Zero Hunger

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Agricultural Research: Applications and Future Orientations

  • Naser Valizadeh
  • Masoud BijaniEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69626-3_5-1

Synonyms

Definition

Agricultural research can be broadly defined as any research activity aimed at improving productivity and quality of crops by their genetic improvement, better plant protection, irrigation, storage methods, farm mechanization, efficient marketing, and a better management of resources (Loebenstein and Thottappilly 2007).

Introduction

The objective of this document is to provide a tool to understand aspects and future orientations of agricultural research. It begins with an overview of the concept and/or definition of agricultural research. It then focuses on the role of agricultural research in achieving the goals of 2030 Agenda, different types of agricultural researched, systemic research methodology in agriculture, and finally different kinds of use for agricultural research.

The Concept and Definition of Agricultural Research

Finding answers for questions about unknown phenomena in the agricultural area is the key to agricultural...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, Haas J, Gebbie KM (2007) Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res 42(1–1):329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alrøe HF, Kristensen ES (2002) Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: rethinking the role of values in science. Agric Hum Values 19(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anastasios M, Koutsouris A, Konstadinos M (2010) Information and communication technologies as agricultural extension tools: a survey among farmers in West Macedonia, Greece. J Agric Educ Ext 16(3):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijani M, Ghazani E, Valizadeh N, Fallah Haghighi N (2017) Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ concerns and behaviors towards soil conservation in central district of Sari County, Iran. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 5(1):43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg WR, Gall MD, Gall JP (1963) Educational research: an introduction. Longmans, New York & London p 704Google Scholar
  6. Damalas CA, Georgiou EB, Theodorou MG (2006) Pesticide use and safety practices among Greek tobacco farmers: a survey. Int J Environ Health Res 16(5):339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delavar A (2017) Research methods in psychology and educational sciences. Virayesh Publishing, Tehran. In PersianGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebrahimi Sarcheshmeh E, Bijani M, Sadighi H (2018) Adoption behavior towards the use of nuclear technology in agriculture: A causal analysis. Technol Soc 54(2018):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fallah Haghighi N, Bijani M, Parhizkar M (2019) An analysis of major social obstacles affecting human resource development in Iran. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 29(3):372–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 33(2):255–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleischer DN, Christie CA (2009) Evaluation use: results from a survey of US American Evaluation Association members. Am J Eval 30(2):158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2017) Food and agriculture – driving action across the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/a-i7454e.pdf
  13. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In NK Denzin, YS Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, pp 105–117. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  15. Habashiani R (2011) Qanat: a sustainable groundwater supply system. Master’s thesis, School of Arts and Social Science, James Cook University, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  16. Habibpour Gatabi K, Safari Shali R (2013) Comprehensive manual for using SPSS in survey researches. Looyeh Publications, TehranGoogle Scholar
  17. Henry GT, Mark MM (2003) Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. N Dir Eval 97:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iman MT (2009) Paradigmatic foundations of quantitative and qualitative research methods in humanities. Research Institute of Hawzah and University, Qom. In PersianGoogle Scholar
  19. Khoursandi-Taskouh A (2009) Typological diversity in interdisciplinary education and research. J Interdiscip Stud Humanit 1(4):57–83Google Scholar
  20. Lekka-Kowalik A (2010) Why science cannot be value-free. Sci Eng Ethics 16(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lockheed ME, Jamison T, Lau LJ (1980) Farmer education and farm efficiency: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 29(1):37–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G (2007) The mission of agricultural research. In: Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G (eds) Agricultural research management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madani K (2014) Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? J Environ Stud Sci 4(4):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Majidi F, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2017) Pathology of scientific articles publishing in the field of agriculture as perceived by faculty members and Ph. D. students (The case of colleges of agriculture at Public Universities, Iran). J Agric Sci Technol 19:1469–1484Google Scholar
  25. Malekian A, Hayati D, Aarts N (2017) Conceptualizations of water security in the agricultural sector: perceptions, practices, and paradigms. J Hydrol 544:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mennatizadeh M, Zamani G (2016) Water ethics: theoretical analysis of moral development theories. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 6:413–428Google Scholar
  27. Mohammadi-Mehr S, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2018) Factors affecting the aesthetic behavior of villagers towards the natural environment: The case of Kermanshah province, Iran. J Agric Sci Technol 20(7):1353–1367Google Scholar
  28. Morales FJ (2007) The mission and evolution of international agricultural research in developing countries. In: Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G (eds) Agricultural research management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 9–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patton MQ (2008) Utilization focused evaluation, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  30. Popa F, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raeisi AA, Bijani M, Chizari M (2018) The mediating role of environmental emotions in transition from knowledge to sustainable behavior toward exploit groundwater resources in Iran’s agriculture. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6(2):143–152Google Scholar
  32. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hil, BostonGoogle Scholar
  33. Schensul SL, Schensul JJ, LeCompte MD (2012) Initiating ethnographic research: a mixed methods approach, vol 2. AltaMira Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Leviton LC (1991) Foundations of program evaluation: theories of practice. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  35. Shahvali M (2013) Explanation of transcendental innovation system for sustainability. In: The proceedings of the Iranian and Islamic pattern of development, pp 1245–1267Google Scholar
  36. Shahvali M, Amiri Ardakani M (2011) Research methodology for agricultural indigenous knowledge. Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, TehranGoogle Scholar
  37. Shiri S, Bijani M, Chaharsoughi Amin H, Noori H, Soleymanifard A (2011) Effectiveness evaluation of the axial plan of wheat from expert supervisors’ view in Ilam province. World Appl Sci J 14(11):1724–1729Google Scholar
  38. Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2016) Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ participatory behavior toward conservation of surface water resources in southern sector of Urmia Lake’s catchment area. Iran Agric Ext Educ J 11(2):183–201. In PersianGoogle Scholar
  39. Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E (2018a) Farmers’ active participation in water conservation: insights from a survey among farmers in Southern Regions of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. J Agric Sci Technol 20(5):895–910Google Scholar
  40. Valizadeh N, Bijani M, Abbasi E, Ganguli S (2018b) The role of time perspective in predicting Iranian farmers’ participatory-based water conservation attitude and behavior. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 28:992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiss CH, Murphy-Graham E, Birkeland S (2005) An alternate route to policy influence: how evaluations affect D.A.R.E. Am J Eval 26(1):12–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yazdanpanah M, Hayati D, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Zamani GHH (2014) Understanding farmers’ intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: a case study in Iran. J Environ Manag 135:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zamani GHH (2016) Human liability theory: ethical approach towards agriculture and environment. Iran Agric Ext Educ J 12(1):149–163Google Scholar
  44. Zanoli R, Krell R (1999) Research methodologies in organic farming. Proceedings. REU technical series. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, School of AgricultureShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of AgricultureTarbiat Modares University (TMU)TehranIran

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural ManagementRasht Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityRashtIran