Advertisement

Climate-Proof Retrofitting of Urban Areas for the Same Cost

  • L. KleerekoperEmail author
  • R. Loeve
  • J. Kluck
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Due to climate change the frequency of extreme precipitation increases. To reduce the risk of damage by flooding, municipalities will need to retrofit urban areas in a climate-resilient way. To justify this investment, they need insight in possibilities and costs of climate-resilient urban street designs. This chapter focused on how to retrofit characteristic (Dutch) typologies of urban residential areas. For ten cases alternative street layouts were designed with a determination of the life cycle costs and benefits. All designs are resilient to extreme rain events. The results show that most flat urban typologies can easily be retrofitted in a climate-resilient way without additional costs compared to the standard way of retrofitting. Climate proofing sloping areas are highly dependent on the situation downstream. When there is no space downstream to divert the water into waterways or parks, costs to provide storage easily rise above traditional levels for retrofitting. In addition to reducing flood risk, for each case one variant includes resilience to extreme heat events making use of green. The life cycle costs and benefits of the green variants showed that especially green designs in high-density urban areas result in a better value for money.

Keywords

Extreme rainfall events Climate adaptation Urban retrofitting Urban typologies Cost and benefits 

References

  1. Beersma J, Bessembinder J, Brandsma T, Versteeg R, Hakvoort H (2015) Actualisatie meteogegevens voor waterbeheer 2015. STOWA rapport 2015-10, november 2015. p 78Google Scholar
  2. Blänsdorf E (2015) Waterberging in de stad, natuurlijke wadi’s. www.molinia.net
  3. Boogaard FC, Jeurink N, Gels JHB (2003) Vooronderzoek natuurvriendelijke wadi's: inrichting, functioneren en beheer. STOWA/Rioned Publicatie, Utrecht. 2003–04, 36pGoogle Scholar
  4. Boogaard F, Wentink R, Vorenhout M, de Beer J (2016) Implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems to preserve cultural heritage – pilot Motte Montferland. Conserv Manag Archaeol Sites 18(1–3):328–341Google Scholar
  5. d. Jong TM, v.d. Voordt D (2002) Ways to study and research: urban, architectural and technical design. DUP Science, DelftGoogle Scholar
  6. Deltaprogramma Ruimtelijke adaptatie (2014) Deltabeslissing Ruimtelijke adaptatie: Het Deltaprogramma: een nieuwe aanpak. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu en Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  7. Hop MECM (2011) Vaste planten in openbaar groen. Voor functionele en onderhoudsvriendelijke toepassingen. Praktijkonderzoek Plant en Omgeving (PPO), WageningenUR, Boskoop, 47pGoogle Scholar
  8. Klaassen RKWM (2008) Water flow through wooden foundation piles: a preliminary study. Int Biodeter Biodegr 61(1):61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleerekoper L (2016) Urban climate design. Improving thermal comfort in Dutch neighbourhood typologies. Thesis, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  10. Kluck J, van Hogezand RJP, van Dijk E, van der Meulen J, Straatman JHM (2013) Extreme neerslag: Anticiperen op extreme neerslag in de stad. Hogeschool van Amsterdam: Kenniscentrum Techniek, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Kluck J, Loeve R, Bakker WJ, Kleerekoper L, Rouvoet MM, Wentink R, Viscaal J, Klok EJ, Boogaard F (2017a) Het klimaat past ook in uw straatje. De waarde van klimaatbestendig inrichten. Achtergronden [Background documentation]. Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA), Amsterdam, 49 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Kluck J, Kleerekoper L, Klok EJ, Loeve R, Bakker WJ, Boogaard FC (2017b) De klimaatbestendige wijk: Onderzoek voor de praktijk. Urban Technology paper number 10. Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hva), AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. Kluck J, Loeve R, Bakker WJ, Kleerekoper L, Rouvoet MM, Wentink R, Viscaal J, Klok EJ, Boogaard F (2018) The climate is right up your street. The value of retrofitting in residential streets, a book of examples. Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA), Amsterdam, 77 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. KNMI (2006) Klimaat in de 21e eeuw: vier scenario’s voor Nederland. mei 2006, 16pGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenderink G, van Oldenborgh GJ, van Meijgaard E, Attema J (2011) Intensiteit van extreme neerslag in een veranderend klimaat. Meteorologica 20(2):17–20Google Scholar
  16. Merkens J, Reimann L, Hinkel J, Vafeidis AT (2016) Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob Planet Chang 145:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding – a global assessment. PLoS One 10(3):e0118571.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Overeem A, Buishand TA (2012) Statistiek van extreme gebiedsneerslag in Nederland. KNMI, Technical report; TR-332, 4 mei 2012, 34p + bijlagenGoogle Scholar
  19. Stichting Rioned (2015) Leidraad Riolering D1100 (Sewer guide). Rioned, EdeGoogle Scholar
  20. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations