Advertisement

Woods

  • Yonah LevyEmail author
  • B. M. Hausen
Reference work entry

Abstract

The incidence of wood dermatitis is quite small although it may be greater due to underreporting in countries from which no reports reach the public. The literature concerns commonly only case reports.

Woods cause allergic and irritant dermatitis, often with an airborne pattern. Contact urticaria, photocontact dermatitis, and erythema multiform are uncommon or rare.

In most cases, occupational dermatitis caused by wood occurs in individuals working with raw wood such as cabinetmakers, carpenters, sawmill workers, and lumberjacks. Fine sanding of wood is particularly risky.

The chemical substances responsible for allergic reactions are mostly benzo-, naphtho-, furano-, and phenanthrene quinones, stilbenes, phenolic compounds, and terpenes.

The chemical substances responsible for the majority of nonallergic reactions are alkaloids, glycosides, anthraquinones, saponins, phenols, and flavonoids.

Botanical identification of the suspected wood is essential; otherwise a description of the case is useless and proper advice to the patient often difficult. Trade names are often confusing and misleading. Almost always the help of a wood taxonomist is required for botanical identification.

Keywords

Wood Dermatitis Allergic Irritant Occupational Chemical Identification Classification Trade Carpenters 

References

  1. Aalto-Korte K, Lauerma A, Alanko K (2005) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from lichens in present-day Finland. Contact Dermatitis 52:36–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RM, Gimenezarnau JM (1991) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the sawdust of Grevillea robusta; A. CUNN. Am J Contact Dermatitis 3:192–193Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1987) Health effects of exposure to wood dust: a summary report of the literature. US Department of Health and Human Services/Public Health Service Centers of Disease Control, National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  4. Athavale PN, Shum KW, Gasson P, Gawkrodger DJ (2003) Occupational hand dermatitis in a wood turner due to rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia). Contact Dermatitis 48:345–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck MH, Hausen BM, Dave VK (1984) Allergic contact dermatitis from Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. (Pao ferro) in a joinery shop. Clin Exp Dermatol 9:159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer WE (1970) Sensitizing to Iroko wood in a wood machinist. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 7:159Google Scholar
  7. Bleumink E, Nater JP (1974) Allergic reaction to (tropical) woods. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 16:436Google Scholar
  8. Bleumink E, Mitchell JC, Nater JP (1973) Allergic contact dermatitis from cedar wood (Thuja plicata). Br J Dermatol 88:499–504PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonny M, Aerts O, Jo L, Julien L, Lapeere H (2013) Occupational contact allergy caused by pao ferro (santos rosewood): a report of two cases. Contact Dermatitis 68:126–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booken D, Velten FW, Utikal J, Goerdt S, Bayerl C (2006) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch Kolophonium und terpentin in Harzen unbehandelter Kieferholzmöbel. Hautarzt 57:1013–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bottenbruch S, Hausen BM, Plewig G (1988) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch Honduras-Palisander (Dalbergia stevensonii STANDLEY). Aktuel Dermatol 14:164–166Google Scholar
  12. Bourne LB (1956) Dermatitis from mansonia wood. Br J Ind Med 13:55–58PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Brasch J, Geier J, Gefeller O (1996) Dynamic patterns of allergic patch test reactions in 10 European standard allergens. Contact Dermatitis 35:17–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown PM, Thomson RH, Hausen BM (1974) Uumlber die Inhaltstoffe von Bowdichia nitida BENTH. Liebigs Ann Chem 1295–1300Google Scholar
  15. Burry JN, Kirk J, Reid GJ, Turner T (1973) Environmental dermatitis: patch test in 1000 cases of allergic contact dermatitis. Med J Austr 2:681–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buschke A, Joseph A (1927) Uumlber Hautentzuumlndung, hervorgerufen durch Makassarholz, mit Beruuml; cksichtigung gewerbehygienischer Fragen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 53:1641–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cabanillas M, Fernández-Redondo V, Toribio J (2006) Allergic contact dermatitis to plants in a Spanish dermatology department: a 7-year review. Contact Dermatitis 55:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calnan CD (1972) Dermatitis from cedar wood pencils. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 58:43–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Conde-Salazar L, Garcia Diez A, Rafeensperger F, Hausen BM (1980) Contact allergy to the Brazilian rosewood substitute Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. (Pao ferro). Contact Dermatitis 6:246–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cook DK, Freeman S (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis to multiple sawdust allergens. Australas J Dermatol 38:77–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Correale CE, Marks JG (2002) Contact dermatitis in a woodworker. Am J Contact Dermat 13:42–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Correira O, Antonio Barros M, Mesquita Guimares J (1992) Airborne contact dermatitis from the woods Acacia melanoxylon and Entandophragma cylindricum. Contact Dermatitis 27:343–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crocker HR (1903) Diseases of the skin, 3rd edn. Lewis, London, p 418Google Scholar
  24. Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  25. Cronin E, Calnan CD (1975) Rosewood knife handle. Contact Dermatitis 1:121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dantin-Gallego J, Armayor AF, Riesco J (1952) Some new toxic woods. Some new manifestations of toxicity. Ind Med Surg 21:41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. De Cock P, Van Ginkel CJ, Faber WR, Bruynzeel DP (2000) Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from sawdust in livestock. Contact Dermatitis 42:113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis eczema caused by obeche and teak dust. Contact Dermatitis 41:164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ezzedine K, Rafii N, Heenen M (2007) Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis to an exotic wood; a very harmful toilet seat. Contact Dermatitis 57:128–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Findlay LJ (1972) An unusual case of rosewood dermatitis of the genus Dalbergia (East Indian rosewood). Br J Ind Med 29:343–344Google Scholar
  31. Freise FW (1932) Gesundheitsschaumldigungen durch Arbeiten mit giftigen Houmllzern. Beobachtungen aus brasilianischen Gewerbebetrieben. Arch Gewerbepathol Hyg 3:1–14Google Scholar
  32. Gallo R, Guarrera M, Hausen BM (1996) Airborne contact dermatitis from East Indian rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia Roxb.). Contact Dermatitis 35:60–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gómez-Muga S, Ratón-Nieto JA, Ocerin I (2009) An unusual case of contact dermatitis caused by wooden bracelets. Contact Dermatitis 61:351–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gonccedilalo S (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis from Bowdichia nitida (Sucupira) wood. Contact Dermatitis 26:205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gougerot H, Blamoutier J (1929) Dermite eczeacutemateuse professionelle due agrave; la poudre de palissandre. Bull Soc Med Hocircp 15:739–743Google Scholar
  36. Guanche AD, Prawer S (2003) Generalized eczematous contact dermatitis from cocobolo wood. Am J Contact Dermat 14:90–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanslian L, Kadlec K (1965) A contribution to the problem of eczematogenic effect of Mansonia-wood. Prac Lek 17:392–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hausen BM (1981) Woods injurious to human health. W de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hausen BM (1982) Haumlufigkeit und Bedeutung toxischer und allergischer Kontaktdermatitiden durch Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. (Pao ferro), einem Ersatzholz fuumlr Palisander (Dalbergia nigra). Hautarzt 33:321–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hausen BM (1983) Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Allergologie 6:194–197Google Scholar
  41. Hausen BM (1985) Chin rest allergy in a violinist. Contact Dermatitis 12:178–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hausen BM (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis from a wooden necklace. Am J Contact Dermat 8:185–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hausen BM, Kuhlwein A (1983) Allergisches Kontaktekzem bei einer Handballspielerin. Aktuel Dermatol 9:126–130Google Scholar
  44. Hausen BM, Muumlnster G (1983) Cocobolo-Holz, ein vergessenes Ekzematogen. Dermatosen 31:110–117Google Scholar
  45. Hausen BM, Simatupang MH, Kingreen JC (1972) Untersuchungen zur Uumlberempfindlichkeit gegen Sucipura- und Palisanderholz. Berufsdermatosen 20:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hausen BM, Kuhlwein A, Schmalle HW (1984) Kontaktallergie auf ein “afrikanisches Ebenholz”, Grenadill-Dalbergia melanoxylon. Aktuel Dermatol 10:221–223Google Scholar
  47. Hausen BM, Bruhn G, Tilsley AD (1990a) Contact allergy to Australian blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon R. Br.): isolation and identification of new hydroxyflavan sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 23:33–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hausen BM, Krohn K, Budianto E (1990b) Contact allergy due to colophony. VII–sensitizing studies with oxidation products of abietic and related acids. Contact Dermatitis 23:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hausen BM, Bruhn G, Koumlnig WA (1991) New hydroxyisoflavans as contact sensitizers in cocus wood Brya ebenus. (Fabaceae). Contact Dermatitis 25:149–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hausen BM, Knight TE, Milbrodt M (1997) Thespesia populnea dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 8:225–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Haustein UF (1982) Violin chin rest eczema due to East Indian rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia ROXB). Contact Dermatitis 8:77–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Heyl U (1966) Kontaktekzem bei Uumlberempfindlichkeit gegen Sucupira- und Pailsanderholz. Berufsdermatosen 14:239–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hinnen U, Willa-Craps C, Elsner P (1995) Allergic contact dermatitis from iroko and pine wood dust. Contact Dermatitis 33:428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hjorth N (1961) Contact sensitivity to plants and balsams. Acta Derm Venereol 41(Suppl 46):65–79Google Scholar
  55. Hoffman TE, Hausen BM, Adams RM (1985) Allergic contact dermatitis to “silver oak” wooden arm bracelet. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:778–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Holst R, Kirby J, Magnusson B (1976) Sensitization to tropical woods giving erythema multiforme like eruptions. Contact Dermatitis 2:295–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Horner S, Wigley JEM (1936) A case of dermatitis venenata due to Mansonia wood (Sterculia altissima). Br J Dermatol 48:26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Huilaja L, Kubin M, Riekki R (2016) Contact allergy to finished woods in furniture and furnishings: a small allergic contact dermatitis epidemic to western red cedar in sauna interior decoration. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 30:57–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jensen P, Benfeldt E, Menne T, Thyssen J (2016) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis following exposure to the Central American hardwood cocobolo. Contact Dermatitis 74:52–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jung HD (1967) Berufliche Kontaktekzeme durch Kambala-Teak-Holz. Dtsch Gesundheitswes 22:2141–2143Google Scholar
  61. Kanerva L, Tuppurainen M, Keskinen H (1998) Contact urticaria caused by obeche wood (Triplochiton scleroxylon). Contact Dermatitis 38:170–171Google Scholar
  62. Karlberg AT, Gaumlfvert E, Meding B, Stenberg B (1996) Airborne contact dermatitis from unexpected exposure to rosin (colophony). Contact Dermatitis 35:272–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Katzenellenbogen I (1955) Caterpillar dermatitis as an occupational disease. Dermatologica 111:99–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Swierczynska-Machura D, Palczynski C (2004) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by padauk wood (Pterocarpus soyauxii Taub). Contact Dermatitis 50:384–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. King FE, Grundon MF (1949) The constitution of chlorophorin, a constituent of iroko, the timber of Chlorophora excelsa. Part I. J Chem Soc 699:3348–3352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. King FE, Grundon MF (1950) The constitution of chlorophorin. Part II. Further oxidation experiments and the completion of the structural problem. J Chem Soc 702:3547–3552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Knight TE, Hausen BM (1992) Koa wood (Acacia koa) dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 3:30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Knight TE, Whitesell CD (1992) Grevillea robusta (Silver oak) dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 3:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Koh WL, Ang CC, Lim SPR (2016) A rare case of occupational contact urticaria syndrome caused by meranti wood dust. Wiley Online Libr 75:56–58Google Scholar
  70. Kop E, Van Ginkel C, Rockmann H, Van der Valk P (2012) A case of occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by faveira amargosa, a tropical timber. Contact Dermatitis 66:344–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Krohn K, Muumlller H, Adiwidjaja G, Jarchow OH, Schmalle HW, Hausen BM, Schulz KH (1986) The structure of the tetra-acetate of the allergen chlorophorin. Z Kristall 174:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kubin M, Riekki R (2014) Allergic contact eczema caused by exotic wood material in sauna interior decoration. Wiley Online Libr 70:255–256Google Scholar
  73. Larsen WG, Adams RM, Maibach HI (1992) Color text of contact dermatitis. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  74. Machado D, Loureiro G, Taveres B, Calado G, Pereira C (2011) Hand contact dermatitis made a patient blind for the second time! J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 21:154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. MacKee GM (1913) Dermatitis venenata from cocobolo-wood. J Cutan Dis 31:582–583Google Scholar
  76. Majamaa H, Vijanen P (2004) Occupational facial allergic contact dermatitis caused by Finnish pine and spruce wood dusts. Contact Dermatitis 51:157–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin P, Bergoend H, Piette F (1980) Erythema multiforme – like eruption from Brazilian rosewood. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on contact dermatitis. Barcelona, p 42Google Scholar
  78. May SB (1960) Dermatitis due to Grevillea robusta (Australian silky oak). Arch Dermatol 82:1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Meister H (1934) Uumlber eine neue Aumlthiologie fuumlr Gesichtsekzeme. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 43:993Google Scholar
  80. Milbrodt M, Koumlnig WA, Hausen BM (1997) 7-hydroxy-2,3,5,6-tetrahydro-3,6,9-trimethylnaphtho[1,8bc]pcyran-4,8-dione from Thespesia populnea (L.) Sol. Phytochemistry 45:1523–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Miranda Bastos AD, de Matos Filho A (1962) A “Jacaranda” timber causing dermatitis. In: Proceedings of the 5th world forest congress, vol 3. 29 Aug–10 Sep 1960. Seattle, pp 1414–1416Google Scholar
  82. Mitchell JC, Rook A (1979) Botanical dermatology. Greengrass, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  83. Modlmayer H (1931) Palisander-bzw. Cocoboloholz-dermatitis. Zentralbl Haut Geschlechtskrankheiten 36:728Google Scholar
  84. Moratinos MM, Tevar E, Conde-Salazar L (2005) Contact allergy to cocobolo bracelet. Dermatitis 16:139–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Morgan JWW, Orsler RJ (1967) A simple test to distinguish Khaya anthotheca from Khaya ivorensis and Khaya grandifoliola. J Inst Wood Sci 18:61–64Google Scholar
  86. Morgan JWW, Thomson J (1967) Miscellanea (Ayan dermatitis). Br J Ind Med 24:156–158PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Morgan JWW, Wilkinson DS (1965) Sensitization to Khaya anthotheca. Nature 207:1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Morgan JWW, Orsler RJ, Wilkinson DS (1968) Dermatitis due to the wood dust of Khaya anthotheca and Machaerium scleroxylon. Br J Ind Med 25:119–125PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Nava C, Mardisio M, Priatino Vangova G, Arbosti G (1975) Aspetti della malattia di Mansonia altissima. Med Lav 66:574–576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Neisser EJ (1907) Internationale Uumlbersicht uumlber Gewerbehygiene nach den Berichten der Gewerbeinspektionen der Kulturlaumlnder. Bibliothek fuer Soziale Medezin no. 1. Gutenberg, Berlin, p 225Google Scholar
  91. O’Reilly FM, Murphy GM (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis in a beautician. Contact Dermatitis 35:47–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Orsler RJ (1969) The effect of irritant timbers. Woodworking Ind 26:28–29Google Scholar
  93. Pereira Marques MSJ (1989) Dermite de contacto aacute Cambala. Bol Inf Gruppo Port E Dermatite Contato 3:23–24Google Scholar
  94. Pires MC, Silva M, dos Reis V, Mitelmann R, Moreira F (1999) Pigmented contact dermatitis due to Plathymenia foliosa dust. Contact Dermatitis 40:339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pontes de Carvalho L (1956) Dos allergenos de contato nas profissotildees. Braz Med 70:77–88Google Scholar
  96. Rackett SC, Zug KA (1997) Contact dermatitis to multiple exotic woods. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8:114–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Rao R, Balachandran C (2010) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to teak wood. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 76:278–288Google Scholar
  98. Räsänen L, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational contact allergy from beechwood. Contact Dermatitis 38:55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Roed-Petersen J, Menneacute T, Mann Nielsen K, Hjorth N (1987) Is it possible to work with Pao ferro (Machaerium scleroxylon TUL.)? Arch Dermatol Res 279:108–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rojas-Hijazo B, Lezaun A, Hausen BM, Segura N, Mar Garcés M, Colás C (2007) Airborne contact dermatitis in gaitas (flageolets) constructors after exposure to sawdust of caviuna. Contact Dermatitis 56:274–277 and Contact Dermatitis 57:68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sak M, Uhrik J, Fabian J, Stracenska H, Hermanova E (1983) Dermatoacutezy vyvolaneacute drevinon Machaerium scleroxylon. Cesk Dermatol 58:89–91Google Scholar
  102. Sandermann W, Dietrichs HH (1959) Uumlber die Inhaltstoffe von Mansonia altissima und ihre gesundheitsschaumldigende Wirkung. Holz als+Roh Wstoff 17:88–97Google Scholar
