No Poverty

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Disaster Recovery Toward Attaining Sustainable Development Goals

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_56-1

Synonyms

Definitions

The word “recovery” incepted from Anglo-French “recoverie” since mid-14C which was defined to “return to health” (online etymology dictionary). Besides health science, it is used in technology, infrastructure, business, etc. to return back to previous stage. Disaster impacts in multi-sectors and disaster recovery means to recover the disrupted living conditions of disaster-affected people, restore the damaged physical assets, and rehabilitate the associated social and economic conditions. It is a process in which an individual or a community prepares for the post-disaster management including formulation of policies, regulations, plan, and strategies, provisioning of resources based on need assessment, and effectively implementing the interventions during emergency, recovery, and longer-term restoration. Recovery is the action of the restoration or revitalization of economic, physical, social, cultural, and environmental assets of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acquilla S, Bertell R, Dhara VR, Tognoni G (2005) Aftermath of the world’s worst chemical disaster: Bopal, December 1984. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(4-5):268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ADB (2013) The rise of natural disasters in Asia and the Pacific: learning from ADB’s experience. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong CityGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander D (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management. Terra Publishing/Academic, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander DE (2013) Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2707–2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton A (1970) Community in disaster garden city. Anchor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Berke P, Smith G (2009) Hazard mitigation, planning, and disaster resiliency: challenges and strategic choices for the 21st century. Building safer communities. Risk governance, spatial planning and responses to. Nat Hazards 1:18Google Scholar
  7. Berke PR, Kartez J, Wenger D (1993) Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17(2):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolin R, Stanford L (1998) The Northridge earthquake: community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs. Disasters 22(1):21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Committee on Disaster Research in the Social Science (CDRSS) (2005) Facing hazards and disasters: understanding human dimensions. The National Academy of Sciences, The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. CRED and UNISDR (2016) Poverty and death: disaster mortality 1996–2015. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster, Brussels, Belgium, The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunford M, Li L (2011) Earthquake reconstruction in Wenchen: assessing the state overall plan and addressing the forgotten phase. Appl Geogr 31:998–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frerichs RR, Keim PS, Barrais R, Piarroux R (2012) Nepalese origin of cholera epidemic in Haiti. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:E158–E163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03841.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardoni P, Murphy C (2008) Recovery from natural and man-made disasters as capabilities restoration and enhancement. Int J Sus Dev Plann 3(4):317–333Google Scholar
  14. GFDRR (2017) Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery: strategy 2018–2021. http://www.gfdrr.org
  15. GoN/NPC (2015) Nepal earthquake 2015 post disaster need assessment report. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  16. Gotham KF, Greenberg M (2008) Post- disaster recovery and rebuilding in New York and New Orleans. Soc Forces 87(2):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunderson LH, Folke C, Janssen M (2006) Generating and fostering novelty. Ecol Soc 11(1):50. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art50/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haas JE, Kates RW, Bowden (eds) (1977) Reconstruction following disaster. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iuchi K, Maly E (2016) Roles of people, community and planning in recovery after mega-disasters: a symposium synopsis. J Disaster Res 11(3):512–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson LA, Olshansky RB (2016) After great disasters: how six countries managed community recovery. The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kates R (1977) Major insights: a summary and recommendations. In: Hass JE, Kates RW, Bowden MJ (eds) Reconstruction following disaster. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 261–293Google Scholar
  23. Kim K, Olshansky RB (2014) The theory and practice of building back better. J Am Plann Assoc 80(4):289–292.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.988597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindell MK (2013) Recovery and reconstruction after disaster. In: Bobrowsky PT (ed) Encyclopedia of natural hazards. Springer, New York, pp 812–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Masten AS, Obradovic J (2008) Disaster preparation and recovery lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecol Soc 13(1):9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art9/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MDF-JRF (2012) MDF-JRF working paper series: lessons learned from post disaster reconstruction in Indonesia: adapting community driven approaches for post disaster recovery: experience from Indonesia. MDF-JRF Secretariat, The World Bank Office, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  27. Perry RW, Lindell MK, Tierney KJ (eds) (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Petrovic N, Bosnjak I, Nedeljkovic S (2017) Disaster risk reduction for sustainable development goals. Eur Proj Manag J 7(2):27–35Google Scholar
  29. Platt S (2018) Factors affecting the speed and quality of post disaster recovery and resilience. In: Rupakhety R, Olafsson S (eds) Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics in memory of Prof. Ragnar Sigbjörnsson: selected topics. Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 44. Springer, Netherlands, pp 369–403Google Scholar
  30. Prince S (1920) Catastrophe and social change. Longmans, Green and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Quarantelli EL (1987) Disaster studies: an analysis of the social historical factors affecting the development of research in the area. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 5(3):285–310Google Scholar
  32. Rubin CB, Saperstein MD, Barbee DG (1985) Community recovery from a major natural disaster. FMHI, publications, paper 87. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/fmhi_pub/87
  33. Silbert M, Useche M (2012) Repeated natural disasters and poverty in island nations: a decade of evidence from Indonesia. PURC Working Paper. University of Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith GP, Wenger DE (2007) Sustainable disaster recovery: operationalizing an existing agenda. In: Rodríguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 234–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith G, Martin A, Wenger DE (2018) Disaster recovery in an era of climate change: the unrealized promise of institutional resilience. In: Rodríguez H, Donner W, Trainor J (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, Cham, pp 595–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tobin GA (1999) Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazards planning? Global Environ Change B Environ Hazard 1(1):13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UN (2010) The Chilean earthquake of 27 February 2010: an overview, disaster assessment unit of ECLAC. United Nations, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  38. UNDP (2016) National post-disaster recovery planning and coordination. A guidance note. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. UNISDR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO (2006) Health effects of the Chernobyl accident and special health care program. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  41. WHO (2020) Coronavirus disease pandemic update. Available from: https://who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nepal Open UniversityLalitpurNepal
  2. 2.National Disaster Risk Reduction CenterKathmanduNepal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ranjit Voola
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Sydney Business SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia