Responsible Consumption and Production

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Cheap Search: A New Methodology for Technological Innovations

  • Carlos Victor Bragatto PratesEmail author
  • Matheus Cardoso Esposito Rafael
  • Hemani Alves Fúrfuro de Souza
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71062-4_104-1

Definition

Scientific capacity and technological innovations are already part of the present, and the understanding of their causes and their consequences becomes extremely important for an active and conscious participation in this process. Where bright discoveries are daily and in large numbers, it can be said that the present moment represents the knee of this exponential growth and that this intensity brings with it positive and negative points. The Cheap Search is a response to the market, which, motivated by the intensity of production, makes the context of projects increasingly expensive and unfeasible for common use. Through several alternative methodologies, amateur and professional researchers can develop projects, make Cheap Search as a consequence, but often create better methods than existing ones. The expansion of this network works and methods makes research movement more fluid, independent, and democratic.

Introduction

This article has a main objective to analyze and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Archibugi D, Planta M (1996) Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, Elsevier 16(9):451–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunge M, Tristan M (1969) La investigación científica, su estrategia y su filosofía. barcelona. ArielGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassiolato JE (1996) As novas políticas de competitividade: a experiência dos principais países da ocde. Texto para discussão:367Google Scholar
  4. Coombs JE, III PEB (2006) Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Manag, Wiley Online Library 36(4):421–438Google Scholar
  5. Cupani A (2004) A tecnologia como problema filosófico: três enfoquesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davenport TH, Prusak L et al (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, [S.l.]Google Scholar
  7. Dogson M, Gann DM, Phillips N (2014) Perspectivas na gestão da inovação. O manual Oxford de gestão da inovação 91:3–25Google Scholar
  8. Gershenfeld N (2012) How to make almost anything: The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Aff, HeinOnline 91:43Google Scholar
  9. Habermas J (1984) Mudançaa estrutural da esfera pública: investigações quanto a uma categoria da sociedade burguesa, vol 357. Tempo Brasileiro Rio de Janeiro, [S.l.]Google Scholar
  10. Kobiyama M, Manfroi O (1999) Importância da modelagem e monitoramento em bacias hidrográficas. In: Curso de Extensão: Manejo de bacias hidrográficas sob a perspectiva florestal. Curitiba: Curso de Eng. Florestal–UFPR, pp 111–118Google Scholar
  11. Ladriere J (1979) Os desafios da racionalidade. [S.l.: s.n]. 84 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Lastres HM, Albagli S et al (1999) Informação e globalização na era do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Campus:163Google Scholar
  13. Maliska C (2004) Transferência de calor e mecânica dos fluidos computacional. Edição. Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos Editora 200Google Scholar
  14. Manual O (1992) OECD proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. [S.l.]. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Maravilhas S, Martins J (2019) Strategic knowledge management a digital environment: tacit and explicit knowledge in fab labs. J Bus Res, Elsevier 94:353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcondes V (2007) Novas tecnologias de conexão e o futuro da esfera pública. Trabalho apresentado no Intercom Sul. CDROM, Passo FundoGoogle Scholar
  17. Ortega J et al (1965) Meditación de la técnica: Vicisitudes en las ciencias. Bronca en la física. Prólogos a la“Biblioteca de ideas del siglo XX”, vol 1360. Espasa-Calpe, [S.l.]Google Scholar
  18. Palacios M (2006) A internet como mídia e ambiente. reflexões a partir de um experimento de rede local de participação. Maia, R., Castro, MCPS (org.) Mídia, esfera pública e identidades coletivas, pp 229–244Google Scholar
  19. Resnick M, Ocko S et al (1990) LEGO/logo–learning through and about design. [S.l.]. Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Sipitakiat A, Blikstein P, Cavallo DP (2004) Gogo board: augmenting programmable bricks for economically challenged audiences. In: International society of the learning sciences. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on learning sciences. [S.l.], pp 481–488Google Scholar
  21. Tigre PB (1998) Inovação e teorias da firma em três paradigmas. Revista de economia contemporânea 1:2Google Scholar
  22. Troxler P (2013) Making the 3rd industrial revolution. In: FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. Transcript Publishers, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamamoto JK, Landim PMB (2015) Geoestatística: conceitos e aplicações. Oficina de textos, [S.l.]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Victor Bragatto Prates
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matheus Cardoso Esposito Rafael
    • 2
  • Hemani Alves Fúrfuro de Souza
    • 3
  1. 1.VitóriaBrazil
  2. 2.João MonlevadeBrazil
  3. 3.ViçosaBrazil

Section editors and affiliations

  • Medani P Bhandari
    • 1
  1. 1.SustainabilityAkamai University, Hilo, Hawaii, USAHiloUSA