental evaluation. Academic Press, London, pp 571–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frazão Santos C, Agardy T, Andrade F, Calado H, Crowder LB, Ehler CN et al (2020) Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nat Sustain 3:505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GEF (2012) Marine spatial planning in the context of the convention on biological diversity: A study carried out in response to CBD COP 10 decision X/29, CBD technical series No. 68, CBD Secretariat and the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel of the Global Environment Facility (GEF STAP), MontrealGoogle Scholar
  19. Gissi E, Fraschetti S, Micheli F (2019) Incorporating change in marine spatial planning: a review. Environ Sci Pol 92:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. González Pérez JA (2016) Sustainability of marine food resources–an ecological and fishery approach. J Environ Health Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.15436/2378-6841.16.1027
  21. Grimmel H, Calado H, Fonseca C, de Vivero JLS (2019) Integration of the social dimension into marine spatial planning–theoretical aspects and recommendations. Ocean Coast Manag 173:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassan D, Kuokkanen T, Soininen N (eds) (2015) Transboundary marine spatial planning and international law. Routledge, AbingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Inniss L, Simcock A, Ajawin AY, Alcala AC, Bernal P, Calumpong HP et al (2016) The first global integrated marine assessment. United Nations. Accessed 5 FebGoogle Scholar
  24. Janßen H, Bastardie F, Eero M, Hamon KG, Hinrichsen HH, Marchal P et al (2018) Integration of fisheries into marine spatial planning: quo vadis? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 201:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson AE, McClintock WJ, Burton O, Burton W, Estep A, Mengerink K et al (2020) Marine spatial planning in Barbuda: a social, ecological, geographic, and legal case study. Mar Policy 113:103793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones PJ, Lieberknecht LM, Qiu W (2016) Marine spatial planning in reality: introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Mar Policy 71:256–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jumeau R (2013) Small island developing states, large ocean states. In: Expert group meeting on oceans, seas and sustainable development: implementation and follow-up to Rio, vol 20, AprilGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasemir B, Jaeger CC, Jäger J (2003) Citizen participation in sustainability assessments. In: Public participation in sustainability science: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kyvelou SSI, Ierapetritis DG (2020) Fisheries sustainability through soft multi-use maritime spatial planning and local development co-management: potentials and challenges in Greece. Sustainability 12(5):2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norse EA, Crowder LB, Gjerde K, Hyrenbach D, Roberts CM et al (2005) Place-based ecosystem management in the open ocean. In: Norse EA, Crowder LB (eds) Marine conservation biology: the science of maintaining the sea’s diversity. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 302–327Google Scholar
  31. Ntona M, Morgera E (2018) Connecting SDG 14 with the other sustainable development goals through marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 93:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qiu W, Jones PJ (2013) The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe. Mar Policy 39:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quesada-Silva M, Iglesias-Campos A, Turra A, Suárez-de Vivero JL (2019) Stakeholder participation assessment framework (SPAF): a theory-based strategy to plan and evaluate marine spatial planning participatory processes. Mar Policy 108:103619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rilov G, Fraschetti S, Gissi E, Pipitone C, Badalamenti F, Tamburello L et al (2020) A fast-moving target: achieving marine conservation goals under shifting climate and policies. Ecol Appl 30(1):e02009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Russ GR, Zeller DC (2003) From mare liberum to mare reservarum. Mar Policy 27(1):75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryabinin V, Barbière J, Haugan P, Kullenberg G, Smith N, McLean C et al (2019) The UN decade of ocean science for sustainable development. Front Mar Sci 6:470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schupp MF, Bocci M, Depellegrin D, Kafas A, Kyriazi Z, Lukic I et al (2019) Towards a common understanding of ocean multi-use. Front Mar Sci 6:165.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Secretariat C (2018) Seychelles blue economy strategic policy framework and roadmap: charting the future (2018–2030)Google Scholar
  39. Silver JJ, Campbell LM (2018) Conservation, development and the blue frontier: the Republic of Seychelles’ debt restructuring for marine conservation and climate adaptation program. Int Soc Sci J 68(229–230):241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simpson S (2009) World changing ideas: marine zoning is a bold remedy for sick seas. Scientific American, December, pp 54–55Google Scholar
  41. Smith HD, Maes F, Stojanovic TA, Ballinger RC (2011) The integration of land and marine spatial planning. J Coast Conserv 15(2):291–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-010-0098-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soininen N, Hassan D (2015) Marine spatial planning as an instrument of sustainable ocean governance. In: Transboundary marine spatial planning and international law. Routledge, pp 19–36Google Scholar
  43. Trouillet B (2020) Reinventing marine spatial planning: a critical review of initiatives worldwide. J Environ Policy Plan:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1751605
  44. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, opened for signature Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 UNTS 397, reprinted in 21 ILM 1261 (1982) [hereinafter UNCLOS]. UNCLOS entered into force on 16 Nov 1994. Available at http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm
  45. UNEP (2014) Emerging issues for small island developing states. Results of the UNEP foresight process. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  46. UNESCO (2017). The 2nd international conference on marine/maritime spatial planning, 15–17 Mar 2017, UNESCO, Paris, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and European Commission (UNESCO, 2017)Google Scholar
  47. United Nations (2012) The future we want: outcome document of the United Nations conference on sustainable development. Rio de Janeiro, 20–22 June 2012Google Scholar
  48. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (UN, 2015)Google Scholar
  49. Vaughan D, Agardy T (2020) Marine protected areas and marine spatial planning–allocation of resource use and environmental protection. In: Marine protected areas. Elsevier, pp 13–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102698-4.00002-2
  50. Wright G, Gjerde KM, Johnson DE, Finkelstein A, Ferreira MA, Dunn DC et al (2019) Marine spatial planning in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Marine PolicyGoogle Scholar
  51. Zaucha J, Gee K (2019) Maritime spatial planning: past, present, future. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of the AzoresPonta DelgadaPortugal
  2. 2.Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaCascaisPortugal
  3. 3.Environmental Economics Knowledge CentreNova School of Business and EconomicsCarcavelosPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Anabela Marisa Azul
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC) & Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, University of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal