Advertisement

Adverse Effects of Skin Protective Products, Including Sunscreens

  • Sibylle SchliemannEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Adverse effects to skin protective products are rare in general. Potential side effects include aggravation of preexisting disease, e.g. irritant contact dermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis. Potential contact allergens include preservatives, emulsifiers, and fragrances. It is recommended to include patient’s own skin protection products when patch testing in case the hand dermatitis does not improve or is even worsening in spite of secondary prevention efforts. Confirmatory repetitive open application tests (ROAT) may be useful in doubtful reactions.

Keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis Barrier cream Photoallergic contact dermatitis Sunscreens Systemic absorption 

References

  1. Agin PP, Ruble K, Hermansky SJ, McCarthy TJ (2008) Rates of allergic sensitization and irritation to oxybenzone-containing sunscreen products: a quantitative meta-analysis of 64 exaggerated use studies. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 24(4):211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allmers H (2001) Wearing test with 2 different types of latex gloves with and without the use of a skin protection cream. Contact Dermatitis 44(1):30–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade P, Goncalo M, Figueiredo A (2010) Allergic contact dermatitis to decyl glucoside in Tinosorb M. Contact Dermatitis 62(2):119–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avenel-Audran M (2010) Sunscreen products: finding the allergen. Eur J Dermatol 20(2):161–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Avenel-Audran M, Dutartre H, Goossens A, Jeanmougin M, Comte C, Bernier C, Benkalfate L, Michel M, Ferrier-Lebouedec MC, Vigan M, Bourrain JL, Outtas O, Peyron JL, Martin L (2010) Octocrylene, an emerging photoallergen. Arch Dermatol 146(7):753–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baur X, Chen Z, Allmers H, Raulf-Heimsoth M (1998) Results of wearing test with two different latex gloves with and without the use of skin-protection cream. Allergy 53(4):441–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boman A, Mellstrom G (1989) Percutaneous absorption of 3 organic solvents in the guinea pig. (III). Effect of barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 21(3):134–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruynzeel DP, Ferguson J, Andersen K, Goncalo M, English J, Goossens A, Holzle E, Ibbotson SH, Lecha M, Lehmann P, Leonard F, Moseley H, Pigatto P, Tanew A (2004) Photopatch testing: a consensus methodology for Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18(6):679–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryden AM, Moseley H, Ibbotson SH, Chowdhury MM, Beck MH, Bourke J, English J, Farr P, Foulds IS, Gawkrodger DJ, George S, Orton DI, Shaw S, McFadden J, Norris P, Podmore P, Powell S, Rhodes LE, Sansom J, Wilkinson M, van Weelden H, Ferguson J (2006) Photopatch testing of 1155 patients: results of the U.K. multicentre photopatch study group. Br J Dermatol 155(4):737–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cahill J, Nixon R (2005) Allergic contact dermatitis to quaternium 15 in a moisturizing lotion. Australas J Dermatol 46(4):284–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Communities, C. o. t. E (2007) Commission directive 2007 / 17 / EC of 22 March 2007. Off J Eur Union 82:27–30Google Scholar
  12. Cook N, Freeman S (2001) Report of 19 cases of photoallergic contact dermatitis to sunscreens seen at the Skin and Cancer Foundation. Australas J Dermatol 42(4):257–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darvay A, White IR, Rycroft RJ, Jones AB, Hawk JL, McFadden JP (2001) Photoallergic contact dermatitis is uncommon. Br J Dermatol 145(4):597–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Groot A (ed) (2009) Patch testing. Acdegroot Publishing, WapserveenGoogle Scholar
  15. de Groot AC, van der Walle HB, Jagtman BA, Weyland JW (1987) Contact allergy to 4-isopropyl-dibenzoylmethane and 3-(4′-methylbenzylidene) camphor in the sunscreen Eusolex 8021. Contact Dermatitis 16(5):249–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fartasch M (2009) Skin protection. From TRGS 401 to guidelines on “occupational skin protection products”. Hautarzt 60(9):702–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fartasch M, Diepgen TL, Drexler H, Elsner P, John SM, Schliemann S (2015) S1 guideline on occupational skin products: protective creams, skin cleansers, skin care products (ICD 10: L23, L24)--short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 13(6):594–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I, Kurte A (1993) Efficacy of skin barrier creams (I). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 28(2):94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghazavi MK, Johnston GA (2011) Photo-allergic contact dermatitis caused by isoamyl p-methoxycinnamate in an ‘organic’ sunscreen. Contact Dermatitis 64(2):115–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glanz K, Buller DB, Saraiya M (2007) Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure among outdoor workers: state of the evidence and recommendations. Environ Health 6:22PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goh CL (1991) Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin (I). Cutting oil dermatitis and barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 24(1):16–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haisma MS, Schuttelaar ML (2017) Contact urticaria caused by the ultraviolet absorber octocrylene in sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 77(4):254–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannuksela M, Salo H (1986) The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 14(4):221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heydorn S, Menne T, Johansen JD (2003) Fragrance allergy and hand eczema – a review. Contact Dermatitis 48(2):59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johansen JD, Veien NK, Laurberg G, Kaaber K, Thormann J, Lauritzen M, Avnstorp C (2005) Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile – data from a ‘front line’ network. Contact Dermatitis 52(3):138–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kai AC, White JM, White IR, Johnston G, McFadden JP (2011) Contact dermatitis caused by C30-38 olefin/isopropyl maleate/MA copolymer in a sunscreen. Contact Dermatitis 64(6):353–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karlsson I, Vanden Broecke K, Martensson J, Goossens A, Borje A (2011) Clinical and experimental studies of octocrylene’s allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis 64(6):343–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klede M, Schmitz H, Goen T, Fartasch M, Drexler H, Schmelz M (2005) Transcutaneous penetration of toluene in rat skin a microdialysis study. Exp Dermatol 14(2):103–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korinth G, Geh S, Schaller KH, Drexler H (2003) In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of skin barrier creams and protective gloves on percutaneous absorption of industrial solvents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76(5):382–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korinth G, Weiss T, Angerer J, Drexler H (2006) Dermal absorption of aromatic amines in workers with different skin lesions: a report on 4 cases. J Occup Med Toxicol 1:17PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korinth G, Weiss T, Penkert S, Schaller KH, Angerer J, Drexler H (2007) Percutaneous absorption of aromatic amines in rubber industry workers: impact of impaired skin and skin barrier creams. Occup Environ Med 64(6):366–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loden M (1986) The effect of 4 barrier creams on the absorption of water, benzene, and formaldehyde into excised human skin. Contact Dermatitis 14(5):292–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundov MD, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, Johansen JD (2010) Prevalence and cause of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 63(3):164–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacKenzie-Wood AR, Freeman S (1997) Severe allergy to sorbolene cream. Australas J Dermatol 38(1):33–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy LA, White IR (2003) Contact dermatitis from geraniol in washing-up liquid. Contact Dermatitis 49(1):52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pesonen M, Jolanki R, Larese Filon F, Wilkinson M, Krecisz B, Kiec-Swierczynska M, Bauer A, Mahler V, John SM, Schnuch A, Uter W, E. network (2015) Patch test results of the European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe – analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network, 2002–2010. Contact Dermatitis 72(3):154–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinola A, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Tarvainen K, Kanerva L (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to coconut diethanolamide (cocamide DEA). Contact Dermatitis 29(5):262–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez-Pedreno P, Garcia-Bravo B, Frias-Iniesta J (2009) Contact allergy to tetrasodium EDTA in a sunscreen. Contact Dermatitis 61(2):125–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schauder S, Ippen H (1997) Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Review of a 15-year experience and of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 37(5):221–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schliemann S, Kleesz P, Elsner P (2013) Protective creams fail to prevent solvent-induced cumulative skin irritation – results of a randomized double-blind study. Contact Dermatitis 69(6):363–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schliemann S, Schmidt C, Elsner P (2014) Tandem repeated application of organic solvents and sodium lauryl sulphate enhances cumulative skin irritation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 27(3):158–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schliemann-Willers S, Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P (2001) Efficacy of a new class of perfluoropolyethers in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 81(6):392–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmitt J, Diepgen T, Bauer A (2011) Occupational exposure to non-artificial UV-light and non-melanocytic skin cancer – a systematic review concerning a new occupational disease. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 8(4):250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Uter W (2011) Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996–2009. Br J Dermatol 164(6):1316–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tanko Z, Shab A, Diepgen TL, Weisshaar E (2009) Polyvalent type IV sensitizations to multiple fragrances and a skin protection cream in a metal worker. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 7(6):541–543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Topham EJ, Wakelin SH (2003) D-limonene contact dermatitis from hand cleansers. Contact Dermatitis 49(2):108–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, IVDK (2017) Is octocrylene a frequent contact allergen? Contact Dermatitis 77(2):127–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vauhkala AR, Pesonen M, Suomela S, Kuuliala O, Suuronen K, Aalto-Korte K (2015) Occupational contact allergy to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis 73(3):150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Victor FC, Cohen DE, Soter NA (2010) A 20-year analysis of previous and emerging allergens that elicit photoallergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 62(4):605–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang SM, Shih TS, Huang YS, Chueh MR, Chou JS, Chang HY (2006) Evaluation of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment against occupational exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide. J Hazard Mater 138(3):518–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wigger-Alberti W, Rougier A, Richard A, Elsner P (1998) Efficacy of protective creams in a modified repeated irritation test. Methodological aspects. Acta Derm Venereol 78(4):270–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wong CS, Beck MH (2001) Occupational contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in abrasive cleansers and work creams. Contact Dermatitis 44(5):311–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wong T, Orton D (2011) Sunscreen allergy and its investigation. Clin Dermatol 29(3):306–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-UniversityJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations