Sustainable Cities and Communities

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Implementation of Green Infrastructure in Post-disaster Recovery

  • Ai TashiroEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_110-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Green infrastructure (GI) is a term that is evolving in meaning (Austin 2014). In general, GI can be defined as an interconnected green space network that incorporates natural areas and open spaces to provide multiple benefits for people and wildlife (e.g. regional parks, nature preserves, river corridors, greenways, and wetlands) (Benedict and McMahon 2006). GI has its origin in two fundamental initiatives: (1) protecting and linking parks and other green spaces for the benefit of people (recreation, health, aesthetics, and urban design) and (2) preserving and linking natural areas to benefit biodiversity and counter habitat fragmentation (protecting native plants, animals, natural processes, and ecosystems) (Benedict and McMahon 2006). In the EU, GI is defined as a “strategically planned network of high quality natural and semi-natural areas with other...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Planning Association (2014) Planning for post-disaster recovery briefing papers green infrastructure and post-disaster recovery. https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9139479/
  2. Austin G (2014) Green infrastructure for landscape planning: integrating human and natural systems. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2006) Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Braat LC, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1:4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrd C et al (2017) Understanding and promoting the values of urban green infrastructure: a learning module. GREEN SURGE project Deliverable 4.5, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, p 38Google Scholar
  6. Byrne JA, Lo AY, Jianjun Y (2015) Landscape and urban planning residents understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan 138:132–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabinet Office Government of Japan (2015) Disaster management in Japan. Minister of State for Disaster Management, Japan and UNISDR, pp 1–48. http://www.bousai.go.jp/kaigirep/hakusho/pdf/WPDM2015_Summary.pdf
  8. Derkzen ML, van Teeffelen AJA, Verburg PH (2017) Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: how do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? Landsc Urban Plan 157:106–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elbakidze M et al (2017) A bottom-up approach to map land covers as potential green infrastructure hubs for human well-being in rural settings: a case study from Sweden. Landsc Urban Plan 168:72–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elmqvist T, Alfsen C, Colding J (2008) Urban systems. In S. E. Jorgensen (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Ecology (pp. 3665–3672). Oxford, UK: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EPA HP. Green infrastructure and surface water impacts. https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/green-infrastructure-and-surface-water-impacts. Accessed 5 Sept 2019
  12. European Commission (2013a) Technical information on green infrastructure (GI). Commission staff working document. Accompanying the document. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. COM 249 final. EC, Brussels, Belgium [online]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0155&from=EN
  13. European Commission (2013b) Building a green infrastructure for Europe. ISBN: 978-92-79-33428-3Google Scholar
  14. Gill S, Handley JF, Ennos R, Pauleit S (2007) Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ 33:115–133.  https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.33.1.115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green Infrastructure Association (2017) Nikkei BP marketing, Tokyo. ISBN: 9784822235222Google Scholar
  16. Japan Lutheran Emergency Relief (2014) 2011.3.11 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami report. http://www.jelc.or.jp/jler/02JLER20140403.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2019
  17. Karen A, Foley C, Smardon R (2015) Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY. Landsc Urban Plan 136:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura S (2016) When a seawall is visible: infrastructure and obstruction in post-tsunami reconstruction in Japan. Sci Cult 25(1):23–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1081501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lienert J, Schnetzer F, Ingold K (2013) Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. J Environ Manag 125:134–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meerow S, Newell JP (2017) Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: growing resilience in Detroit. Landsc Urban Plan 159:62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mell I (2016) Global Green Infrastructure: Lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management. New York, NY: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of the Environment (2019) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in Japan a handbook for practitioners. http://www.env.go.jp/nature/biodic/eco-drr/pamph04.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2019
  23. Natural England (2009) Natural England’s green infrastructure guidance (NE176). http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/35033. Accessed 5 Sept 2019
  24. New York City (2013) A stronger, more resilient New York. http://www.nyc.gov/html/sirr/html/report/report.shtml. Accessed 5 Sept 2019
  25. Nishida T, Iwasa Y (2015) Toward development of Japan’s green infrastructure: ecosystem-based solution for disaster risk reduction, infrastructure development, and national land management. Q J Public Policy Manage 1:46–55Google Scholar
  26. Onuma A, Tsuge T (2018) Comparing green infrastructure as ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction with gray infrastructure in terms of costs and benefits under uncertainty: a theoretical approach. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 32:22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Philadelphia City (2009) Philadelphia combined sewer overflow long term control plan update, sup. vol 2: triple bottom line analysis. http://www.phillywa- tersheds.org/ltcpu/Vol02_TBL.pdf
  28. Portland HP. What is green infrastructure? https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/47203. Accessed 5 Sept 2019
  29. Renaud FG et al (2016) Developments and opportunities for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Adv Nat Technol Hazards Res 42:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rizvi AR, Baig S, Verdone M (2015) Ecosystem based adaptation: knowledge gaps in making an economic case for investing in nature based solutions for climate change. IUCN, Gland.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.938604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rouse DC, Bunster-Ossa I (2018) Green infrastructure: a landscape approach. In: Planning for climate change: a reader in green infrastructure and sustainable design for resilient cities. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Shackleton CM et al (2016) How important is green infrastructure in small and medium-sized towns? Lessons from South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan 180:273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Springer J (2009) Addressing the social impacts of conservation: lessons from experience and future directions. Conserv Soc 7(1):26.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.54794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tashiro A, Sakisaka K (2015) Model analysis of residents’ consciousness regarding seawall construction: case study of Kesennuma City in Miyagi prefecture. Stud Reg Sci 45(4):419–433.  https://doi.org/10.2457/srs.45.419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turner V, Jarden K (2016) Resident perspectives on green infrastructure in an experimental suburban stormwater management program. Cities Environ 9(1):4. http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol9/iss1/4/. Accessed 5 Sept 2019Google Scholar
  36. Van Heerden IL (2007) The failure of the New Orleans levee system following Hurricane Katrina and the pathway forward. Public Adm Rev 67:24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00810.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vergnes A, Viol IL, Clergeau P (2012) Green corridors in urban landscapes affect the arthropod communities of domestic gardens. Biol Conserv 145:171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. World Disaster Report (2014) World Disasters Report 2014: focus on culture and risk. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00327.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamamoto H, Chiba H (2014) Community initiative for the reconstruction of autonomous Kominkan in the tsunami affected area: a case of Maehama Marine Center in Kesennuma City, Miyagi Prefecture. Bull Jpn Soc Study Kominkan 11:16–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Section editors and affiliations

  • Astrid Skjerven
    • 1
  1. 1.OsloMet -Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway