Advertisement

Eco-friendly Denim Processing

  • Aravin Prince PeriyasamyEmail author
  • Sunil Kumar Ramamoorthy
  • Saatish Siddappa Lavate
Reference work entry

Abstract

The denim sector is booming worldwide, because of the spread of denim culture. All over the world it has brought with it a trend of fast-changing fashion. Denim washing has emerged as one of the important production routes toward meeting the fast-changing demands of the fashion market. There are huge ecological concerns, as this sector is enormous. Approximately 1500 gallons of water is needed to produce 1.5 pounds of cotton to make one pair of jeans. If this continues, soon it will pose a serious problem to drinking water supplies. It is therefore important to study the environmental impact of denim and find alternative processes. This chapter starts by describing the different types of denim washing techniques. In addition, it discusses the environmental impact of denim dry and wet washing techniques, and the importance of environmentally friendly washing techniques. It also describes the latest denim finishing technologies, comparing their impacts on the environment with those of the classic techniques. Further, the environmental aspects of auxiliaries and washing chemicals are reviewed, followed by a discussion of garment washing and finishing processes.

Keywords

Denim Environmental impact Laser fading Ozone fading Sustainability Textiles Washing Washing auxiliaries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The primary author is grateful to the Republic of India for providing the best life and knowledge, and also thanks Mr. Subramani M. (Thailand), and Mr. Saravanan Varadharaj (Indonesia) for their fruitful discussions regarding this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Periyasamy AP, Jiri M (2017) Denim and consumers’ phase of life cycle. In: Muthu SS (ed) Sustainability in denim. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Duxford, United Kingdom, pp 257–282,  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00010-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Periyasamy AP, Chilukoti GR, Thavasiappan K (2012) Dry finishing: enhancing value of denim. Indian Text J 122(5):40–44,  http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=4330
  4. 4.
    McLoughlin J, Hayes S, Paul R (2015) Cotton fibre for denim manufacture. In: Paul R (ed) Denim and jeans. Woodhead Publishing, UK, pp 15–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patra AK, Pattanayak AK (2015) Novel varieties of denim fabrics. In: Paul R (ed) Denim. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 483–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan S, Malik A (2014) Environmental and health effects of textile industry wastewater. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Akhtar R (eds) Environmental deterioration and human health: natural and anthropogenic determinants. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott A (2015) Cutting out textile pollution. Chem Eng News 93:18–19Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karthik T, Gopalakrishnan D (2014) Environmental analysis of textile value chain: an overview. In: Muthu SS (ed) Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing: environmental and social aspects of textiles and clothing supply chain. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 153–188Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spengler JD, Sexton K (1983) Indoor air pollution: a public health perspective. Science 221(80):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Periyasamy AP, Wiener J, Militky J (2017) Life-cycle assessment of denim. In: Muthu SS (ed) Sustainability in denim. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Duxford, United Kingdom, pp 83–110,   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00004-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Periyasamy AP, Militky J (2017) Denim processing and health hazards. In: Muthu SS (ed) Sustainability in denim. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Duxford, United Kingdom, pp 161–196,   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00007-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lai PS, Christiani DC (2013) Long term respiratory health effects in textile workers. Curr Opin Pulm Med 19:152–157.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835cee9aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kininmonth M (2012) Greening of the denim supply chain. Lenzinger Berichte 90:8–15Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borbély É (2008) Lyocell, the new generation of regenerated cellulose. Acta Polytech Hungarica 5:11–18Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Periyasamy AP, Dhurai B, Thangamani K (2011) Salt-free dyeing—a new method of dyeing on lyocell/cotton blended fabrics with reactive dyes. Autex Res J 11:14–17,  http://www.autexrj.com/cms/zalaczone_pliki/3_01_11.pdf
  16. 16.
    Periyasamy AP, Dhurai B (2011) Salt free dyeing—a new method of dyeing on lyocell/cotton blended fabrics with reactive dyes. Pakistan Text J 60:41–43,  https://www.ptj.com.pk/Web-2011/04-2011/April-2011-PDF/Finishing-Aravin-Prince.pdf
  17. 17.
    Periyasamy, A.P., Rwahwire, S., Zhao, Y., 2018. Environmental Friendly Textile Processing, in: Martínez, L.M.T., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I. (Eds.), Handbook of Ecomaterials. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–38. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_176-1Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Periyasamy, A.P., Venkatesan, H., 2019. Eco Materials in Textile Finishing, in: Martínez, L.M.T., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I. (Eds.), Handbook of Ecomaterials. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_55-1Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Periyasamy AP, Dhurai B, Thangamani K (2011) A study on fibrillation properties of lyocell fiber. Colourage 58:45–48Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Periyasamy, A.P., 2016. Effect of PVAmHCl Pre-treatment on the Properties of Modal Fabric Dyed with Reactive Dyes: An Approach for Salt Free Dyeing. J. Text. Sci. Eng. 6: 262, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-8064.1000262
  21. 21.
    Achwal WB (1990) Environmental aspects of textile chemical processing: part-I. Colourage 37:40–44Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zaharia C, Suteu D, Muresan A et al (2009) Textile wastewater treatment by homogenous oxidation with hydrogen peroxide. Environ Eng Manag J 8:1359–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Periyasamy, A.P., 2013. Non-formaldehyde crease resistance finishing on tencel with poly maleic acid. Int. Dye. 198 (8), 37–39.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yan C, Kang W, Wang J et al (2014) Stretchable and wearable electrochromic devices. ACS Nano 8:316–322.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn404061gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roessler A, Crettenand D, Dossenbach O et al (2002) Direct electrochemical reduction of indigo. Electrochim Acta 47:1989–1995.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00028-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roessler A, Dossenbach O, Rys P, Marte W (2002) Direct electrochemical reduction of indigo: process optimization and scale-up in a flow cell. J Appl Electrochem 32:647–651.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020198116170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roessler A, Dossenbach O, Marte W, Rys P (2002) Electrocatalytic hydrogenation of vat dyes. Dyes Pigments 54:141–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208(02)00035-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Choudhury AKR (2017) 3—Environmental impacts of denim washing —Muthu, Subramanian Senthilkannan—Sustainability in denim. In: Text. Inst. B. Ser. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, United Kingdom, pp 49–81,  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00003-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu X, Kokare C (2017) Chapter 11—Microbial enzymes of use in industry. In: Goutam B (ed) Biotechnology of microbial enzymes. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp 267–298,   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00011-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Madhu A, Chakraborty JN (2017) Developments in application of enzymes for textile processing. J Clean Prod 145:114–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Campos R, Cavaco-Paulo A, Robra K-H et al (2001) Indigo degradation with laccases from Polyporus sp. and Sclerotium rolfsii. Text Res J 71:420–424.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750107100509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kan CW (2014) Colour fading effect of indigo-dyed cotton denim fabric by CO2 laser. Fibers Polym 15:426–429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-0426-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nayak R, Padhye R (2016) The use of laser in garment manufacturing: an overview. Fash Text 3:5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-016-0057-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Štěpánková M, Wiener J, Rusinová K (2011) Decolourization of vat dyes on cotton fabric with infrared laser light. Cellulose 18:469–478.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9494-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kan CW, Yuen CWM, Cheng CW (2010) Technical study of the effect of CO2 laser surface engraving on the colour properties of denim fabric. Color Technol 126:365–371.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2010.00270.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Akgun M, Araz O, Akkurt I et al (2008) An epidemic of silicosis among former denim sandblasters. Eur Respir J 32:1295–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00093507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schindler WD, Hauser PJ (2004) —Easy-care and durable press finishes of cellulosics. In: Schindler WD, Hauser PJ (eds) Chemical finishing of textiles. Woodhead Publishing,  Duxford, United Kingdom, pp 51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Latorre N, Silvestre JF, Monteagudo AF (2011) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Ed 102:86–97).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1578-2190(11)70765-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    (2016) Sustainable frontiers in denim finishing. In: Appar. Resour. https://www.apparelresources.com/business-news/sustainability/sustainable-frontiers-in-denim-finishing/. Accessed 10 July 2017
  40. 40.
    Bechtold T, Berktold F, Turcanu A (2000) The redox behaviour of CI sulphur black 1—a basis for improved understanding of sulphur dyeing. Color Technol 116:215–221.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2000.tb00041.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Teli MD, Paul R, Sachin LM (2001) Ecofriendly processing of sulphur and vat dyes—an overview. Indian J Fiber Text Res 26:101–107Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schrott W, Paul R (2015) Environmental impacts of denim manufacture —Denim. Woodhead Publishing Serial in Textiles. Woodhead Publishing,  Duxford, United Kingdom, pp 563–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aravin Prince Periyasamy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sunil Kumar Ramamoorthy
    • 2
  • Saatish Siddappa Lavate
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Textile EngineeringTechnical University of LiberecLiberecCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BorasBorasSweden
  3. 3.Department of TextilesDKTE’s Textile Engineering InstituteIchalkaranjiIndia

Personalised recommendations