Advertisement

Porous Nanomaterials for Heavy Metal Removal

  • Lin Zhi Lee
  • Muhammad Abbas Ahmad ZainiEmail author
  • Shu Hui Tang
Reference work entry

Abstract

Water pollution by heavy metals from industries is a serious environmental problem. The toxicity of heavy metals constitutes a great risk to the environment and human health. Due to the simplicity, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness of the remediation process, adsorption has been widely exercised in heavy metal wastewater treatment. Recent advances in nanotechnology offer considerable advantages in wastewater treatment via the introduction of porous nanomaterials, namely, metal oxide nanoparticles, carbon nanomaterials, and nanocomposites as adsorbents. This chapter highlights the current research trends on the applications of porous nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals. The advantages of using nanomaterials in the removal of heavy metals are highlighted. The discussion is then focused on the preparation techniques and characterization of nanomaterials, target heavy metals as the pollutant, factors affecting the adsorption, and the removal mechanisms.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhattacharya K, Parasar D, Mondal B, Ded P (2015) Mesoporous magnetic secondary nanostructures as versatile adsorbent for efficient scavenging of heavy metals. Sci Rep 5:17072.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olanipekun O, Oyefusi A, Neelgunf GM, Oki A (2014) Adsorption of lead over graphite oxide. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 118:857–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moazeni M, Ebrahimi A, Rafiei N, Pourzamani HR (2016) Removal of lead ions from aqueous solution by nano zero-valent iron (nZVI). Heath Scope.  https://doi.org/10.17795/jhealthscope-40240
  4. 4.
    Manjuladevi M, Oviyaa SM (2017) Heavy metal removal from industrial wastewater by nano adsorbent prepared from cucumis melopeel activated carbon. J Nanomed Res 5(1):00102.  https://doi.org/10.15406/jnmr.2017.05.0102
  5. 5.
    Yadav DK, Srivastava S (2017) Carbon nanotubes as adsorbent to remove heavy metal ion (Mn+7) in wastewater treatment. Mater Today 4:4089–4094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dargahi A, Golestanifar H, Darvishi P, Karami A, Hasan SH, Poormohammadi A, Behzadnia A (2016) An investigation and comparison of removing heavy metals (lead and chromium) from aqueous solutions using magnesium oxide nanoparticles. Pol J Environ Stud 25(2):557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poursani AS, Nilchi A, Hassani A, Shariat SM, Nouri J (2016) The synthesis of nano TiO2 and its use for removal of lead ions from aqueous solution. J Water Resour Prot 8:438–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou L, Huang Y, Qiu W, Sun Z, Liu Z, Song Z (2017) Adsorption properties of nano-MnO2–biochar composites for copper in aqueous solution. Molecules 22:173.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee LZ (2016) Adsorption of rhodamine B by metals chloride-activated castor bean residue carbon. Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lasheen MR, Iman YES, Shaimaa TEW, Dina YS, El-Shahat MF (2017) Heavy metals removal from aqueous solution using magnetite Dowex 50WX4 resin nanocomposite. J Mater Environ Sci 8(2):503–511Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Onundi YB, Mamun AA, Al Khatib MF, Al Saadi MA, Suleyman AM (2011) Heavy metals removal from synthetic wastewater by a novel nano-size composite adsorbent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(4):799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang X, Guo Y, Yang L, Ham M, Zhao J, Cheng X (2012) Nanomaterials as sorbents to remove heavy metal ions in wastewater treatment. J Environ Anal Toxicol 2(7):154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ray PC, Yu H, PP F (2009) Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: challenges and future needs. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27(1):1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta VK, Tyagi I, Sadegh H, Shahryari-Ghoshekandi R, Makhlouf ASH, Maazinejad B (2015) Nanoparticles as adsorbent; a positive approach for removal of noxious metal ions: a review. Sci Technol Dev 34(3):195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q (2012) Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: a review. J Hazard Mater 211–212:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruparelia JP, Duttagupta SP, Chatterjee AK, Mukherji S (2008) Potential of carbon nanomaterials for removal of heavy metals from water. Desalination 232(1–3):145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Varghese LR, Das N (2015) Application of nano-biocomposites for remediation of heavy metals from aqueous environment: an overview. Int J ChemTech Res 8(2):566–571Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dave PN, Chopda LV (2014) Application of iron oxide nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals. J Nanotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/398569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sheet I, Kabbani A, Holail H (2014) Removal of heavy metals using nanostructured graphite oxide, silica nanoparticles and silica/graphite oxide composite. Energy Procedia 50:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carlos L, Einschlag FSG, Gonzalez MC, Martire DO (2013) Application of magnetite nanoparticles for heavy metal removal from wastewater. In: Einschlag FSG, Carlos L (eds) Waste water – treatment technologies and recent analytical developments. InTech.  https://doi.org/10.5772/3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahmed NM, Yousef NS (2015) Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nano particles for the removal of Cr (VI). Int J Sci Eng Res 6(7):1235–1243Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taman R, Ossman ME, Mansour MS, Farag HA (2015) Metal oxide nano-particles as an adsorbent for removal of heavy metals. J Adv Chem Eng 5(3):125–132Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Youssef AM, Malhat FM (2014) Selective removal of heavy metals from drinking water using titanium dioxide nanowire. Macromol Symp 337:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Song K, Kim W, Suh CY, Shin D, Ko KS, Ha K (2013) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by electrical wire explosion for arsenic removal. Powder Technol 246:572–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar M (2011) Carbon nanotube synthesis and growth mechanism, In: Yellampalli S (Ed.) Carbon nanotubes - Synthesis, characterization, applications. InTech. DOI: 10.5772/19331Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alam SN, Sharma N, Kumar L (2017) Synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) by modified hummers method and its thermal reduction to obtain reduced graphene oxide (rGO). Graphene 6:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zaaba NI, Foo KL, Hashim U, Tan SJ, Liu WW, Voon CH (2017) Synthesis of graphene oxide using modified hummers method: solvent influence. Procedia Eng 184:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang W, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2011) Arsenic (III,V) removal from aqueous solution by ultrafine-Fe2O3 nanoparticles synthesized from solvent thermal method. J Hazard Mater 192:131–138Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lin S, Lu D, Liu Z (2012) Removal of arsenic contaminants with magnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 211–212:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luther S, Borgfeld N, Kim J, Parsons JG (2012) Removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: a study of the effects of ph and interfering ions using iron oxide nanomaterials. Microchem J 101:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kilianova M, Prucek R, Filip J, Kolarik J, Kvitek L, Panacek A, Tucek J, Zboril R (2013) Remarkable efficiency of ultrafine superparamagnetic iron(III) oxide nanoparticles toward arsenate removal from aqueous environment. Chemosphere 93:2690–2697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma X, Yang ST, Tang H, Liu Y, Wang H (2015) Competitive adsorption of heavy metal ions on carbon nanotubes and the desorption in simulated biofluids. J Colloid Interface Sci 448:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang Q, Jiao T (2013) Polymer-supported organic-inorganic nanomaterials: fabrication, characterization and environmental application. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) Materials and processes for energy: communicating current research and technological developments. Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, pp 903–912Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009) National primary drinking water regulations. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations. Accessed 19 July 2017
  35. 35.
    WHO World Health Organization (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: incorporating first addendum, vol 1, recommendations, 3rd edn. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/gdwq0506.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
  36. 36.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Mercury MSDS. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927224. Accessed 19 July 2017
  37. 37.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Cadmium MSDS. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9923223. Accessed 19 July 2017
  38. 38.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Arsenic MSDS. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9922970. Accessed 19 July 2017
  39. 39.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Chromium MSDS. https://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927136. Accessed 19 July 2017
  40. 40.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Lead MSDS. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927204. Accessed 19 July 2017
  41. 41.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Nickel MSDS. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927372. Accessed 19 July 2017
  42. 42.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Copper MSDS. https://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9923549. Accessed 19 July 2017
  43. 43.
    ScienceLab.com (2013) Zinc MSDS. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9925476. Accessed 19 July 2017
  44. 44.
    Shannon RD (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomie distances in halides and chaleogenides. Acta Crystallogr A32(5):751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silva RHS, Virginia S, Granados LD, Manuel SJ (2010) Adsorption of mercury (II) from liquid solutions using modified activated carbons. J Mater Res 13(2):129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arias FEA, Beneduci A, Chidichimo F, Furia E, Straface S (2017) Study of the adsorption of mercury (II) on lignocellulosic materials under static and dynamic conditions. Chemosphere 180:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kumar R, Chawla J (2014) Removal of cadmium ion from water/wastewater by nano-metal oxides: a review. Water Qual Expo Health 5:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muthulakshmi AN, Anuradha J (2015) Removal of cadmium ions from water/waste water using chitosan – a review. Res Rev J Ecol Environ Sci S1:9–14Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nithya R, Sudha PN (2016) Removal of heavy metals from tannery effluent using chitosan-g-poly(butyl acrylate)/bentonite nanocomposite as an adsorbent. Textiles Clothing Sustain 2(7).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40689-016-0018-1
  50. 50.
    Ebadi M, Shagholani H, Jahangiri H (2016) High efficient nanocomposite for removal of heavy metals (Hg2+ and Pb2+) from aqueous solution. J Nanostruct 6(1):23–27Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zenasni MA, Benfarhi S, Merlin A, Molina S, George B, Meroufel B (2013) Adsorption of nickel in aqueous solution onto natural maghnite. Mater Sci Appl 4:153–161Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lakherwal D, Rattan VK, Singh HP (2016) Studies on adsorption of nickel by activated carbon in a liquid fluidised bed reactor. Can Chem Trans 4(1):121–132Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang X, Wang X (2015) Adsorption and desorption of nickel(ii) ions from aqueous solution by a lignocellulose/montmorillonite nanocomposite. PLoS One 10(2):1–21Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Solomon F (2009) Impacts of copper on aquatic ecosystems and human health. http://www.ushydrotech.com/files/6714/1409/9604/Impacts_of_Copper_on_Aquatic_Ecosystems_and_human_Health.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
  55. 55.
    Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Benzaoui T, Selatnia A, Diabali D (2017) Adsorption of copper (II) ions from aqueous solution using bottom ash of expired drugs incineration. Adsorpt Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617416685099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sen TK, Khoo C (2013) Adsorption characteristics of zinc (Zn2+) from aqueous solution by natural bentonite and kaolin clay minerals: a comparative study. Comp Water Energy Environ Eng 2:1–6Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kounou GN, Nsami JN, Belibi DPB, Kouotou D, Tagne GM, Joh DDD, Mbadcam JK (2015) Adsorption of zinc(II) ions from aqueous solution onto kaolinite and metakaolinite. Der Pharma Chemica 7(3):51–58Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Levenson R (2001) More modern chemical techniques. The Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Radulescu C, Dulama ID, Stihi C, Ionita I, Chilian A, Necula C, Chelarescu ED (2014) Determination of heavy metal levels in water and therapeutic mud by atomic absorption spectrometry. Rom J Phys 59(9–10):1057–1066Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wolf RE (2005) What is ICP-MS? … and more importantly, what can it do? https://crustal.usgs.gov/laboratories/icpms/What_is_ICPMS.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
  62. 62.
    Velez G (2009) Inductively coupled plasma: the future of heavy metals testing. http://www.sgs.co.ao/~/media/Global/Documents/Technical%20Documents/sgs-regulatory-heavy%20metals-en-09.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
  63. 63.
    Russo RE, Mao XL, Liu HC, Yoo JH, Mao SS (1999) Time-resolved plasma diagnostics and mass removal during single-pulse laser ablation. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 69(1):S887–S894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ali S, Jamil H, Imran M (2014) Measuring heavy metals content in wastewater using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Int Lett Chem Phys Astron 2:69–75Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Holmberg JP (2006) Competitive adsorption and displacement behavior of heavy metals on peat. Dissertation, Chalmes University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Flores-Cano JV, Leyva-Ramos R, Padilla-Ortega E, Mendoza-Barron J (2013) Adsorption of heavy metals on diatomite: mechanism and effect of operating variables. Adsorpt Sci Technol 31(2/3):275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lu H, Zhang W, Yang Y, Huang X, Qiu R (2011) Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. Water Res 46(3):854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Al-Saad KA, Amr MA, Hadi DT, Arar RS, Al-Sulaiti MM, Abdulmalik TA, Alsahamary NM, Kwak JC (2012) Iron oxide nanoparticles: applicability for heavy metal removal from contaminated water. Arab J Nucl Sci Appl 45(2):335–346Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Zhi Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Muhammad Abbas Ahmad Zaini
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shu Hui Tang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre of Lipids Engineering and Applied Research (CLEAR), Ibnu-Sina Institute for Scientific and Industrial ResearchUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Chemical and Energy EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations