Section Introduction: Ecological Aesthetics: New Spaces, Directions, and Potentials

  • David RousellEmail author
  • Dilafruz R. Williams
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


In this final section of the Handbook, we turn to ecological aesthetics in response to radical changes in both the nature of childhood and the nature of nature in the contemporary world. Artistic and aesthetic approaches have become increasingly relevant as children encounter a world typified by the acceleration of social, technological, and environmental change, and the mutually reinforcing conditions of planetary instability, inequality, and precarity. Anthropogenic climate change, the mass extinction of plant and animal life, and the chemical contamination of air, food, soil, and water resources are transforming not only what we might think of as “the environment,” but also the aesthetic qualities and environmental sensibilities that constitute the experience of being alive. For many scholars these changing conditions of Earthly life have taken on the name of ‘Anthropocene’, an epoch defined by the total imbrication of human life with more than human planetary systems and technologies. The authors in this section take up ecological aesthetics as a relational, experimental, and theoretically adventurous field which aims to grasp the experiential qualities of life under these changing conditions, and to imagine alternatives. With chapters focusing on the role of movement, nature-study, poetry, pattern, sense-awareness, and the creation of experimental works of art, this section highlights interdisciplinary research and pedagogy which attends to richly textured compositions of childhoodnature experience through a diverse range of material, social and conceptual practices. In drawing together a range of Indigenous, speculative, sensory, cultural, empirical, and artistic approaches, the range of chapters collected in this section attests to the diversity and emergent shaping of ecological aesthetics as a field that is still very much in the making.


Ecological aesthetics Indigenous philosophies Childhoodnature The speculative turn New empiricisms 


  1. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cajete, G. (2006). Western science and the loss of natural creativity. In D. T. Jacobs (Ed.), Unlearning the language of conquest (pp. 247–259). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carson, R. (1941). Under the sea wind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Carson, R. (1951). The sea around us. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Carson, R. (1965). The sense of wonder. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. Colebrook, C. (2014). Death of the PostHuman: Essays on extinction (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Debaise, D. (2016). Speculative empiricism: Revisiting whitehead. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Debaise, D. (2017). Nature as event: The lure of the possible. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demos, T. J. (2017). Against the Anthropocene: Visual culture and environment today. Berlin, Germany: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frost, S. (2016). Biocultural creatures: Toward a new theory of the human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, M. B. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of 21st century media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horton, J. L. (2017). Indigenous artists against the Anthropocene. Art Journal, 76(2), 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolozova, K. (2016). Preface: After the “speculative turn”. In K. Kolozova & E. A. Joy (Eds.), After the “speculative turn”: Realism, philosophy, and feminism (pp. 9–17). New York, NY: Punctum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levertov, D. (1979). Collected earlier poems, 1940–1960. New York, NY: New Directions Books.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, J. W. (2017). The capitalocene, part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Oxford English Dictionary. (2017). Aesthetic. Retrieved 20 May from
  21. Povinelli, E. A. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Protevi, J. (2013). Life, war, earth: Deleuze and the sciences. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rousell, D. (2016). Dwelling in the Anthropocene: Reimagining university learning environments in response to social and ecological change. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(02), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaviro, S. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
  26. Stengers, I. (2016). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism (A. Goffrey, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  27. Todd, Z. (2015). Indigenizing the Anthropocene. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies (pp. 241–254). London, England: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  28. Whitehead, A. N. (1967). Science and the modern world. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Whitehead, A. N. (2004). The concept of nature. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Press.Google Scholar
  31. Yusoff, K. (2015). Geologic subjects: Nonhuman origins, geomorphic aesthetics and the art of becoming inhuman. Cultural Geographies, 22(3), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Leadership for Sustainability Education, Graduate School of EducationPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • David Rousell
    • 1
  • Dilafruz Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolian UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations