Reduced Inequalities

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

New International Migration Management Technologies and Their Impact on Sustainability

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_120-1
  • 14 Downloads

Definitions

International migration management refers to the development and implementation of policies, programs, legislative measures, developmental projects, and performance of international and state actors (e.g., border agencies, immigration services, international organizations) related to international migration procedures and services, border control, migrant protection (e.g., counter-trafficking, protection of rights of migrants, and their families) as well as cross-border labor mobility.

Algorithm is a sequence of machine-readable commands aiming at performing a certain task, e.g., prioritization, classification, or clustering visa applications.

Artificial Intelligence is algorithmic technology that takes actions with some degree of autonomy based on the complex relations between input data (new, unseen data) and historical data.

Sustainability, Migration and AI – Connecting the Dots

Contrary to conventional wisdom, globalization and technological progress have not resulted...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abel GJ (2018) Estimates of global bilateral migration flows by gender between 1960 and 20151. Int Migr Rev, imre12327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12327
  2. AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Husband M, Adams C (2016) Sustainable refugee migration: a rethink towards a positive capability approach. Sustainability 8(5):451.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansak K, Ferwerda J, Hainmueller J, Dillon A, Hangartner D, Lawrence D, Weinstein J (2018) Report improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment. Science 359(6373):325–329.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beduschi A (2020) International migration management in the age of artificial intelligence. Migr Stud, mnaa003.  https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaa003
  6. Caliskan A, Bryson J, Narayanan A (2017) Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356(6334).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4230
  7. Careja R, Bevelander P (2018) Using population registers for migration and integration research: examples from Denmark and Sweden. CMS 6:19.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0076-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canada Federal Court (2015) Y. Z and the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, IMM-3700-13 2015 FC 892.Google Scholar
  9. Castelvecchi D (2016) Can we open the black box of AI? Nature 538(7623):20–23.  https://doi.org/10.1038/538020aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavazos et al (2020) Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: where are we on measuring race bias?. arXiv:1912.07398Google Scholar
  11. Chung EA (2019) Creating hierarchies of noncitizens: race, gender, and visa categories in South Korea. J Ethn Migr Stud:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2018.1561061
  12. Costello C, Mann I (2020) Border justice: migration and accountability for human rights violations. German Law J 21(3):311–334.  https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Council of Europe (2019) Declaration by the Committee of Ministers on the manipulative capabilities of algorithmic processes. Decl(13/02/2019)1Google Scholar
  14. Danks D, London AJ (2017) Algorithmic bias in autonomous systems. In: Sierra C (ed) Proceedings of the twenty-sixth international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Melbourne 19–25 Aug 2017Google Scholar
  15. Dekkers T, van der Woude M, Koulish R (2019) Objectivity and accountability in migration control using risk assessment tools. Eur J Criminol 16(2):237–254.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818771831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DHS (2017) DHS’ Pilots for social media screening need increased rigor to ensure scalability and long-term success. Department of Homeland Security, OIG-17-40Google Scholar
  17. Ferrie PJ, Hatton TJ (2013) Two centuries of international migration. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7896. BonnGoogle Scholar
  18. FRA (2018) Preventing unlawful profiling today and in the future: a guide. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  19. FRA (2019) Data quality and artificial intelligence – mitigating bias and error to protect fundamental rights. ViennaGoogle Scholar
  20. Geiger M, Pécoud A (2010) The politics of international migration management. In: Geiger M, Pécoud A (eds) The politics of international migration management. Migration, minorities and citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294882_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goralski M, Tan TK (2020) Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. Int J Manag Educ 18(1).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330
  22. Grubanov-Boskovic S, Kalantaryan S (2018) Trends and patterns of international migration and intentions to migrate. In: Migali et al (eds) International migration drivers. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.  https://doi.org/10.2760/63833
