Advertisement

Industrial Perennial Crops for a Post-Petroleum Materials Economy

  • Eric ToensmeierEmail author
  • Ann Blake
Reference work entry

Abstract

The challenges of climate change, soil degradation through industrial agriculture, unpredictable rainfall and longer droughts, and the toxic legacy of industrial chemicals in our bodies have a common source in the global petroleum economy. The material economy must be transformed in concert with the transitioning energy economy. A post-petroleum material economy needs to replace petroleum-based chemical and material feedstocks with nontoxic, preferably endlessly recyclable materials from renewable feedstocks for our current and future material usage. Perennial industrial crops could meet these needs while also sequestering carbon, restoring soil organic matter, and increasing water retention, thereby mitigating multiple climate concerns while reducing the toxic burden of current chemical and materials feedstocks.

There is a promising body of perennial industrial crops that are nondestructively harvested that could replace fossil fuels as feedstocks for materials and chemicals. Such feedstocks could utilize marginal lands (thereby not competing with land needed for food and fuel), remove carbon from the air (via biosequestration), restore soil organic matter, and increase water retention to address current global drought. As perennial crops, these feedstock source options have powerful ongoing carbon sequestration capacity whose potential has not yet been fully realized.

Perennial industrial crops could provide biomass, starch, sugar, oil, hydrocarbons, fiber, and other products. Biomass feedstocks can replace a variety of petroleum-based chemicals currently used to manufacture solvents, resins, stabilizers, dispersants, binders, and fillers. Starch feedstocks can be used to manufacture solvents, paints, glues, coagulants, flocculants, textile finishing agents, and many other materials. Perennial industrial crop oils can be made into glycerin, soaps, lubricants, surfactants, and surface coatings. Plant-sourced hydrocarbons can be used as feedstocks for the full range of modern industrial chemistry.

References

  1. 1.
    Bio-based Industries Consortium(2016) European bioeconomy in figures. http://biconsortium.eu/sites/biconsortium.eu/files/news-image/16-03-02-Bioeconomy-in-figures.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2017
  2. 2.
    Edenhofer O (2014) Technical summary. In: Edenhofer (ed) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    El Bassam N (2010) Handbook of bioenergy crops: a complete reference to species, development and applications. Earthscan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Bioplastics (2017) Industrial use of agricultural feedstock, position paper; http://docs.european-bioplastics.org/2016/publications/pp/EUBP_pp_feedstock_availability.pdf
  5. 5.
    European Bioplastics (2015) Bio-based building blocks and polymers in the world – capacities, production and applications: status quo and trends towards 2020. European Bioplastics Association.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farmer T, Mascal M (2015) Platform molecules. In: Clark J, Deswarte F (eds) Introduction to chemicals from biomass, Wiley series in renewable resources, 2nd edn. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 89–155Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FAO (2014) Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frost JW, Lievense J (1994) Prospects for biocatalytic synthesis of aromatics in the 21st century. New J Chem 18:341–348Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    International POPS Elimination Network (IPEN) (2017) Comments to UN Environment Assembly resolution 2/7 on green chemistry and sustainable chemistry. http://ipen.org/news/ipen-comments-green-chemistry-and-sustainable-chemistry. Accessed 14 July 2017
  10. 10.
    Lane J (2015) The DOE’s 12 Top biobased molecules – what became of them. In: BioFuels Digest. www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2015/04/30/the-does-12-top-biobased-molecules-what-became-of-them. Accessed 14 July 2017
  11. 11.
    Lane J (2017) The biobased economy: measuring growth and impacts. BioFuels Digest. http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2017/02/28/the-biobased-economy-measuring-growth-and-impacts/. Accessed 14 July 2017
  12. 12.
    Müssig J, Slootmaker T (2010) Types of fibers. In: Müssig J (ed) Industrial applications of natural fibers. Wiley, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009) The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2011) Future prospects for industrial biotechnology. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plant Resources of Tropical Africa Online (2017) PROTA4U database available at www.prota4u.org. Accessed 14 July 2017
  16. 16.
    Philp J, Ritchie R, Allan J, OECD Science and Technology Policy Division, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, and Genome British Columbia (2013) Biobased chemicals: the convergence of green chemistry with industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 31(4):219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh B (2010) Overview of industrial crops. In: Singh B (ed) Industrial crops and uses. CAB, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith P et al (2014) Agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer (ed) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Theilen M (2012) Bioplastics: basics, applications, markets. Polymedia Publishers, MönchengladbachGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toensmeier E (2016) The carbon farming solution: a global toolkit of perennial crops and regenerative agriculture practices for climate change mitigation and food security. Chelsea Green, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Turley D (2008) The chemical value of biomass. In: Clark J, Deswarte F (eds) Introduction to chemicals from biomass. Wiley Press, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    US Department of Agriculture (2008) US biobased products market potential and projections through 2025. OCE-2008-01. USDAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    US Department of Energy (2004) Top value added chemicals from biomass volume 1: results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas, p 10. US DOEGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    US Department of Energy (2007) Top value added chemicals from biomass volume 2: results of screening for potential candidates from biorefinery lignin. US DOEGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Economic Forum and Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017) The new plastics economy: rethinking the future of plastics. World Economic Forum/ Ellen MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flach, M. & Rumwas, F. (editors), 1996. Plant Resources of South-East Asia No. 9. Plants Yielding Non-Seed carbohydrates. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toensmeier, Eric, 2016. The Carbon Farming Solution: A Global Toolkit of Perennial Crops and Regenerative Agriculture Practices for Climate Change Mitigation and Food Security. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, Vermont.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Niemeyer, G & Tolman, R, 2012. 2012 World of Corn Statistics Book Metric Edition. National Corn Growers Association, Chesterfield Missouri.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale UniversityHolyokeUSA
  2. 2.Environmental and Public Health ConsultingAlamedaUSA

Personalised recommendations