Synonyms
Definitions
Urban ecological footprint is an area-based measure designed to account for the burden a given metropolis’ lifestyle has on the biosphere. It identifies, using a common measurement unit called global hectare, the amount of land area and aquatic resources required with the prevailing technology to continuously sustain a given population. This result includes the energy and material inputs needed to afford its demands and to process or dispose of wastes.
Introduction
From its conception in the 1990s, the ecological footprint has been an important research field that resides in the evaluation of urban settlements to bring insights into urban sustainability. Its major strength is the direct measure of the natural capital (resources and ecological services) required to fulfill the consumption and processing rates of a given population and its relationship with economic development. The integration of this information...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baabou W, Grunewald N, Ouellet-Plamondon C et al (2017) The ecological footprint of Mediterranean cities: awareness creation and policy implications. Environ Sci Pol 69:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.013
Bond S (2002) Ecological footprints. A guide for local authorities. WWF-UK, Surrey
Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G et al (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.005
Calcott A, Bull J (2008) Ecological footprint of British city residents. In: WWF. http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/city_footprint2.pdf Accessed 20 Jul 2018
Céspedes J, Morales-Pinzón T (2018) Urban metabolism and sustainability: precedents, genesis and research perspectives. Resour Conserv Recycl 131:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.023
Costanza R (2000) The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 32:341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00150-0
Daly HE (1990) Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R
Ewing B, Goldfinger S, Wackernagel M et al (2008) The ecological footprint atlas 2008. Global Footprint Network, Oakland
Ewing BR, Hawkins TR, Wiedmann TO et al (2012) Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework. Ecol Indic 23:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.025
Fang K, Heijungs R, de Snoo GR (2014) Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Indic 36:508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.08.017
FAO (2017) FAOSTAT. In: Food Agric Organ United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Accessed 4 Jun 2018
FAO; GAEZ (2018) GAEZ – Global Agro-Ecological Zones. In: Food Agric Organ United Nations. International Institutes of Applied Systems Analysis. http://www.fao.org/nr/gaez/en/. Accessed 4 Jun 2018
Fiala N (2008) Measuring sustainability: why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecol Econ 67:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.023
Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19:863–876
Galli A, Giampietro M, Goldfinger S et al (2016) Questioning the ecological footprint. Ecol Indic 69:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.014
Haberl H, Wackernagel M, Krausmann F et al (2004) Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: a comparison. Land Use Policy 21:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.008
Hoekstra AY (ed) (2003) Virtual water trade. In: Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. IHE, Delft, 242p
Holden E (2004) Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form. J Housing Built Environ 19:91–109
Høyer KG, Holden E (2003) Household consumption and ecological footprints in Norway – does urban form matter? J Consum Policy 26:327–349
Kissinger M, Haim A (2008) Urban hinterlands – the case of an Israeli town ecological footprint. Environ Dev Sustain 10:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9071-2
Kissinger M, Rees WE (2009) Footprints on the prairies: Degradation and sustainability of Canadian agricultural land in a globalizing world. Ecological Economics 68(8–9):2309–2315
Kool R (2013) Limits to growth, environmental science and the nature of modern prophecy. Ecol Econ 85:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.013
Korotayev A (2006) The World System urbanization dynamics. In: Turchin P, Grinin L, Korotayev A, de Munck V (eds) History & mathematics: historical dynamics and development of complex societies. KomKniga, Moscow, pp 44–62
Lu Y, Chen B (2017) Urban ecological footprint prediction based on the Markov chain. J Clean Prod 163:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.034
Luck MA, Jenerette GD, Wu J, Grimm NB (2001) The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems 4:782–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0046-8
Mancini MS, Galli A, Coscieme L et al (2018) Exploring ecosystem services assessment through Ecological Footprint accounting. Ecosyst Serv 30:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.010
Meyer A (2000). Contraction & convergence: the global solution to climate change. Green Books, Cambridge.
Moffatt I (2000) Ecological footprints and sustainable development. Ecol Econ 32:359–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00154-8
Moore D, Cranston G, Reed A, Galli A (2012) Projecting future human demand on the Earth’s regenerative capacity. Ecol Indic 16:3–10
Neelmani J, Sudeshna S (2014) Urbanization in India: an impact assessment. Int J Appl Sociol 4:60–65. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijas.20140402.04
NFA (2018) National footprint accounts data set (1961–2014). In: Global footprint network – advancing the science of sustainability. https://data.world/footprint/nfa-2018-edition. Accessed 25 Oct 2019
Nijkamp P, Rossi E, Vindigni G (2004) Ecological Footprints in plural: a meta-analytic comparison of empirical results. Reg Stud 38:747–765
Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4:121–130
Rees WE (1997) Is “sustainable city” an oxymoron? Local Environ 2:303–310
Rees W (2003) 1 – Ecological footprints and urban transportation. In: Tolley R (ed) Sustainable transport: Planning for walking and cycling in urban environments, 3–19. CRC Press/Woodhead: Boca Raton/Cambridge
Rees WE (2006) Ecological Footprints and Biocapacity: Essential Elements in Sustainability Assessment. In: Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H (eds) Renewables-based Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp. 143–157
Rees WE, Rees WE (1995) Achieving sustainability: reform or transformation? J Plan Lit 9:343–361
Roth E, Rosenthal H, Burbridge P (2000) A discussion of the use of the sustainability index: “Ecological footprint” for aquaculture production. Aquat Living Resour 13:461–469
Sun J, Liu C, Luo B (2009) In: Li D, Zhao C (eds) Calculation of resources carrying capacitybased on ecological footprint in Beijing mountainous area BT – computer and computing technologies in agriculture II, vol 1. Springer, Boston, pp 593–602
Toledo VM (2013) El metabolismo social: una nueva teoría socioecológica. Relac Estud Hist y Soc XXXIV:41–71
Toth G, Szigeti C (2016) The historical ecological footprint: from over-population to over-consumption. Ecol Indic 60:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.040
UNESCAPE (2013) Urbanization trends in Asia and the Pacific. In: United nations economic and social commission for Asia and the Pacific. http://www.unescapsdd.org/files/documents/SPPS-Factsheet-urbanization-v5.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2018
van den Bergh JCJM, Verbruggen H (1999) Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ 29:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00032-4
Varshney A (1993) Beyond urban bias. Frank Cass, London
Wackernagel M (2006) Ecological footprint accounting. In: Keiner M (ed) Comparing Earth’s biological capacity with an economy’s resource demand BT – the future of sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 193–209
Wackernagel M, Monfreda C (2004) Ecological footprints and energy. In: Cleveland CJBT-E of E. Elsevier, New York, pp 1–11
Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. no. 9:125
Wackernagel M, Silverstein J (2000) Big things first: focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ 32:391–394
Wackernagel M, Schulz NB, Deumling D et al (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9266–9271. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142033699
Wiedmann T, Minx J, Barrett J, Wackernagel M (2006) Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis. Ecol Econ 56:28–48
WWF (2016) Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era, Gland
Yue D, Guo J, Hui C (2013) Scale dependency of biocapacity and the fallacy of unsustainable development. J Environ Manag 126:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ortega-Montoya, C.Y., Johari, A. (2019). Urban Ecological Footprints. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Sustainable Cities and Communities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_76-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_76-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71061-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71061-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences