Advertisement

Acrylic Resins

  • Kristiina Aalto-KorteEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Contact allergy to acrylic resin monomers is most often induced by artificial nails, anaerobic glues, and dental products, which usually contain aliphatic methacrylates. Patients exposed to methacrylate products commonly have allergic reactions to a large number of different methacrylates. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA), ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), and 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA) are the most commonly positive, due to the strong cross-allergy between them. Other commonly positive methacrylates include ethyl methacrylate (EMA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TREGDMA), and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate (THFMA). Patients have not necessarily been exposed to all patch test-positive methacrylates.

Some products contain mostly aliphatic acrylates, e.g., UV-cured printing inks, lacquers, paints, varnishes, and glues. Contact allergy to acrylates is relatively rare. The main aliphatic acrylate allergens in these products include tripropyleneglycol diacrylate (TPGDA), and dipropyleneglycol diacrylate (DPGDA). Exposure to acrylates does usually not lead to cross-allergy to methacrylates.

Dental composite resins, UV-curable printing inks, and some glues contain epoxy acrylates such as bis-GMA and bis-GA. Most of the reactions to epoxy acrylates are cross-allergies to epoxy resin – about 20% of epoxy resin allergic patients react to some epoxy acrylates. Specific allergy to epoxy acrylates is rare, and diagnosis requires testing with the specific compound(s).

Cyanoacrylates and acrylamide derivatives are also rare independent allergens, which cannot be screened by other acrylic compounds, e.g., 2-HEMA.

Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylic resins typically affects the fingertips.

Risk occupations include beauticians (nail technicians), assemblers of machines and mechanical devices, dentists, dental nurses, dental technicians, printers, painters, and workers in paint factories.

Keywords

Acrylate Methacrylate Cyanoacrylate Epoxy acrylate Glue Artificial nail Paint Coating Varnish Printer UV-cure Beautician Nail technician Dentist Dental nurse Dental technician Lash extension Assembler 

References

  1. Aalto-Korte K, Jolanki R, Suuronen K, Estlander T (2002) Biochemist’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis from iodoacetamide and acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 47:361–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R (2007a) Late reactions in patch tests: a 4-year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 56:81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R (2007b) Methacrylate and acrylate allergy in dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis 57:324–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R (2008) Occupational methacrylate and acrylate allergy from glues. Contact Dermatitis 58:340–346PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Aalto-Korte K, Jungewelter S, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R (2009) Contact allergy to epoxy (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 61:9–21PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee PP, Banerjee S, Brown TR (2001) Increased androgen receptor expression correlates with development of age-dependent, lobe-specific spontaneous hyperplasia of the brown Norway rat prostate. Endocrinology 142:4066–4075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bang Pedersen N (1998) Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylic resin repair of windscreens. Contact Dermatitis 39:99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer W (2010) Methacrylic acid and derivatives. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  9. Belsito DV (1987) Contact dermatitis to ethyl-cyanoacrylate-containing glue. Contact Dermatitis 17:234–236PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyer DJ, Belsito DV (2000) Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylamide in a chemical mixer. Contact Dermatitis 42:181–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhargava K, White JM, White IR (2012) Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis caused by ethyl cyanoacrylate-containing eyelash adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 67:306–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjorkner B (2006) Acrylic resins. In: Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P (eds) Contact dermatitis, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 584–594Google Scholar
  13. Bjorkner B, Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1980) Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in ultraviolet curing inks. Contact Dermatitis 6:405–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bjorkner B, Niklasson B, Persson K (1984) The sensitizing potential of di-(meth)acrylates based on bisphenol A or epoxy resin in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 10:286–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bong JL, English JS (2000) Allergic contact dermatitis from airborne exposure to acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 43:242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brooke RC, Beck MH (2002) A new source of allergic contact dermatitis from UV-cured (meth)acrylate adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 47:179–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruze M, Bjorkner B, Lepoittevin JP (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 32:156–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christoffers WA, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar ML (2013) Two decades of occupational (meth)acrylate patch test results and focus on isobornyl acrylate. Contact Dermatitis 69:86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conde-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Romero LV (1988) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealants. Contact Dermatitis 18:129–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conde-Salazar L, Rojo S, Guimaraens D (1998) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from cyanoacrylate. Am J Contact Dermat 9:188–189PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Conde-Salazar L, Vargas I, Tevar E, Barchino L, Heras F (2007) Sensitization to acrylates in varnishes. Dermatitis 18:45–48PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Constandt L, Hecke EV, Naeyaert JM, Goossens A (2005) Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails. Contact Dermatitis 52:73–77PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Craig RG, Welker D, Rothaut J, Krumbholz G, Stefan KP, Dermann K, Rehberg HJ, Franz G, Lehmann KM, Borchert M (2010) Dental materials. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  24. Dahlin J, Berne B, Dunér K, Hosseiny S, Matura M, Nyman G, Tammela M, Isaksson M (2016) Several cases of undesirable effects caused by methacrylate ultraviolet-curing nail polish for non-professional use. Contact Dermatitis 75:151–156PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Dempsey KJ (1982) Hypersensitivity to Sta-Lok and Loctite anaerobic sealants. J Am Acad Dermatol 7:779–784PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dooms-Goossens A, Garmyn M, Degreef H (1991) Contact allergy to acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 24:71–72PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Emmett EA (1977) Contact dermatitis from polyfunctional acrylic monomers. Contact Dermatitis 3:245–248PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Emmett EA, Kominsky JR (1977) Allergic contact dermatitis from ultraviolet cured inks. Allergic contact sensitization to acrylates. J Occup Med 19:113–115PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from UV-cured lacquer containing dipropylene glycol diacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 39:36PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Estlander T, Alanko K, Jolanki R (2006) Dental materials. In: Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P (eds) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 653–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fregert S (1978) Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylacrylate in a window sealant. Contact Dermatitis 4:56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fremlin G, Sansom J (2014) Acrylate-induced allergic contact dermatitis in a car windscreen repairer. Occup Med (Lond) 64:557–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, Schnuch A (2007) Are concomitant patch test reactions to epoxy resin and BIS-GMA indicative of cross-reactivity? Contact Dermatitis 57:376–380PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Geukens S, Goossens A (2001) Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 44:153–159PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Goon AT, Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Bruze M (2006) Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 55:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goossens A, Coninx D, Rommens K, Verhamme B (1998) Occupational dermatitis in a silk-screen maker. Contact Dermatitis 39:40–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gruvberger B, Bruze M, Almgren G (1998) Occupational dermatoses in a plant producing binders for paints and glues. Contact Dermatitis 38:71–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Guerra L, Vincenzi C, Peluso AM, Tosti A (1993) Prevalence and sources of occupational contact sensitization to acrylates in Italy. Contact Dermatitis 28:101–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guimaraens D, Gonzalez MA, Del Rio E, Conde-Salazar L (1994) Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis in the national mint and fiscal-stamp factory. Contact Dermatitis 30:172–173PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Guin JD, Work WJ (1995) Other plastics. In: Guin JD (ed) Practical contact dermatitis, a handbook for the practioner. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 433–475Google Scholar
  41. Hemmer W, Focke M, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis to artificial fingernails prepared from UV light-cured acrylates. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:377–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Henriks-Eckerman ML, Suuronen K, Jolanki R, Alanko K (2004) Methacrylates in dental restorative materials. Contact Dermatitis 50:233–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Holme SA, Statham BN (2000) A cluster of 6 cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis from (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 43:179–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Isaac MA, Thiboutot DM, Vasily DB, Marks JG (1992) Contact dermatitis from printing inks. Am J Contact Dermat 3:142–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Isaksson M, Zimerson E (2007) Risks and possibilities in patch testing with contaminated personal objects: usefulness of thin-layer chromatograms in a patient with acrylate contact allergy from a chemical burn. Contact Dermatitis 57:84–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Sundberg K, Hallander A, Bruze M (2005) The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 53:292–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T, Tarvainen K (1994) Concomitant sensitization to triglycidyl isocyanurate, diaminodiphenylmethane and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate from silk-screen printing coatings in the manufacture of circuit boards. Contact Dermatitis 30:12–15PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by epoxy diacrylate in ultraviolet-light-cured paint, and bisphenol A in dental composite resin. Contact Dermatitis 33:94–99PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T (2000a) Epoxy resins. In: Kanerva LEP, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 570–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Kanerva L (2000b) Patch testing with a patient’s own materials handled at work. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Suhonen R (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from phenoxyethoxy ethylacrylates in optical fiber coating, and glue in an insulin pump set. Contact Dermatitis 45:36–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kanerva L (2001) Cross-reactions of multifunctional methacrylates and acrylates. Acta Odontol Scand 59:320–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kanerva L, Alanko K (1998) Stomatitis and perioral dermatitis caused by epoxy diacrylates in dental composite resins. J Am Acad Dermatol 38:116–120PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Kanerva L, Zwanenburg R (2000) Allergic contact reactions to poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) alpha, alpha′-[(1-methylethylidene)di-4, 1-phenylene]bis[omega-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy](BIS-EMA). Contact Dermatitis 43:115–157Google Scholar
  55. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1986) Occupational dermatitis due to an epoxy acrylate. Contact Dermatitis 14:80–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1988) Sensitization to patch test acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 18:10–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 20:201–211PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Tarvainen K (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis 28:268–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Leino T, Estlander T (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified acrylic structural adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 33:84–89PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Estlander T, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Jolanki R (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by photobonded sculptured nails and a review of (meth) acrylates in nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat 7:109–115PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Kanerva L, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1997) Plastics/acrylics: material safety data sheets need to be improved. Clin Dermatol 15:533–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kanerva L, Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Estlander T (1998) Airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) used in the manufacture of printed circuit boards. Contact Dermatitis 38:292–294PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Alanko K (2000) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2,2-bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-acryloxypropoxy)phenyl]-propane (epoxy diacrylate) in ultraviolet-cured inks. Contact Dermatitis 43:56–59PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Swierczynska-Machura D, Zaremba J (2005) An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an acrylic glue. Contact Dermatitis 52:121–125PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Lambert J, Matthieu L, Dockx P (1988) Contact dermatitis from acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 19:65PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Langvardt PW (2010) Acrylonitrile. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  67. Lazarov A (2007) Sensitization to acrylates is a common adverse reaction to artificial fingernails. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21:169–174PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Lee HN, Pokorny CD, Law S, Pratt M, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ (2002) Cross-reactivity among epoxy acrylates and bisphenol F epoxy resins in patients with bisphenol A epoxy resin sensitivity. Am J Contact Dermat 13:108–115PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Mäkelä EA, Jolanki J (2005) Chemical permeation through disposable gloves. In: Boman A, Estlander T, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Protective gloves for occupational use. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 299–314Google Scholar
  70. Malten KE, van der Meer-Roosen CH, Seutter E (1978) Nyloprint-sensitive patients react to N,N′ methylene-bis-acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 4:214–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Matura M, Poesen N, de Moor A, Kerre S, Dooms-Goossens A (1995) Glycidyl methacrylate and ethoxyethyl acrylate: new allergens in emulsions used to impregnate paper and textile materials. Contact Dermatitis 33:123–124PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Maurice PD, Rycroft RJ (1986) Allergic contact dermatitis from UV-curing acrylate in the manufacture of optical fibres. Contact Dermatitis 15:92–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Minamoto K, Ueda A (2005) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to ultraviolet-cured acrylic glue. J Occup Health 47:340–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Montgomery R, Stocks SJ, Wilkinson SM (2016) Contact allergy resulting from the use of acrylate nails is increasing in both users and those who are occupationally exposed. Contact Dermatitis 74:120–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Muttardi K, White IR, Banerjee P (2016) The burden of allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 75:180–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nethercott JR, Jakubovic HR, Pilger C, Smith JW (1983) Allergic contact dermatitis due to urethane acrylate in ultraviolet cured inks. Br J Ind Med 40:241–250PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Ohara T, Sato T, Shimizu N, Prescher G, Schwind H, Weiberg O, Marten K, Greim H (2010) Acrylic acid and derivatives. In: Ullman’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  78. Onusseit H, Wefringhaus R, Dreezen G, Wichelhaus J, Schall J, Thiele L, van Halteren A (2010a) Adhesives, 1. General. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  79. Onusseit H, Wefringhaus R, Dreezen G, Kneafsey B, Wichelhaus J, Bachon T, Becker K, Chen C, Dausmann D, Gillitzer T, Gossen R, Gupta S, Holloway M, Iida K, Jacobine AF, Kopannia S, Lammerschop O, Lu D, Mayer B, Meckel-Jonas C, Picker S, Pröbster M, Ruytens M, Sattler HP, Schöttmer B, Windhövel U (2010b) Adhesives, 2. Applications. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (electronic), 7 edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  80. Pedersen NB, Chevallier MA, Senning A (1982) Secondary acrylamides in Nyloprint printing plate as a source of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 8:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pedersen NB, Senning A, Nielsen AO (1983) Different sensitising acrylic monomers in Napp printing plate. Contact Dermatitis 9:459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pham HQ, Marks MJ (2010) Epoxy Resins. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  83. Ramos L, Cabral R, Goncalo M (2014) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates and methacrylates – a 7-year study. Contact Dermatitis 71:102–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ (1996) Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians. (I). Clinical picture and causative factors. Contact Dermatitis 34:125–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sanchez-Perez J, Gonzalez-Arriba A, Goiriz R, Garcia-Diez A (2008) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates and methacrylates. Contact Dermatitis 58:252–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sauni R, Kauppi P, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Tuppurainen M, Hannu T (2008) Occupational asthma caused by sculptured nails containing methacrylates. Am J Ind Med 51:968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Saval P, Kristiansen E, Cramers M, Lander F (2007) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by aerosols of acrylate monomers. Contact Dermatitis 57:276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scotnicki S, Pratt MD (1998) Occupational dermatitis to ultraviolet-cured acrylic-based inks in computer hard disc manufacturing. Am J Contact Dermat 9:179–181Google Scholar
  89. Shanmugam S, Wilkinson M (2012) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a cyanoacrylate-containing false eyelash glue. Contact Dermatitis 67:309–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shimizu A, Kamada N, Kambe N, Matsue H (2008) Chemical burn caused by glycidyl methacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 59:316–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sood A, Taylor JS (2003) Acrylic reactions: a review of 56 cases. Contact Dermatitis 48:346–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Streitberger HJ, Urbano E, Laible R, Meyer BD, Bagda E, Waite FA, Philips M (2010) Paints and coatings, 3. Paint systems. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (electronic), 7th edn. Wiley, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  93. Teik-Jin Goon A, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Isaksson M (2007) Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 57:21–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tomb RR, Lepoittevin JP, Durepaire F, Grosshans E (1993) Ectopic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate instant adhesives. Contact Dermatitis 28:206–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tucker SC, Beck MH (1999) A 15-year study of patch testing to (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 40:278–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Whittington CV (1981) Dermatitis from UV acrylate in adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 7:203–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wrangsjo K, Swartling C, Meding B (2001) Occupational dermatitis in dental personnel: contact dermatitis with special reference to (meth)acrylates in 174 patients. Contact Dermatitis 45:158–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Occupational MedicineFinnish Institute of Occupational HealthHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations