Advertisement

Cement-Bonded Lignocellulosic Panel (CLP): A Promising Environmental Friendly Construction Material for Conservation of Forest Resources

  • Md Rafikul Islam
  • Fatima Rahman
  • Md Nazrul IslamEmail author
  • Md Nasim Rana
  • Suresh Kumar Nath
  • Md Ashaduzzaman
  • Md Iftekhar Shams
Reference work entry

Abstract

Production of environmental friendly cement-bonded panels (CBPs) for internal and external purposes from lignocellulosic materials has come under limelight as a consequence of the demand for environmental friendly high strength construction materials. Moreover, environmental concern about the disposal of waste materials, their low cost, and availability has renewed attention on quality CBPs. This book chapter provides an overview on development of cement-bonded panels using assorted range of lignocellulosic materials. Different manufacturing parameters of CBPs such as pressing temperature and pressure, curing time, particle size, mixing ratio, and additives are discussed in this chapter. In addition, the physical, mechanical, and biological properties along with the availability of raw materials for different type of CBPs are also reported. The environmental friendly cement-bonded panels not only provide a solution for lowering environmental pollution but also ensure sustainable use of natural resources and thus, results in high strength construction materials.

Keywords

Lignocellulosic panel Wood-cement composites Reinforcement material Fiber cement board Wood wool cement board Cement bonded particle board Wood strand cement board 

References

  1. 1.
    Moslemi AA (1989) Fiber and particleboards bonded with inorganic binders: international conference: Papers, Forest Products Research SocietyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolfe RW, Gjinolli A (1999) Durability and strength of cement-bonded wood particle composites made from construction waste. For Prod J 49(2):24Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Elten I.N.G.E.J.B. (2006) Cement bonded particle board (cbpb) and wood strand cement board (eltoboard): production, properties and applications, in 10th inter. In: Inorganic bonded fiber composites conference (IIBCC), Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pereira C, Jorge FC, Irle M, Ferreira JM (2006) Characterizing the setting of cement when mixed with cork, blue gum, or maritime pine, grown in Portugal I: temperature profiles and compatibility indices. J Wood Sci 52(4):311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soroushian P, Won J-P, Chowdhury H, Nossoni A (2003) Development of accelerated processing techniques for cement-bonded wood particleboard. Cem Concr Compos 25(7):721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aggarwal LK, Agrawal SP, Thapliyal PC, Karade SR (2008) Cement-bonded composite boards with arhar stalks. Cem Concr Compos 30(1):44–51. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ashori A, Tabarsa T, Azizi K, Mirzabeygi R (2011) Wood–wool cement board using mixture of eucalypt and poplar. Ind Crop Prod 34(1):1146–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faria G, Chastre C, Lúcio V, Nunes  (2013) Compression behaviour of short columns made from cement-bonded particle board. Constr Build Mater 40:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karade SR (2010) Cement-bonded composites from lignocellulosic wastes. Constr Build Mater 24(8):1323–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salehuddin ABM (1992) Wood and fibre composite materialsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Youngquist JA (1999) Panel products, Chapter 10, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saunders A, Davidson E (2014) Cement boards 101Global Cement Magazine, vol 32. Retrieved from www.globalcement.com
  13. 13.
    Van Elten GJ (2013, May 22) Wood strand cement boards with a practically closed surface and production process, Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andrade A, Caldeira F (2010) Assessment of the compatibility of wood and plastic with cement for their recycling in cement composites. Revista da Ciência e Tecnologia, pp 66:58–66Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jorge FC, Pereira C, Ferreira JMF (2004) Wood-cement composites: a review. Holz Als Roh-Und Werkstoff 62(5):370–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moslemi AA, Garcia JF, Hofstrand AD (1983) An evaluation of the rate of heat evolution of portland cement-northern Rocky Mountain species. Wood Fiber Sci 15(2):164–176Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thygesen A, Daniel G, Lilholt H, Thomsen AB (2006) Hemp fiber microstructure and use of fungal defibration to obtain fibers for composite materials. J Nat Fibers 2(4):19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Semple KE, Evans PD (2004) Wood-cement composites: suitability of Western Australian Mallee Eucalypt, Blue Gum and Melaleucas: a report for the RIRDC/Land & Water Australia/FWPRDC/MDBC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program, RIRDCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okino EYA, de Souza MR, Santana MAE, Alves MV d S, de Sousa ME, Teixeira DE (2005) Physico-mechanical properties and decay resistance of Cupressus spp. cement-bonded particleboards. Cem Concr Compos 27(3):333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miyatake A, Fujii T, Hiramatsu Y, Abe H, Tonosaki M (2002) Manufacture of wood strand-cement composite for structural use. In: Aciar proceedings, ACIAR, 1998Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chow P, Harp TL, Meimban R, Youngquist JA, Rowell RM (1994) Biodegradation of acetylated southern pine and aspen composition board. The IRG/WP 94–40020, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karade SR, Irle M, Maher K (2003) Assessment of wood-cement compatibility: a new approach. Holzforschung 57:672–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Markessini E, Roffael E, Rigal L (1997) Panels from annual plant fibers bonded with urea-formaldehyde resins. In: Proceedings of the 31th international particleboard/composite materials symposium, Pullman, Washington, pp 147–160Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moslemi AA, Pfister SC (1987) The influence of cement-wood ratio and cement type on bending strength and dimensional stability of wood-cement composite panels. Wood Fiber Sci 19(2):165–175Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rowell RM (1992) Opportunity for lignocellulosic materials and composites. In: Emerging technologies for materials and chemicals from biomass. ACS symposium series 476. American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sandermann W, Brendel M (1956) Studies on inorganic-bonded wood materials – part 2: the cement poisoning effect of constituents of wood and their dependence on the chemical composition. Holz Roh Werkst 14(8):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md Rafikul Islam
    • 1
  • Fatima Rahman
    • 1
  • Md Nazrul Islam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Md Nasim Rana
    • 1
  • Suresh Kumar Nath
    • 1
  • Md Ashaduzzaman
    • 1
  • Md Iftekhar Shams
    • 1
  1. 1.Forestry and Wood Technology DisciplineKhulna UniversityKhulnaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations