Advertisement

Multifunctional Composite Ecomaterials and Their Impact on Sustainability

  • Sebastian Jurczyk
  • Piotr Kurcok
  • Marta MusiołEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Composites composed of biodegradable polymer as matrix and natural fillers as reinforcement have attracted great attention in environmental protection. The addition of natural fillers to the compositions with the biodegradable polymers aims to improve the properties of the materials, as well as lower the prices. Many application fields in which this kind of composites may be used caused the development of a new trend in ecomaterials area. Although consumers more and more expect ecoproducts, the introduction of biodegradable composites packaging on market involves many scientific uncertainties and still requires complex activities to the full understanding of the use of such materials in daily life. This review focuses on compostable composites as a cheaper alternative for the biodegradable polymers in various practical applications. Composites with biodegradable polymers as a matrix and the natural origin materials as fillers will be briefly discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland (NCN SONATA 11 project no. 2016/21/D/ST8/01993, “Multifaceted studies on the (bio)degradability profile of composites of selected biodegradable polymers with natural fillers and bacteriocins”).

References

  1. 1.
    Standard EN 13432:2000 Packaging – requirements for packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation – test scheme and evaluation criteria for the final acceptance of packaging (2000) European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peijs T, Garkhail SK, Heijenrath R, Van Den Oever M, Bos H (1998) Thermoplastic composites based on flax fibres and polypropylene: influence of fibre length and fibre volume fraction on mechanical properties. Macromol Symp 127:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barkoula NM, Garkhail SK, Peijs T (2010) Biodegradable composites based on flax/polyhydroxybutyrate and its copolymer with hydroxyvalerate. Ind Crop Prod 31:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mukherjee T, Kao N (2011) PLA based biopolymer reinforced with natural fibre: a review. J Polym Environ 19:714–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karani R, Krishnan M, Narayan R (1997) Biofiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Polym Eng Sci 37:476–483.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.11691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 276/277:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-WCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M (1995) Studies on jute composites – a literature review. Polym Plast Technol Eng 34:729–792.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559508009599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bledzki AK, Reihmane S, Gassan J (1996) Properties and modification methods for vegetable fibers for natural fiber composites. J Appl Polym Sci 59:1329–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960222)59:8<1329::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maya JJ, Sabu T (2008) Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71:343–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li H, Zadorecki P, Flodin P (1987) Cellulose fiber-polyester composites with reduced water sensitivity (1) – chemical treatment and mechanical properties. Polym Compos 8:199–207.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750080308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paillet M, Peguy A (1990) New biodegradable films from exploded wood solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 40:427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1990.070400311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tejado A, Pena C, Labidi J, Echeverria JM, Mondragon I (2007) Physico-chemical characterization of lignins from different sources for use in phenol–formaldehyde resin synthesis. Bioresour Technol 98:1655–1663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeronian SH, Kawabata H, Alger W (1990) Factors affecting the tensile properties of nonmercerized and mercerized cotton fibers. Text Res J 60:179–183.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759006000310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jayarman K (2003) Manufacturing sisal–polypropylene composites with minimum fibre degradation. Compos Sci Technol 63:367–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00217-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y, Yang GCh, Zeng HM (2001) The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 61:1437–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24:221–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baillie C (ed) (2004) Green composites: polymer composites and the environment. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park J, Quang ST, Hwang B, DeVries LK (2006) Interfacial evaluation of modified Jute and Hemp fibers/polypropylene (PP)-maleic anhydride polypropylene copolymers (PP-MAPP) composites using micromechanical technique and nondestructive acoustic emission. Compos Sci Technol 66:2686–2699.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interfaces 8:313–343.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156855401753255422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zakaria S, Poh LK (2002) Polystyrene-benzoylated EFB reinforced composites. Plast Technol 41:951–962.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PPT-120014397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alvarez VA, Ruseckaite RA, Vazquez A (2003) Mechanical properties and water absorption behavior of composites made from a biodegradable matrix and alkaline-treated sisal fibers. J Compos Mater 37:1575–1588.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998303035180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Agrawal R, Saxena NS, Sharma KB, Thomas S, Sreekala MS (2000) Activation energy and crystallization kinetics of untreated and treated oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Mater Sci Eng A 277:77–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00556-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edeerozey AMM, Akil HM, Azhar AB, Ariffin MIZ (2007) Chemical modification of kenaf fibers. Mater Lett 61:2023–2025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar AP, Singh RP, Sarwade BD (2005) Degradability of composites, prepared from ethylene–propylene copolymer and jute fiber under accelerated aging and biotic environments. Mater Chem Phys 92:458–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.01.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gomes A, Matsuo T, Goda K, Ohgi J (2007) Development and effect of alkali treatment on tensile properties of curaua fiber green composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci 38:1811–1820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kostic M, Pejic B, Skundric P (2008) Quality of chemically modified hemp fibers. Bioresour Technol 99:94–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Joseph PV, Joseph K, Thomas S, Pillai CKS, Prasad VS, Groennick G (2003) The thermal and crystallization studies of short sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci 34:253–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00185-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang B, Panigrahi S, Tabil L, Crerar W (2007) Pre-treatment of flax fibers for use in rotationally molded biocomposites. J Reinf Plast Compos 26:447–463.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684406072526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prasad SV, Pavithran C, Rohatgi PK (1983) Alkali treatment of coir fibres for coir-polyester composites. J Mater Sci 18:1443–1454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01111964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ray D, Sarkar BK, Rana AK, Bose NR (2001) Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. Bull Mater Sci 24:129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sreekala MS, Kumaran MG, Thomas S (1997) Oil palm fibers: morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 66:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999) Chemical modification of henequen fibres with an organosilane coupling agent. Compos Part B Eng 30:321–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00055-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sever K, Sakanat M, Seki Y, Erkan G, Erdogan UH (2010) The mechanical properties of γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane-treated jute/polyester composites. J Compos Mater 44:1913–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998309360939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Seki Y (2009) Innovative multifunctional siloxane treatment of jute fibre surface and its effect on the mechanical properties of jute/thermoset composites. Mater Sci Eng A 508:247–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hill CAS, Khalil HPSA, Hale MD (1998) A study of the potential of acetylation to improve the properties of plant fibres. Ind Crop Prod 8:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(97)10012-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (1999) The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok fibres for composite reinforcement. Macromol Mater Eng 272:108–116.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19991201)272:1<108::AID-APMC108>3.0.CO;2-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Lucka-Gabor M, Gutowski VS (2008) The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and polypropylene composites. Express Polym Lett 2:413–422.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paul S, Puja N, Rajive G (2003) PhCOCl-Py/basic alumina as a versatile reagent for benzoylation in solvent-free conditions. Molecules 8:374–380.  https://doi.org/10.3390/80400374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sreekumar PA, Thomas SP, Marc Saiter J, Joseph K, Unnikrishnan G, Thomas S (2009) Effect of fiber surface modification on the mechanical and water absorption characteristics of sisal/polyester composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Compos Part A Appl Sci 40:1777–1784.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mishra S, Mishra M, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, Mohanty AK (2001) Graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile on chemically modified sisal fibers. Macromol Mater Eng 286:107–113.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1439-2054(20010201)286:2<107:AID-MAME107>3.0.CO;2-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Paul A, Joseph K, Thomas S (1997) Effect of surface treatments on the electrical properties of low-density polyethylene composites reinforced with short sisal fibers. Compos Sci Technol 57:67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00109-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joseph K, Thomas S (1996) Effect of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced polyethylene composites. Polymer 37:5139–5149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)00144-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sapieha S, Alard P, Zang YH (1990) Dicumyl peroxide-modified cellulose/LLDPE composites. J Appl Polym Sci 41:2039–2048.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1990.070410910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zafeiropoulos NE, Williams DR, Baillie CA, Matthews FL (2002) Engineering and characterization of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part I. Development and investigation of surface treatments. Compos Part A Appl Sci 33:1083–1093.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00082-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Corrales F, Vilaseca F, Llop M, Gironès J, Méndez JA, Mutjè P (2007) Chemical modification of jute fibers for the production of green-composites. J Hazard Mater 144:730–735.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Paul SA, Oommen C, Joseph K, Mathew G, Thomas S (2010) The role of interface modification on thermal degradation and crystallization behavior of composites from commingled polypropylene fiber and banana fiber. Polym Compos 31:1113–1123.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    George J, Sreekala MS, Thomas S (2001) A review of interface modification and characterization of natural fibre reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci 41:1471–1485.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Verma SK, Tripathy SS (2004) Effect of MAPP as a coupling agent on the performance of jute-PP composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 23:625–637.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684404032868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kaliaa S, Kaith BS, Kaur L (2009) Pretreatments of natural fibres and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites – a review. Polym Eng Sci 49:1253–1272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rahman MM, Mallik AK, Khan MA (2007) Influences of various surface pretreatments on the mechanical and degradable properties of photografted oil palm fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 105:3077–3086.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sinha E, Panigrahi S (2009) Effect of plasma treatment on structure, wettability of jute fiber and flexural strength of its composites. J Compos Mater 43:1791–1802.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998309338078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Belgacem MN, Bataille P, Sapieha S (1994) Effect of corona modification on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/cellulose composites. J Appl Polym Sci 53:379–385.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1994.070530401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ji SG, Park WH, Cho D, Lee BC (2010) Electron beam effect on the tensile properties and topology of jute fibers and the interfacial strength of jute-PLA green composites. Macromol Res 18:919–922.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-010-0916-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mukhopadhyay S, Fangueiro R (2009) Physical modification of natural fibers and thermoplastic films for composites – a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 22:135–162.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705708091860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cho D, Seo JM, Min J, Park WH, Han SK, Hwang TW, Choi CH, Jung SJ (2007) Improvement of the interfacial, flexural, and thermal properties of jute/poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by fiber surface treatments. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 1:331–340.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2007.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gil L (2009) Cork composites: a review. Materials 2:776–789.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2030776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gibson LJ, Easterling KE, Ashby MF (1981) The structure and mechanics of cork. Proc R Soc Lond A 377:99–117.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1981.0117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Silva SP, Sabino MA, Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Boesel LF, Reis RL (2005) Cork: properties, capabilities and applications. Int Mater Rev 50:345–365.  https://doi.org/10.1179/174328005X41168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gil L (1997) Cork powder waste: an overview. Biomass Bioenergy 13:59–61.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2030776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Abdallah FB, Cheikh RB, Baklouti M, Denchev Z, Cunha AM (2006) Characterization of composite materials based on PP-cork blends. J Reinf Plast Compos 25:1499–1506.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684406066745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Abdallah FB, Cheikh RB, Baklouti M, Denchev Z, Cunha AM (2010) Effect of surface treatment in cork reinforced composites. J Polym Res 17:519–528.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-009-9339-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Chagas JAM, Mano JF, Reis RL (2010) Cork based composites using polyolefin’s as matrix: morphology and mechanical performance. Compos Sci Technol 70:2310–2318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Chagas JAM, Mano JF, Reis RL (2011) Properties of new cork–polymer composites: advantages and drawbacks as compared with commercially available fibreboard materials. Compos Struct 93:3120–3129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Pascoal Neto C, Gandini A, Martin L, Mondragon I (2008) Composites based on acylated cellulose fibers and low-density polyethylene: effect of the fiber content, degree of substitution and fatty acid chain length on final properties. Compos Sci Technol 68:3358–3364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Choubisa B, Patel M, Dholakiya B (2013) Synthesis and characterization of polylactic acid (PLA) using a solid acid catalyst system in the polycondensation method. Res Chem Intermed 39:3063–3070.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-012-0819-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Guan Q, Naguib HE (2014) Fabrication and characterization of PLA/PHBV-chitin nanocomposites and their foams. J Polym Environ 22:119–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-013-0625-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bartczak Z, Galeski A, Kowalczuk M, Sobota M, Malinowski R (2013) Tough blends of poly(lactide) and amorphous poly([R,S]- 3-hydroxy butyrate) – morphology and properties. Eur Polym J 49:3630–3641.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.07.