Quality Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Compromised Education: Seeing Through the Lens of Malaysian

  • Siok-Yee ChanEmail author
  • Theam Foo Ng
  • Siok Sin Chan
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69902-8_74-1

Definitions

Blendspace

A social platform that allows the creation of digital content for sharing such as interactive lessons, project, presentation, quizzes, and discussion.

Computer classe

A class that was formed to teach the student digital skills. This includes the use of Microsoft Office software.

Digital Natives

“A person born or brought up during the age of digital technology and so familiar with computers and the internet from an early age” adopted from Oxford English Dictionary.

eLearning

According to Oxford English Dictionary, eLearning has been defined as a system of learning which uses electronic media, typically over the Internet. This includes the use of Internet of things, gadget, mobile, and computer for teaching and learning purposes.

FC

Flipped classroom. A teaching method in which students first learn about a new subject at home, usually online video or pre-class materials, and then have collaborative and discussion on it in physical class – adopted from Chan et al. (

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abdel Karim N, Shukur Z (2016) Proposed features of an online examination interface design and its optimal values. Comput Hum Behav 64:414–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-rahmi WM, Othman MS, Yusuf LM (2015) The Effectiveness of using e-learning in Malaysian higher education: a case study Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mediterr J Soc Sci 6(52):625–637Google Scholar
  3. Azizi NA (02 January 2018) Twenty one schools closed nationwide due to floods, New Strait TimesGoogle Scholar
  4. Azlee A (05 January 2015) Worst floods in Kelantan, confirms NSC, malaymailGoogle Scholar
  5. Baharin AT, Lateh H, Nawawi H m, Nathan SS (2015) Evaluation of Satisfaction Using Online Learning with Interactivity. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 171:905–911.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baragash RS, Al-Samarraie H (2018) Blended learning: investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics Inform.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belanger F, Jordan DH (2000) Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: technologies, tools and techniques. IGI GlobalGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernama (01 January 2017) School session affected in three flood-afflicted states, Malay MailGoogle Scholar
  9. Boon P (25 June 2018) Plight of flood-prone schools brought to Education Ministry. Borneo Post OnlineGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan S-Y, Chan S-S (10–12 July 2018) Workbook reduction policy as a solution for “heavy bag phenomenon” in primary school? Paper presented at the international conference on the future of education Penang MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan S-Y, Lam YK, Ng TF (2018a) Student’s perception on initial experience of flipped classroom in pharmacy education: are we ready? Innov Educ Teach Int:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1541189
  12. Chan S-Y, Lam YK, Ng TF, Chan S-S (2018b) Emerging flipped classroom as teaching pedagogy: unravel the truth in Malaysia. Universiti Sains MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan S-Y, Nadzri M, Ng YC (12&13 September 2018c) A customized flipped classroom with the perfect match of the use of “mentimeter” as collaborative activity. Paper presented at the International university carnival on elearning, International Islamic University MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Chung C (26 Apr 2018) Comprehensive review planned for Chinese school computer classes, Star OnlineGoogle Scholar
  15. Fong LF (14 Oct 2017) School heads to follow order on workbooks, The Star OnlineGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghavifekr S, Sani IM (2015) Effectiveness of ICT integration in Malaysian schools: a quantitative analysis. Int Res J Q Educ 2(8):1–12Google Scholar
  17. Hamid S, Waycott J, Kurnia S, Chang S (2015) Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. Internet High Educ 26:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hui BY (29 July 2016) Chong: too many workbooks, The Star OnlineGoogle Scholar
  19. Iya SGD (2014) FLOODS IN MALAYSIA historical reviews, causes, effects and mitigations approach. Int J Interdiscip Res Innov 2(4):59–65Google Scholar
  20. Kabilan MK, Ahmad N, Abidin MJZ (2010) Facebook: an online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet High Educ 13(4):179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamarudin MY, Yusoff NMRN, Yamat@Ahmad H, Ghani KA (2016) Inculcation of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Arabic Language Teaching at Malaysian Primary Schools. Creat Educ:307–314.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.72030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malaymail (31 December 2016) New KSSM, KSSR curriculum to be implemented in 2017, says education minister, MalaymailGoogle Scholar
  23. Malaysiakini (01 March 2006) 华小校长贪污问题 “终于”不再敏感, MalaysiakiniGoogle Scholar
  24. Mansor MSA, Ismail A (2012) Learning styles and perception of engineering students towards online learning. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 69:669–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohsen AS (11 June 2018) Chinese schools told to cease illegal computer, tuition classes, The Sun DailyGoogle Scholar
  26. Salmon G (2005) Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J 13(3):201–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760500376439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/. Visited 19th May 2019
  28. Thowfeek MH, Jaafar A (2012) Instructors’ view about implementation of e-learning system: an analysis based on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 65:961–967.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. United Nation Foundation (2015) Sustainable development goal. 14 Spetember 2018Google Scholar
  30. Xanthidis D, Alali AS, Koutzampasopoulou O (2016) Online socializing: how does it affect the information seeking behavior and the educational preferences in Saudi Arabia? Comput Hum Behav 60:425–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zainuddin A, Kamaluddin N, Hassan Z f (2012) Exploring malay student’s commitment in online learning – a case of business management students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 67:81–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zamari ZM, Adnan AHM, Idris SL, Yusof J (2012) Students’ perception of using online language learning materials. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 67:611–620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.Centre for Global Sustainability StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPulau PinangMalaysia
  3. 3.Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina), SRJK (C), Bandar SpringhillLukutMalaysia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Olivia A. M. Freeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Journal of Advanced Cognitive EngineersSociety of Cognitive EngineersMELBOURNEUSA