Reduced Inequalities

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Urban Metabolism as Driver for Inequalities: Case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • Andreas Meyer
  • Petra SchneiderEmail author
  • Anh Le Hung
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_29-1

Definition

Cities are constantly undergoing a transformation, they are growing, old buildings are being replaced by new ones, new districts are being built on the outskirts, supply lines are being extended, and much more. Urban metabolism describes all technical and socioeconomic processes and transformations within a city, beginning with created objects during a growth phase, through energy production and use, up to waste generation, recycling and disposal (Kennedy et al. 2007). The urban metabolism approach is further a model for the description as well as the analysis material and energy flows within city (Pincetl et al. 2012). In a broader sense, the concept of urban metabolism can be compared with a living organism that absorbs substances, converts them, and releases subsidiary products back into the environment (Timmeren 2014). According to nowadays definition, urban metabolism is a “collection of complex socio-technical and socio-ecological processes by which flows of material,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atlas of Urban Expansion (2016) Ho Chi Minh City, available online: http://www.atlasofurbanexpansion.org/cities/view/Ho_Chi_Minh_City, Accessed 22 Jul 2019
  2. Aristotle (1984). In: Barnes J (ed) The complete works of Aristotle, the revised Oxford translation, volume two. Book VII, pp 2014–2015, 1326a5 and 1326a35. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, United States, Sixth Printing, 1995Google Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2014) Urban metabolism of six Asian cities. Mandaluyong City. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/59693/urban-metabolism-six-asian-cities.pdf
  4. Bai X (2016) Eight energy and material flow characteristics of urban ecosystems. Ambio 45(7):819–830.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0785-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buitelaar E, Raspe O, Weterings A (2016) Urban inequality and justice. Creating conceptual order and providing a policy menu. PBL working paper 22. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  6. Catalano MT, Leise TL, Pfaff TJ (2009) Measuring resource inequality: the Gini coefficient. Numeracy 2(2):Article 4.  https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.2.2.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Chen B (2015) Sustainable urban metabolism. In: Encyclopaedia of environmental management. Taylor & Francis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275966566_Sustainable_Urban_Metabolism
  8. Currie PK, Musango JK (2016) African urbanization: assimilation urban metabolism into sustainability discourse and practice. J Ind Ecol 21:1262–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Luca TS (2018) Political equality as fundamental to human rights within and between borders. International Political Science Association Biennial Congress, Brisbane, July 21–25, 2018. https://www.ipsa.org/sites/default/files/ipsa-events/wc2018/papers/paper-105647-2018-07-17t222001-0400.pdf
  10. Dodman D, Dalal-Clayton B, McGranahan G (2013) Integrating the environment in urban planning and management. Key principles and approaches for cities in the 21st century. United Nations Environment Program. http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/publications/integrating_the_environment.pdf
  11. Dubrow JK (2015) Political inequality in an age of democracy. Cross-national perspectives. Routledge, New York. ISBN: 978-0415858601Google Scholar
  12. Duvigneaud P, Denayeyer-De Smet S (1977) L’Ecosystéme Urbs. In: Duvigneaud P, Kestemont P (eds) L’Ecosystéme Urbain Bruxellois, in Productivité en Belgique. Travaux de la Section Belge du Programme Biologique International, Bruxelles, pp 581–597Google Scholar
  13. Erman E, Näsström S (2013) In search of political equality. In: Erman E, Näsström S (eds) Political equality in transnational democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137372246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2013) Building a green infrastructure for Europe.  https://doi.org/10.2779/54125
  15. European Commission (2018) Indicators for sustainable cities. Science for environment policy, in-depth report 12. Bristol. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/indicators_for_sustainable_cities_IR12_en.pdf
  16. Feenan R, Kelly J, McAuley M (2018) JLL City Momentum Index 2018. Jones Lange Lasalle IP, Inc., pp 8–9. http://www.jll.com/research/203/jll-city-momentum-index-2018
  17. Florida R, Mellander C (2015) Segregated city. The geography of economic segregation in America’s metros. Martin Prosperity Institute, University of Toronto. http://martinprosperity.org/media/Segregated%20City.pdf
  18. General Statistics Office of Vietnam GSO (2017) Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2017, available online: https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=18941, Accessed 22 Jul 2019
  19. Gini C (1909) Concentration and dependency ratios (in Italian). English translation in Riv Polit Econ 87(1997):769–789Google Scholar
  20. Glaeser EL, Resseger M, Tobio K (2008) Urban inequality. Working paper 14419. National Bureau of Economic Research, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA, p 2. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant U (2010) patial inequality and urban poverty traps. ODI working paper 326. Overseas Development Institute, London. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/5502.pdfGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanya T, Ambe Y (1975) A study on the metabolism of cities. In: Science for better environment. Proceedings of the international congress on the human environment (HESC). Pergaman Press, pp 228–233, 1977Google Scholar
  23. Hartley L, Toan LQ (2008) Mapping urban poverty in Ho Chi Minh City, Habitat for Humanity, Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, available online: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-vi/attachments/20090702/c600947a/attachment.pdf, Accessed 22 Jul 2019
  24. Ho Chi Minh City Statistical Office (HCMC-SO) (2016) Ho Chi Minh City statistical yearbook 2016, available online: http://www.pso.hochiminhcity.gov.vn/web/guest/niengiamthongke, Accessed 22 Jul 2019
  25. Kennedy C, Cuddihy J, Engel-Yan J (2007) The changing metabolism of cities. J Ind Ecol 11:43–59.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy C, Pincetl S, Bunje P (2011) The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning design. Environ Pollut 159:1965–1973.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022. Elsevier LtdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kennedy CA, Stewart I, Facchini A, Cersosimo I et al (2015) Energy and material flows of megacities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504315112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kipper R, Fischer M (eds) (2009) Cairo’s informal areas between urban challenges and hidden potentials. Facts voices visions. German Technical Cooperation, Cario. http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/CA_Docs/resources/Cairo%27s%20Informal%20Areas%20Between%20Urban%20Challenges%20and%20Hidden%20Potentials/CairosInformalAreas_fulltext.pdfGoogle Scholar
  29. Kourtit K, Nijkamp P (2013) In praise of megacities in a global world. Reg Sci Policy Pract 5(2):167–183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Eisenmenger N, Erb K-H, Haberl H, Fischer-Kowalski M (2009) Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecol Econ 68(10):2696–2705. http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/socec/downloads/Online_data_global_flows_update_2011.xlsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kriken JL, Enquist P, Rapaport R (2010) City building. Nine planning principles for the twenty-first century. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Margolin V (2015) The good city: design for sustainability. She Ji: J Des Econ Innov 1(1):34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle. Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press, New York. http://www.mcdonough.com/writings/cradle-cradle-remaking-way-make-things/Google Scholar
  34. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York. http://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scan-version.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Minx JC, Creutzig F, Medinger V, Ziegler T, Owen A, Baiocchi G (2011) Developing a pragmatic approach to assess urban metabolism in Europe – a report to the Environment Agency prepared by Technische Universität Berlin and Stockholm Environment Institute. Climatecon working paper 01/2011. Technische Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Nguyen TB, Samsura DAA, van der Krabben E, Le A-D (2016) Saigon – Ho Chi Minh City. Cities 50:16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olmsted JC, Olmsted FL (1903) Report of the Park Board. Brookline. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=93613
  38. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015) Kurzdossier zum informellen Unternehmertum. Unternehmertätigkeiten in Europa. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=13791&langId=de
  39. Oxfam Briefing Paper (2017) Even it up – how to tackle inequality in Vietnam. ISBN: 978-604-65-2828-9Google Scholar
  40. Pincetl S, Bunje P, Holmes T (2012) An expanded urban metabolism method: toward a systems approach for assessing urban energy processes and causes. Landscape Urban Plan 193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plato (360 B.C.E, translated by B. Jowett). The Republic. Book IV. p 278. http://www.idph.net/conteudos/ebooks/republic.pdf
  42. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. 24 September 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sasaki (2012) Thu Thiem, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. 1:2000 Master plan adjustment, 2012. https://issuu.com/haleyheard/docs/tt_final_report
  44. Schandl H, Fischer-Kowalski M, West J, Gilium S, Dittrich M, Eisenmenger N, Geschke A, Lieber M, Wieland H, Schaffartzik A, Krausmann F, Gierlinger S, Hosking K, Lenzen M, Tanikawa H, Miatto A, Fischman T (2016) Global material flows and resource productivity. Assessment report for the UNEP International Resource Panel. pp 30–47. http://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-material-flows-and-resource-productivity-database-link
  45. Science port Magdeburg (2018) Science port Magdeburg idea and concept, past, present. http://www.wissenschaftshafen.de/Home?La=2
  46. SMAQ Architektur und Stadt GmbH (2011) Science port – Magdeburg, Germany. http://www.smaq.net/2011/10/science-port-magdeburg-deutschland/?lang=en
  47. Stapleton DF (2018) Vietnam’s rapid growth fuels Ho Chi Minh property boom. Financial Times. Retrieved 26 July 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/e5170f58-2d07-11e8-97ec-4bd3494d5f14#comments-anchor
  48. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Swilling M, Hajer M, Baynes T, Bergesen J, Labbé F, Musango JK, Ramaswami A, Robinson B, Salat S, Suh S, Currie P, Fang A, Hanson A, Kruit K, Reiner M, Smit S, Tabory S (2018) The weight of cities: resource requirements of future urbanization. A report by the International Resource Panel (2018). United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, pp 50–71. http://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/weight-citiesGoogle Scholar
  50. Timmeren A (2014) The concept of the urban metabolism (UM). TU Delft, Department of Urbanism, Delft. https://urbanmetabolism.weblog.tudelft.nl/files/2016/07/05a_UrbanMetabolism_VanTimmeren.pdfGoogle Scholar
  51. United Nation Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2010) Planning sustainable cities. UN-Habitat Practices and Perspectives, Nairobi, p 6. https://unhabitat.org/planning-sustainable-cities-un-habitat-practices-and-perspectivesGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nation Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2012) Gender issue guide. Urban Planning and Design, Nairobi, p 5. https://unhabitat.org/books/gender-responsive-urban-planning-and-design/Google Scholar
  53. United Nation Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2016) Urbanization and development: emerging futures. World cities report 2016. Nairobi. https://unhabitat.org/books/world-cities-report/
  54. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
  55. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA) (2018a) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Download/
  56. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA) (2018b) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Maps/
  57. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2007) Liveable cities the benefits of urban environmental planning. Washington, DC. http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/CA_Docs/resources/cds/liveable/liveablecities_web_7dec07.pdf
  58. van Kempen R (2007) Divided cities in the 21st century: challenging the importance of globalisation. J Housing Built Environ 22(1):13–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41107366?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson WJ (1987) The truly disadvantage. The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolman A (1965) The metabolism of cities. Sci Am 213:178–190.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Bank (2017) World Bank open data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL
  62. Zuccetto J (1975) Energy-economic theory and mathematical models for combining the systems of man and nature, case study: the urban region of Miami, Florida. Ecol Model 1:241–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(75)90010-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Water, Environment, Civil Engineering and SafetyMagdeburg-Stendal University of Applied SciencesMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of the Environmental Science, Engineering & ManagementIndustrial University of Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi MinhVietnam

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ulla A. Saari

There are no affiliations available