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of poly(lactic acid). J Polym Environ 9:63–84.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020200822435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rasal RM, Janorkar AV, Hirt DE (2010) Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci 35:338–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sudesh K, Iwata T (2008) Sustainability of biobased and biodegradable plastics. Clean Soil Air Water 36:433–442.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200700183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gandini A (2008) Polymers from renewable resources: a challenge for the future of macromolecular materials. Macromolecules 41:9491–9504.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma801735uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Koller M, Salerno A, Dias M, Reiterer A, Braunegg G (2010) Modern biotechnological polymer synthesis: a review. Food Technol Biotechnol 48:255–269Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rutkowska M, Krasowska K, Heimowska A, Adamus G, Sobota M, Musioł M, Janeczek H, Sikorska W, Krzan A, Zagar E, Kowalczuk M (2008) Environmental degradation of blends of atactic poly[(R,S)-3-hydroxybutyrate] with natural PHBV in Baltic Sea water and compost with activated sludge. J Polym Environ 16:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0100-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Rydz J, Wolna-Stypka K, Adamus G, Janeczek H, Musioł M, Sobota M, Marcinkowski A, Krzan A, Kowalczuk M (2015) Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. Part 1 – degradation studies of polylactide blends with atactic poly[(R,S)-3-hydroxybutyrate] in paraffin. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29:247–259.  https://doi.org/10.15255/CABEQ.2014.2258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW (2010) The return of a forgotten polymer – polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 35:1217–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Liu JY, Reni L, Wei Q, Wu JL, Liu S, Wang YJ, Li GY (2006) Fabrication and characterization of polycaprolactone/calcium sulphate whisker composites. Express Polym Lett 5:742–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Reis EF, Campos FS, Lage AP, Leite RC, Heneine LG, Vasconcelos WL, Lobato ZIP, Mnsur HS (2006) Synthesis and characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels and hybrids for rMPB70 protein adsorption. Mater Res 9:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Xie Y, Hill CAS, Xiao Z, Militz H, Mai C (2010) Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci 41:806–819.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I (2003) Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos Sci Technol 63:1259–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Dooley J, Hyun KS, Hughes K (1998) An experimental study on the effect of polymer viscoelasticity on layer rearrangement in coextruded structures. Polym Eng Sci 38:1060–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gatenholm P, Kubat J, Mathiasson A (1992) Biodegradable natural composites. I. Processing and properties. J Appl Polym Sci 45:1667–1677.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1992.070450918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kuciel S, Liber-Kneć A (2011) Biocomposites based on PHB filled with wood or kenaf fibers. Polimery 56:218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gunning MA, Geever LM, Killion JA, Lyons JG, Higginbotham CG (2013) Mechanical and biodegradation performance of short natural fibre polyhydroxybutyrate composites. Polym Test 32:1603–1611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wong S, Shanks R, Hodzic A (2002) Properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid) composites with flax fibres modified by plasticiser absorption. Macromol Mater Eng 287:647–655.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1439-2054(200210)287:10<647::AID-MAME647>3.0.CO;2-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Berthet MA, Angellier-Coussy H, Chea V, Guillard V, Gastaldi E, Gontard N (2015) Sustainable food packaging: valorising wheat straw fibres for tuning PHBV-based composites properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci 72:139–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Berthet MA, Angellier-Coussy H, Machado D, Hilliou L, Staebler A, Vincente A, Gontard N (2015) Exploring the potentialities of using lignocellulosic fibres derived from three food by-products as constituents of biocomposites for food packaging. Ind Crop Prod 69:110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Luo S, Netravali N (1999) Mechanical and thermal properties of environment-friendly “green” composites made from pineapple leaf fibers and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) resin. Polym Compos 20:367–378.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Singh S, Mohanty AK (2007) Wood fiber reinforced bacterial bioplastic composites: fabrication and performance evaluation. Compos Sci Technol 67:1753–1763.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wong S, Shanks R, Hodzic A (2003) Interfacial improvements in poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-flax fibre composites with hydrogen bonding additives. Compos Sci Technol 64:1321–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Cunha M, Berthet MA, Pereira R, Hilliou L, Covas JA, Vincente AA (2015) Development of polyhydroxyalkanoate/beer spent grain fibers composites for film blowing applications. Polym Compos 36:1859–1865.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Singh S, Mohanty AK, Sugie T, Takai Y, Hamada H (2008) Renewable resource based biocomposites from natural fiber and polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate (PHBV) bioplastic. Compos Part A Appl Sci 39:875–886.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sani M (2014) Progress report on natural fiber reinforced composites. Macromol Mater Eng 299:9–26.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201300008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lee BH, Kim HS, Lee S, Kim HJ, Dorgan JR (2009) Bio-composites of kenaf fibers in polylactide: role of improved interfacial adhesion in the carding process. Compos Sci Technol 69:2573–2579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Daves G (ed) (2003) Materials for automobile bodies. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Koronis G, Silva A, Fontul M (2013) Green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos Part B Eng 44:120–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal TL, Selke SE, Harte BR, Hinrichsen G (2005) Natural fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites: an introduction. In: Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal TL (eds) Natural fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites. CRC Press/Taylor & Francais Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Stewart R (2010) Automotive composites offer lighter solutions. Reinf Plast 54:22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-3617(10)70061-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Barrett JSF, Abdala AA, Srienc F (2014) Poly(hydroxyalkanoate) elastomers and their graphene nanocomposites. Macromolecules 47:3926–3941.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma500022xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kampik M, Domański W, Grzenik M, Majchrzyk K, Musioł K, Tokarski J (2014) Optimization of measurement conditions in laboratory of AD-DC standards (in Polish). PAK 2:73–76Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Fernandes EG, Pietrini M, Chiellini M (2004) Bio-based polymeric composites comprising wood flour as filler. Biomacromolecules 5:1200–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034507oCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ren H, Liu Z, Zhai H, Cao Y, Omori S (2015) Effects of lignophenols on mechanical performance of biocomposites based on polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polypropylene (PP) reinforced with pulp fibers. BioResources 10:432–447.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.1.432-447Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Melo JDD, Carvalho LFM, Medeiros AM, Souto CRO, Paskocimas CA (2012) A biodegradable composite material based on polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and carnauba fibers. Compos Part B Eng 43:2827–2835.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Alberti LD, Souza OF, Bucci DZ, Barcellos IO (2014) Study on physical and mechanical properties of PHB biocomposites with rice hull ash. Mater Sci Forum 775–776:557–561.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.775-776.557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Reinsch VE, Kelley SS (1997) Crystallization of poly(hydroxybutrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) in wood fiber-reinforced composites. J Appl Polym Sci 64:1785–1796.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970531)64:9<1785::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Dufresne A, Dupeyre D, Paillet M (2003) Lignocellulosic flour-reinforced poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) composites. J Appl Polym Sci 87:1302–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Błędzki AK, Jaszkiewicz A (2010) Mechanical performance of biocomposites based on PLA and PHBV reinforced with natural fibres – a comparative study to PP. Compos Sci Technol 70:1687–1696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Shibata M, Takachiyo KI, Ozawa K, Yosomiya R, Takeishi H (2002) Biodegradable polyester composites reinforced with short abaca fiber. Compos Part A Appl Sci 85:129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ahnkari SS, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2011) Mechanical behaviour of agro-residue reinforced poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), (PHBV) green composites: a comparison with traditional polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 71:653–657.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech2011.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Baiardo M, Zini E, Scandola M (2004) Flax fibre–polyester composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci 35:703–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wollerdorfer WM, Bader H (1998) Influence of natural fibres on the mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers. Ind Crop Prod 8:105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(97)10015-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Javadi A, Srithep Y, Pilla S, Lee J, Gong S, Turng LS (2010) Processing and characterization of solid and microcellular PHBV/coir fiber composites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater 30:749–757.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Lu H, Madbouly SA, Schrader JA, Srinivasan G, McCabe KG, Grewell D, Kessler MR, Graves WR (2014) Biodegradation behavior of poly(lactic acid)(PLA)/distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS) composites. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:2699–2706.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500440qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Michel AT, Billington SL (2012) Characterization of poly-hydroxybutyrate films and hemp fiber reinforced composites exposed to accelerated weathering. Polym Degrad Stab 97:870–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Hidayat A, Tachibana S (2012) Characterization of polylactic acid (PLA)/kenaf composie degradation immobilized mycelia of Pleurotus ostreatus. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 71:50–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Serizawa S, Inoue K, Iji M (2006) Kenaf-fiber-reinforced poly(lactc acid) used for electronic product. J Appl Polym Sci 1:618–624.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kwon H, Sunthornvarabhas J, Park J, Lee K, Kim H, Piyachomkwan K, Sriroth K, Cho D (2014) Tensile properties of kenaf fiber and cork husk flour reiforced poly(lacic acid) hybrid bio-composites: role of aspect ratio of natural fibers. Compos Part B 56:232–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Gupta N, Jain AK, Asokan P (2014) Mechanical characterization of fully bio-degradable jute fabric reinforced polylactic acid composites. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 4:111–113Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Vilela C, Sousa AF, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP (2013) Novel sustainable composites prepared from cork residues and biopolymers. Biomass Bioenergy 55:148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Mano JF, Rei RL (2015) Cork-polymer biocomposites: mechanical, structural and thermal properties. Mater Des 82:282–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Ren H, Zhang Y, Zhai H, Chen J (2015) Production and evaluation of biodegradable composites based on polyhydroxybutyrate and polylactic acid reinforced with short and long pulp fibres. Cellul Chem Technol 49:641–652Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Seggiani M, Cinelli P, Geicu M, Popa ME, Puccini M, Lazzeri A (2016) Microbiological valorisation of bio-composites based on polylactic acid and wood fibres. Chem Eng Trans 49:127–132.  https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1649022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Chaitanya S, Singh I (2016) Novel aloe vera fiber reinforced biodegradable composites – development and characterization. J Reinf Plast Compos 35(19):1411–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684416652739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Oksman K, Skrifvars M, Selin JF (2003) Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol 63(9):1317–1324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Musioł M, Janeczek H, Jurczyk S, Kwiecień I, Sobota M, Marcinkowski A, Rydz J (2015) (Bio)degradation studies of degradable polymer composites with jute in different environments. Fiber Polym 16:1362–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-1362-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Gunti R, Prasad R, Gupta AV (2016) Mechanical and degradation properties of natural fiber reinforced PLA composites: jute, sisal and elephant grass. Polym Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Petinakis E, Yu L, Edward G, Dean K, Liu H, Scully A (2009) Effect of matrix–particle interfacial adhesion on the mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/wood-flour micro-composites. J Polym Environ 17:83–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-009-0124-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Mathew AP, Oksman K, Sain M (2005) Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from poly lactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). J Appl Polym Sci 97:2014–2025.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Zhang Q, Shi L, Nie J, Wang H, Yang D (2012) Study on poly(lactic acid)/natural fibers composites. J Appl Polym Sci 125:E526–E533.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Nurul Fazita MR, Jayaraman K, Bhattacharyya D, Haafiz MKM, Saurabh CK, Hussin MH, Khalil A (2016) Green composites made of bamboo fabric and poly(lactic) acid for packaging applications – a review. Materials 435:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Tao Y, Yan L, Jie R (2009) Preparation and properties of short natural fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 3:s651–s655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60126-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Darwish LR, El-Wakad MT, Farag M, Emara M (2013) The use of starch matrix-banana fiber composites for biodegradable maxillofacial bone plates. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on biology, medical physics, medical chemistry, biochemistry and biomedical engineering (BIOMED), Venice, Italy. ISBN: 978-1-61804-213-2Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Avella M, De Vlieger JJ, Errico ME, Fischer S, Vacca P, Volpe MG (2005) Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem 93(3):467–474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Liu D, Ma Z, Wang Z, Tian H, Gu M (2014) Biodegradable poly(vinyl alcohol) foams supported by cellulose nanofibrils: processing, structure and properties. Langmuir 30:9544–9550.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la502723dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Laxmeshwar SS, Kumar DJM, Viveka S, Nagaraja GK (2012) Preparation and properties of biodegradable film composites using modified cellulose fibre-reinforced with PVA. ISRN Polym Sci 2012:Article ID 154314, 8 pages.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/154314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Huda MS, Yasui M, Mohri N, Fujimura T, Kimura T (2002) Dynamic mechanical properties of solution-cast poly(L-lactide) films. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop 333:98–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01834-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Ma H, Joo CW (2011) Invrestigation of jute-lignin-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) hybrid biodegradable composites with low water absorption. Fiber Polym 12:310–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-011-0310-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Jurczyk
    • 1
  • Piotr Kurcok
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marta Musioł
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Engineering of Polymer Materials and DyesToruńPoland
  2. 2.Centre of Polymer and Carbon MaterialsPolish Academy of SciencesZabrzePoland
  3. 3.Institute of Chemistry, Environment Protection and BiotechnologyJan Długosz University of CzęstochowaCzęstochowaPoland

Personalised recommendations