  23. Gundersen OE, Kjensmo S (2018) State of the art: reproducibility in artificial intelligence. In: Thirty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1644–1651. Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  24. Hague District Court (2020) Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v. The State of the Netherlands. C/09/550982/HA ZA 18-388Google Scholar
  25. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E (2019) The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell 1:389–399.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonathon Phillips P et al (2018) Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms. PNAS 115(24):6171–6176.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721355115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karp P (2020) Home affairs data breach may have exposed personal details of 700,000 migrants. The Guardian. Available via https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/may/03/home-affairs-data-breach-may-have-exposed-personal-details-of-700000-migrants Accessed 21 Aug 2020
  28. Klein Solomon M, Sheldon S (2018). The Global compact for migration: from the sustainable development goals to a comprehensive agreement on safe, orderly and regular migration, Int J Refugee Law 30(4): 584–590.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eey065
  29. Kosmala M, Wiggins A, Swanson A, Simmons B (2016) Fron Ecol Environ 14(10):551–560.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDonald H (2020) Visa applications: home office refuses to reveal ‘high risk’ countries. The Guardian. Available via https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/01/visa-applications-home-office-refuses-to-reveal-high-risk-countries Accessed 21 Aug 2020
  31. Migali S, Natale F, Tintori G, Kalantaryan S, Grubanov-Boskovic S, Scipioni M et al (2018) International migration drivers. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  32. Molnar P, Gill L (2018) Bots at the gate. a human rights analysis of automated decision-making in canada’s immigration and refugee system. International Human Rights Program/Citizen Lab.Google Scholar
  33. Nyoni B (2017) How artificial intelligence can be used to predict Africa’s next migration crisis. UNHCR. Available via https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/how-artificial-intelligence-can-be-used-to-predict-africas-next-migration-crisis/ Accessed 21 Aug 2020
  34. Papadopoulos T, Gunasekaran A, Dubey R, Altay N, Childe SJ, Fosso-Wamba S (2016) The role of big data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. J Clean Prod.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059
  35. Pijnenburg A, Gammeltoft-Hansen T, Rijken C (2018) Controlling migration through international cooperation. Eur J Migr Law 20(4):365–371.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poelzer G, Yu S (2020) All trust is local: Sustainable development, trust in government and legitimacy in northern mining projects. Resources policy, 101888.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101888
  37. Prince A, Schwarcz D (2019) Proxy discrimination in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Iowa L Rev 105:1257Google Scholar
  38. Přívara A, Přívarova M (2019) Nexus between climate change, displacement and conflict: Afghanistan case. Sustainability 11(20):5586.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. S.D.N.Y. Court (2020) Velesaca v. Decker. 20 Civ. 1803 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2020)Google Scholar
  40. Schumacher G, Loeschner J, Sermi F (2019) Data on children in migration. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.  https://doi.org/10.2760/3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stats NZ (2018) Algorithm assessment report, 2018. Available via https://www.data.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Algorithm-Assessment-Report-Oct-2018.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2021
  42. UK Parliament (2019) Visa processing algorithms. Hansard 662:316–326Google Scholar
  43. UN DESA (2019) International migration 2019 Available via: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/wallchart/docs/MigrationStock2019_Wallchart.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2020
  44. UNESCO/COMEST (2019) Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris. SHS/COMEST/EXTWG-ETHICS-AI/2019/1Google Scholar
  45. Villani C (2018) For a meaningful artificial intelligence – towards a French and European strategy. AI for Humanity. Available via https://www.aiforhumanity.fr/pdfs/MissionVillani_Report_ENG-VF.pdf Accessed 19 Feb 2021
  46. Wizman W (2020) The algorithm is watching you. London Review of Books. Available via https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2020/february/the-algorithm-is-watching-you. Accessed 21 Aug 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Poznan Human Rights Centre (Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences)PoznanPoland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Narasimha Reddy Donthi
    • 1
  1. 1.Ex-Member, Textile Exchange Advisory CouncilHyderabadIndia