  103. Sandermann W, Simatupang MH (1962) Ein toxisches Chinon aus teakholz. Angew Chem 74:782–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Scheman AJ, Xu Y, Osborne A (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis to Fraxinus americanus and Macherium acutifolium. Am J Contact Dermatitis 10:233–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Schmidt P (1963) Experimentelle Untersuchungen uumlber die Sensibilisierungsfaumlhigkeit von akzessorischen Inhaltstoffen tropischer Houmllzer. Medical thesis, University of HamburgGoogle Scholar
  106. Schmidt H (1978) Contact urticaria to teak with systemic effects. Contact Dermatitis 4:176–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Schulz KH (1957) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch exotische Houmllzer insbesondere durch Kambala-Teakholz. Berufsdermatosen 5:3–9Google Scholar
  108. Schulz KH (1967) Berufsdermatosen – ausgewaumlhlte Kapitel. Z Haut Geschlechtskrankheiten 42:449–509Google Scholar
  109. Schulz KH, Dietrichs HH (1962) Chinone als sensibilisierende Bestandteile von Rio Palisander (Dalbergia nigra) und Cocobolo (Dalbergia retusa) Holz. Allerg Asthma 8:125–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Schulz KH, Garbe I, Hausen BM, Simatupang MH (1979) The sensitizing capacity of naturally occurring quinones. Part II. Benzoquinones. Arch Dermatol Res 264:275–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schwartz L (1931) Dermatitis venenata due to contact with Brazilian walnut wood. Public Health Rep 46:1938–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Serrano P, Medeiros S, Quilhó T, Santos R, Brandão FM (2008) Photoallergic contact dermatitis to brosimum wood. Contact Dermatitis 58:243–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Shevljakov LV (1974) Occupational skin diseases in the wood industry abroad and in the USSR. Gig Tr Professionalnye Zabolevanija 18:33–36Google Scholar
  114. Shimizu S, Chen KR, Pratchyapruit WO, Shimizu H (2000) Tropical-wood-induced bullous erythema multiforme. Dermatology 200:59–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Steinbrink W (1950) Besondere Beobachtungen an allergischen Krankheiten. Z Gesamten Inn Med 5:311–314Google Scholar
  116. Stingeni L, Mariotti M, Lisi P (1998) Airborne allergic contact dermatitis from iroko (Chlorophora excelsa). Contact Dermatitis 38:287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Stingeni L, Proietti G, Zeppa L, Lisi P (2008) Occupational airborne contact dermatitis from Machaerium scleroxylon; a simple method for extracting quinones from wood. Contact Dermatitis 58:117–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Storrs FJ, Mitchell JC, Rasmussen JE (1976) Contact hypersensitivity to liverwort in the compositae family of plants. Cutis 18:681–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Suskind RR (1967) Dermatitis in the forest product industries. Arch Environ Health 15:322–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tanaka S, Matsumoto Y, Tamada Y (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis due to perupok wood. Contact Dermatitis 48:273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Tilsley DA (1990) Australian blackwood dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 23:40–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Veien NK, Hausen BM (2000) Contact dermatitis associated with an erythema multiforme-like eruption. Am J Contact Dermat 11:235–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Viardot-Helmer A, Merk HF, Hausen BM (2008) Spättypensensibilisierung gegen Ostindisch-Palisander. Hautarzt 59:465–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. White JC (1903) Dermatitis venenata – a supplement list. J Cutan Dis 21:441–455Google Scholar
  125. Wilkinson DS (1968) Khaya woods. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 3:44Google Scholar
  126. Wilkinson DS (1971) (Patch) tests with different species of Khaya woods. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 9:216Google Scholar
  127. Wilkinson DS, Buddan MG, Hambly EM (1980) A 10-year review of an industrial dermatitis clinic. Contact Dermatitis 6:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wlodek C, Lovell C (2014) Contact dermatitis caused by ebony wood. Contact Dermatitis 71:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Woods B, Calnan CD (1976) Toxic woods. Br J Dermatol 95(Suppl 13):1–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Zakaria MB, Jeffreys JAD, Waterman PG, Zhong SM (1984) Naphthoquinones and triterpenes from Asian Diospyros species. Phytochemistry 23:1481–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zhong SM, Watermann PG, Jeffreys JAD (1984) Naphthoquinones and triterpenes from African Diospyros species. Phytochemistry 23:1067–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zug KA, Marks JR (1999) Plants and woods. In: Occupational skin disease, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 547–569Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCSFSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations