Responsible Consumption and Production

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Materiality: From Accounting to Sustainability and the SDGs

  • Donato CalaceEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71062-4_43-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Materiality is the concept that defines why and how certain matters or issues are of importance for a specific company or within a business sector. When an issue is material, it has major impacts on the financial, economic, reputational, and legal dimensions of a company, as well as on the system of internal and external stakeholders of that company.

What Is Materiality?

Introduction to Materiality

The concept of materiality applies to a wide variety of fields: accounting, auditing, reporting, business, financial, legal, risk management, and, more recently, nonfinancial issues (Corporate Reporting Dialogue 2017). This entry analyzes how materiality is defined across these domains with the purpose of providing a comprehensive picture of the concept and proposing a definition in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Before presenting how the entry is organized, it is thus important to highlight the role that materiality...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ACCA, KPMG, Fauna & Flora International (2014) Identifying natural capital risk and materialityGoogle Scholar
  2. AccountAbility (2008) AA1000 accountability principles standard 2008Google Scholar
  3. AccountAbility (2013) Redefining materiality II. Why it matters, who’s involved and what it means for corporate leaders and boards. AccountAbility, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker R, Eccles RG (2018) Should FASB and IASB be responsible for setting standards for nonfinancial information? Green Paper, University of Oxford Saïd Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakemore J, Pain B (1998) Materiality in accounting, ACCA Students Newsletter published by the Certified Accountant Education TrustGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan N, Gray S (2005) The impact of materiality: accounting’s best kept secret. Account Rev 49(2):342–352Google Scholar
  7. Burchell S, Clubb C, Hopwood AG, Hughes A (1997) The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Acc Organ Soc 5:5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calabrese A, Costa R, Rosati F (2015) A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Accounting Forum 39 (4):312–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter BW, Dirsmith MW (1992) Early debt extinguishment transactions and auditor materiality judgments: a bounded rationality perspective. Acc Organ Soc 17(8):709–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman CS, Cooper DJ, Miller P (2009) Accounting, organizations, and institutions: essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterji A, Levine D (2006) Breaking down the wall of codes: evaluating non-financial performance measurement. Calif Manag Rev 48(2):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Code of Federal Regulations: 1985–1999 (1988/1989) 17 CFR 210.1–02 – definitions of terms used in regulation S-X (17 CFR Part 210). US General Services Administration, National Archives and Records Service, Office of the Federal Register, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper SM, Owen DL (2007) Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: the missing link. Acc Organ Soc 32:649–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corporate Reporting Dialogue Consortium (2017) Statement of common principles of materialityGoogle Scholar
  15. Eccles RG, Krzus MP (2014) The integrated reporting movement: meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Eccles RG, Serafeim G (2013) The performance frontier. Harv Bus Rev 91(5):50–60Google Scholar
  17. Edgley C (2014) A genealogy of accounting materiality. Crit Perspect Account 25(3):255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edgley C, Jones MJ, Atkins J (2015) The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach. Br Account Rev 47(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Union (2014) Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the CouncilGoogle Scholar
  20. Financial Accounting Standard Board (1975) Criteria for determining materiality: FASB discussion memorandum and hearing. Ernst and Ernst, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Financial Accounting Standards Board (1980) Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 2. Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Affects: no other pronouncements, affected by: paragraph 4 and footnote 2 replaced by CON 6FASB, NorwalkGoogle Scholar
  22. Formisano V, Fedele M, Calabrese M (2018) The strategic priorities in the materiality matrix of the banking enterprise. TQM J 30:589–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S (2010) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2016) GRI 101: foundationGoogle Scholar
  25. Global Reporting Initiative GRI (2011) Sustainability reporting guidelines v3.1Google Scholar
  26. Global Reporting Initiative GRI (2013) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines: reporting principles and standard disclosuresGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall M, Millo Y, Barman E (2015) Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. J Manag Stud 52(7):907–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hicks EL (1964) Materiality. J Account Res 2(2):158–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmes W (1972) Materiality–through the looking glass. J Account 133(000002):44Google Scholar
  30. IASB (1989) Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements. International Accounting Standards Committee, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. IFAC (1998) Practice statement 1010, IFAC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (1967) Accounting recommendation, 2.301Google Scholar
  33. International Federation of Accountants (2010) International standard on auditing 320 “Materiality in planning and performing an audit”Google Scholar
  34. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2013) Consultation Draft of the International FrameworkGoogle Scholar
  35. International Integrated Reporting Council, and International Federation of Accountants (2015) Materiality in <IR> guidance for the preparation of integrated reportsGoogle Scholar
  36. International Standardization Organization, and Global Reporting Initiative (2014) GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000:2010 How to use the GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunctionGoogle Scholar
  37. Iskandar TM, Iselin ER (1999) A review of materiality research. Account Forum 23(3):209–239. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jensen M (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J Appl Corp Financ 14(3):8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D (2015a) Materiality and external assurance in corporate sustainability reporting. Prop Manag 33(5):430–450Google Scholar
  40. Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D (2015b) Materiality in corporate sustainability reporting within UK retailing. N Engl J Public Policy 16(1):81–90Google Scholar
  41. Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate sustainability: first evidence on materiality. Account Rev 91(6):1697–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kohler EL (1970) Dictionary for accountants. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  43. Kylsant R v (1932) Rex v. Kylsant. A new golden rule for prospectuses. Harvard Law Rev 45(6):1078–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marti E, Gond J-P (2017) When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity. Acad Manag Rev, pp 487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller P, Power M (2013) Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory. Acad Manag Ann 7:557–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nandy M, Lodh S (2012) Do banks value the eco-friendliness of firms in their corporate lending decision? Some empirical evidence. Int Rev Financ Anal 25:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newman B, Mellman M (1967) Accounting theory: a CPA review. Wiley, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Dwyer B (2011) The case of sustainability assurance: constructing a new assurance service. Contemp Account Res 28(4):1230–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ortar L (2018) Materiality matrixes in sustainability reporting: an empirical examination. SSRN Electron J, pp 33–66Google Scholar
  50. Perego P, Kolk A (2012) Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: the evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. J Bus Ethics 110:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Puroila J, Kujala J, Mäkelä H (2016) Reframing materiality in sustainability reporting. In: Academy of management proceedings, vol 2016, no 1. Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, p 12697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Searcy C (2009) Corporate sustainability performance measurement: lessons from system of systems engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cyberneticsGoogle Scholar
  53. Solomon JF, Rhianon Pel Edgley C (2008) The abandoned mandatory OFR: a lost opportunity for SER? Soc Responsib J 4(3):324–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (2017) SASB’s approach to materiality for the purpose of standards developmentGoogle Scholar
  55. U.S. Supreme Court (1976), TSC Indus. v. Northway, Inc, 426 US. 438, 449Google Scholar
  56. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable developmentGoogle Scholar
  57. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2018) Enhancing the comparability of sustainability reporting: selection of core indicators for entity reporting on the contribution towards the attainment of the sustainable development goalsGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitehead J (2016) Prioritizing sustainability indicators: using materiality analysis to guide sustainability assessment and strategy. Bus Strateg Environ 26(3):399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams CA, Fisch JE (2018) Petition to SEC or rulemaking on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosureGoogle Scholar
  60. World Business Council for Sustainable Development WBCSD, and Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission COSO (2018) Enterprise risk management applying enterprise risk management to environmental, social, and governance-related risksGoogle Scholar
  61. World Business Council for Sustainable Development WBCSD, and United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (2010) Translating ESG into sustainable business valueGoogle Scholar
  62. World Federation of Exchanges (2018) WFE ESG guidance and metricsGoogle Scholar
  63. Zadek S, Merme M (2003) Redefining materiality. AccountAbility, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Zadek S, Evans R, Pruzan P (2013) Building corporate accountability: emerging practice in social and ethical accounting and auditing. Earthscan, AbingdonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Director of Innovation, DatamaranLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Luciana Brandli
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Passo FundoPasso FundoBrazil