Mechanisms of Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Allergenicity depends on several factors determined by the very physicochemical nature of the molecules themselves, i.e., their capacity to penetrate the horny layer, lipophilicity, and chemical reactivity. The sensitizing property of the majority of contact allergens could be predicted from these characteristics (Patlewicz et al., Contact Dermatitis 50:91–97, 2004; Gerberick et al., Altern Lab Anim 36(2):215–242, 2008). Two other factors, however, further contribute to the allergenicity of chemicals, namely, their pro-inflammatory activity and capacity to induce maturation of LC. These issues will be dealt with in more detail in the following sections.
Along with their migration and settling within the draining lymph nodes, haptenized LC further mature, as characterized by their increased expression of costimulatory and antigen-presentation molecules (Cumberbatch et al., Arch Dermatol Res 289:277–284, 1997; Heufler et al. J Exp Med 167:700–705, 1988). In addition, they adopt a strongly veiled, interdigitating appearance, thus maximizing the chances of productive encounters with naive T lymphocytes and recognition of altered self (Steinman et al., J Invest Dermatol 105:2S–7S, 1995; Furue et al., Br J Dermatol 135:194–198, 1996; Schuler and Steinman, J Exp Med 161:526–546, 1985).
The intricate structure of lymph node paracortical areas, the differential expression of chemokines and their receptors, the characteristic membrane ruffling of IDC, and the predominant circulation of naïve T lymphocytes through these lymph node areas provide optimal conditions for T-cell-receptor binding, i.e., the first signal for induction of T-cell activation (Banchereau and Steinman, Nature 392:245–252, 1998). Intimate DC–T-cell contacts are further strengthened by secondary signals, provided by sets of cellular adhesion molecules, and growth-promoting cytokines (reviewed in Hommel, Immunol Cell Biol 82:62–66, 2004; Cella et al., Curr Opin Immunol 9:10–16, 1997).
In healthy individuals, primary skin contacts with contact allergens lead to differentiation and expansion of allergen-specific effector T cells displaying Th1, Th2, and/or Th17 cytokine profiles. The same allergens, if encountered along mucosal surfaces, favor the development of allergen-specific Th2 and Th17 effector cells, and/or Th3 and Tr1 allergen-specific regulatory T cells. Whereas the first two subsets may assist or replace Th1 cells in pro-inflammatory effector functions, the latter two subsets are mainly known for downregulating immune responsiveness. For most, if not all allergens, along with prolonged allergenic contacts, the role of Th2 cells as effector cells gradually increases given reduced longevity of Th1 responses.
The respective contributions of similar subsets of allergen-specific CD8 + T cells are still unknown, but distinct effector roles of allergen-specific Tc1 and Tc2 have been postulated.
Priming via the skin results in CLA positive T cells, which upon inflammatory stimuli preferentially enter the skin; on the other hand, gut homing T cells have been primed and generated along mucosal surfaces. Upon priming, T cells loose much of their capacity to recirculate via the lymph nodes, but gain the capacity to enter the tissues. In particular recently activated T cells will enter skin inflammatory sites. ACD reactions are primarily infiltrated by CD4 and/or CD8 pro-inflammatory cells, later reactions may be dominated by Th2 cells and regulatory T cells. Skin infiltation by T cells is fine-tuned by sets of adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors, whose expression is not rigid, but can be modulated by micro-environmental factors.
After antigenic activation the progeny of primed T cells is released via the efferent lymphatics into the bloodstream. Circulating allergen-specific cells can be challenged in vitro to provide diagnostic parameters for contact hypersensitivity. At least for water-soluble allergens, like metal salts, the degree of allergen-specific proliferation and cytokine production, in particular type-2 cytokines, correlate with clinical allergy. For routine application of a broad spectrum of allergens, culture conditions still need to be improved. For mechanistic in vitro studies in ACD, however, with selected sets of relatively nontoxic allergens, peripheral blood provides an excellent source of lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells.
ACD reactions can be mediated by classical effector cells, i.e., allergen-specific CD4+ type-1 T cells which, upon triggering by allergen-presenting cells, produce IFN-γ to activate nonspecific inflammatory cells like macrophages. However, CD8 + T cells, and other cytokines, including IL-4, IL-17, and IL-22 can also play major roles in ACD. The conspicuous difference with DTH reactions induced by intradermal administration of protein antigens, i.e., the epidermal infiltrate, can largely be attributed to hapten-induced chemokine release by keratinocytes.
KeywordsActivation-induced cell death Bandrowski’s base Effector memory T cells Imprinting process Langerhans cells Prehaptens Prohaptens Tetrachlorosalicylanilide
- Bergstresser PR (1989) Sensitization and elicitation of inflammation in contact dermatitis. In: Norris DA (ed) Immune mechanisms in cutaneous disease. Dekker, New York, pp 219–246Google Scholar
- Bretscher PA, Ogunremi O, Menon JN (1997) Distinct immunological states in murine cutaneous leishmaniasis by immunizing with different amounts of antigen: the generation of beneficial, potentially harmful, harmful and potentially extremely harmful states. Behring Inst Mitt 98:153–159Google Scholar
- Bridoux F, Badou A, Saoudi A, Bernard L, Druet E, Pasquier R, Druet P, Pelletier L (1997) Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta)-dependent inhibition of T helper cell 2 (Th2)-induced autoimmunity by self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-specific, regulatory CD4+ T cell lines. J Exp Med 185:1769–1775PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cavani A, Mei D, Guerra E, Corinti S, Giani M, Pirrotta L, Puddu P, Girolomoni G (1998) Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel and nonallergic individuals display different nickel-specific T cell responses. Evidence for the presence of effector CD8+ and regulatory CD4+ T cells. J Invest Dermatol 111:621–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coulter EM, Jenkinson C, Farrell J, Lavergne SN, Pease C, White A, Aleksic M, Basketter D, Williams DP, King C, Pirmohamed M, Park BK, Naisbitt DJ (2010) Measurement of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte cytokine secretion and gene expression changes in p-phenylenediamine allergic patients and tolerant individuals. J Invest Dermatol 130:161–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dieu M-C, Vanbervliet B, Vicari A, Bridon J-M, Oldham E, Ait-Yahia S, Brière F, Zlotnik A, Lebecque S, Caux C (1998) Selective recruitment of immature and mature dendritic cells by distinct chemokines expressed in different anatomic sites. J Exp Med 188:373–386PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gell PDH, Coombs RRA, Lachman R (1975) Clinical aspects of immunology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gerberick F, Aleksic M, Basketter D, Casati S, Karlberg AT, Kern P, Kimber I, Lepoittevin JP, Natsch A, Ovigne JM, Rovida C, Sakaguchi H, Schultz T (2008) Chemical reactivity measurement and the predicitve identification of skin sensitisers. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 64. Altern Lab Anim 36(2):215–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goebeler M, Meinardus-Hager G, Roth J, Goerdt S, Sorg C (1993) Nickel chloride and cobalt chloride, two common contact sensitizers, directly induce expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule (ELAM-1) by endothelial cells. J Invest Dermatol 100:759–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Inaba K, Schuler G, Steinman RM (1993) GM-CSF – a granulocyte/macrophage/dendritic cell stimulating factor. In: Van Furth R (ed) Hemopoietic growth factors and mononuclear phagocytes. Karger, Basel, pp 187–196Google Scholar
- Isaksson M, Bruze M (2003) Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure. Am J Contact Dermatol 14:154–156Google Scholar
- Matura M (1998) Contact allergy to locally applied corticosteroids. Thesis, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
- Murphy K, Travers P, Walport M (eds) (2008) Janeway’s immunobiology, 7th edn. Garland Science/Taylor & Francis Group, New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Nagira M, Imai T, Hieshima K, Kusuda J, Ridanpaa M, Takagi S, Nishimura M, Kakizaki M, Nomiyama H, Yoshie O (1997) Molecular cloning of a novel human CC chemokine secondary lymphoid-tissue chemokine that is a potent chemoattractant for lymphocytes and mapped to chromosome 9p13. J Biol Chem 272:19518–19524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oukka M (2008) Th17 cells in immunity and autoimmunity. In: Ann Rheum Dis 67(Suppl 3):iii26–iii29Google Scholar
- Patlewicz GY, Basketter DA, Pease CK, Wilson K, Wright ZM, Roberts DW, Bernard G, Arnau EG, Lepoittevin JP (2004) Further evaluation of quantitative structure–activity relationship models for the prediction of the skin sensitization potency of selected fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 50:91–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pober JS, Bevilacqua MP, Mendrick DL, Lapierre LA, Fiers W, Gimbrone MA Jr (1986) Two distinct monokines, interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor, each independently induce biosynthesis and transient expression of the same antigen on the surface of cultured human vascular endothelial cells. J Immunol 136:1680–1687PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Polak L (1980) Immunological aspects of contact sensitivity. An experimental study. Monogr Allergy 15:4–60Google Scholar
- Polak L, Turk JL (1968a) Studies on the effect of systemic administration of sensitizers in guinea-pigs with contact sensitivity to inorganic metal compounds. II. The flare-up of previous test sites of contact sensitivity and the development of a generalized rash. Clin Exp Immunol 3:253–262PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Polak L, Turk SL (1968b) Studies on the effect of systemic administration of sensitizers in guinea pigs with contact sensitivity to inorganic metal compounds. I. The induction of immunological unresponsiveness in already sensitized animals. Clin Exp Immunol 3:245–251PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rambukhana A, Bos JD, Irik D, Menko WJ, Kapsenberg ML, Das PK (1995) In situ behaviour of human Langerhans cells in skin organ culture. Lab Investig 73:521–531Google Scholar
- Saint-Mezard P, Krasteva M, Chavagnac C, Bosset S, Akiba H, Kehren J, Kanitakis J, Kaiserlian D, Nicolas JF, Berard F (2003) Afferent and efferent phases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) can be induced after a single skin contact with haptens: evidence using a mouse model of primary ACD. J Invest Dermatol 120:641–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt M, Raghavan B, Müller V, Vogl T, Fejer G, Tchaptchet S, Keck S, Kalis C, Nielsen PJ, Galanos C, Roth J, Skerra A, Martin SF, Freudenberg MA, Goebeler M (2010) Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel. Nat Immunol 11(9):814–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schnuch A, Westphal GA, Muller MM, Schulz TG, Geier J, Brasch J, Merk HF, Kawakubo Y, Richter G, Koch P, Fuchs T, Gutgesell T, Reich K, Gebhardt M, Becker D, Grabbe J, Szliska C, Aberer W, Hallier E (1998) Genotype and phenotype of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) polymorphism in patients with contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 38:209–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shimizu Y, Newman W, Gopal TV, Horgan KJ, Graber N, Beall LD, van Seventer GA, Shaw S (1991) Four molecular pathways of T cell adhesion to endothelial cells: roles of LFA-1, VCAM-1, and ELAM-1 and changes in pathway hierarchy under different activation conditions. J Cell Biol 113:1203–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skog E (1976) Spontaneous flare-up reactions induced by different amounts of 1,3-dinitro-4-chlorobenzene. Acta Derm Venereol 46:386–395Google Scholar
- Tsuji RF, Geba GP, Wang Y, Kawamoto K, Matis LA, Askenase PW (1997) Required early complement activation in contact sensitivity with generation of local C5-dependent chemotactic activity, and late T cell interferon g: a possible initiating role of B cells. J Exp Med 186:1015–1026PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turk JL (1975) Delayed hypersensitivity, 2nd edn. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Van Hoogstraten IMW, Andersen JE, von Blomberg BME, Boden D, Bruynzeel DP, Burrows D, JMG C, Dooms-Goossens A, Lahti A, Menné T, Rycroft R, Todd D, KJJ V, Wilkinson JD, Scheper RJ (1989) Preliminary results of a multicenter study on the incidence of nickel allergy in relationship to previous oral and cutaneous contacts. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, RJG R, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 178–184Google Scholar
- von Blomberg BME, Bruynzeel DP, Scheper RJ (1991) Advances in mechanisms ofallergic contact dermatitis: in vitro and in vivo research. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (eds) Dermatotoxicology, 4th edn. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, pp 255–362Google Scholar
- Wardorf HA, Walsh LJ, Schechter NM (1991) Early cellular events in evolving cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity in humans. Am J Pathol 138:477–486Google Scholar
- Weiss JM, Sleeman J, Renkl AC, Dittmar H, Termeer CC, Taxis S, Howells N, Hofmann M, Kohler G, Schöpf E, Ponta H, Herrlich P, Simon JC (1997) An essential role for CD44 variant isoforms in epidermal Langerhans cell and blood dendritic cell function. J Cell Biol 137:1137–1147PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wong BR, Josien R, Lee SY, Sauter B, Li HL, Steinman RM, Choi YW (1997) TRANCE (Tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-related activation-induced cytokine), a new TNF family member predominantly expressed in T cells, is a dendritic cell-specific survival factor. J Exp Med 186:2075–2080PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar