Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Sustainable Development Goals and Networks as a Collaboration Model

  • Lauren Barredo
  • Maria Cortes-Puch
  • Cheyenne MaddoxEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_530-1

Definition

A dictionary definition of a “network” is any system of interconnected things. However, this basic definition could also be applied to a multilateral agreement or any partnership with enough actors to be considered a system. For the purposes of this paper, the authors define networks as having several key attributes that differentiate them from multilateral agreements or partnerships. The intent of networks is one attribute; actors in networks come together to leverage each other’s strengths and pursue a common objective of mutual benefit to all participants. Another characteristic is their horizontal or lateral organizational structure, which allows members to come together as equals. Additional elements are the number of organizations involved, with a network placing no limit on the number of members, and an inclusive rather than exclusive membership structure. Clear guidelines for membership are another key attribute, including organized mechanisms for institutions or...

Keywords

Sustainable development Sustainable development goals SDGs Networks Collaboration Partnership Organizational networks Institutions 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abreu M, Grinevich V, Hughes A, Kitson M (2009) Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public, and third sectors. The UK Innovation Research Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Barasa E, Mbau R, Gilson L (2018) What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. Int J Health Policy Manag 7(6):491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen F, Newenham–Kahindi A, Herremans I (2010) When suits meet roots: the antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. J Bus Ethics 95(2):297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Büchel B, Raub S (2002) Building knowledge-creating value networks. Eur Manag J 20(6):587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. C40 Cities (2018a) About. C40 Cities. https://www.c40.org/about. Retrieved 16 Aug 2018
  6. C40 Cities (2018b) Networks. C40 Cities. https://www.c40.org/networks. Retrieved 16 Aug 2018
  7. El-Jardali F, Ataya N, Fadlallah R (2018) Changing roles of universities in the era of SDGs: rising up to the global challenge through institutionalizing partnerships with governments and communities. Health Res Policy Syst 16(38):2Google Scholar
  8. Freedom to Marry (2016) Mayors for Freedom to Marry. Freedom to Marry. http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/Mayors-For-The-Freedom-To-Marry. Retrieved 16 Aug 2018
  9. Future Earth (2018a) Knowledge-action networks. Future Earth. http://futureearth.org/knowledge-action-networks
  10. Future Earth (2018b) About us. Future Earth. http://futureearth.org/about. Retrieved 18 Aug 2018
  11. Galway LP, Corbett KK, Zeng L (2012) Where are the NGOs and why? The distribution of health and development NGOs in Bolivia. Glob Health 8:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GIZ (The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH) (2015) Work the Net, A management guide for existing and emerging formal networks. https://networkingaction.net/wp-content/uploads/GTZ-2006.-A-management-guide-for-networks.pdf. Retrieved 18 Aug 2018
  13. Gneiting U (2015) Private sector accountability & the SDGs: what is the role of the UN guiding principles? Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/private-sector-accountability-the-sdgs-what-is-the-role-of-the-un-guiding-principles. Retrieved 30 Aug 2018
  14. Guar NH, Rajewska N (2016) Advancing the sustainable development goals: business action and millennials’ views. Corporate Citizenship, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. PNAS 101(46):16385–16389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Network on Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage (2018) International network on household water treatment and safe storage. The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http://hwts.web.unc.edu. Accessed 29 Aug 2018
  17. Kibret S, Glenn Wilson G, Tekie H, Petros B (2014) Increased malaria transmission around irrigation schemes in Ethiopia and the potential of canal water management for malaria vector control. Malar J 13:360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee T, Koski C (2014) Mitigating global warming in global cities: comparing participation and climate change policies of C40 cities. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract 16(5):475–492Google Scholar
  19. OECD (2017) Getting governments organised to deliver on the sustainable development goals summary report and next steps. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/gov/SDGs-Summary-Report-WEB.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2018
  20. Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 12:295–336Google Scholar
  21. Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) (2016) SUN Movement Strategy and Roadmap (2016–2020). SUN. https://scalingupnutrition.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SR_20160901_ENG_web_pages.pdf. Retrieved 10 Oct 2018
  22. Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) (2018a) SUN support structure. SUN. https://scalingupnutrition.org/sun-supporters/how-is-the-movement-supported. Retrieved 10 Oct 2018
  23. Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) (2018b) How do countries join. SUN. https://scalingupnutrition.org/about-sun/the-vision-and-principles-of-sun/how-do-countries-join. Retrieved 10 Oct 2018
  24. Sloan P, Oliver D (2013) Building trust in multi-stakeholder partnerships: critical emotional incidents and practices of engagement. Organ Stud 34(12):1835–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevenson JR, Chang-Richards Y, Conradson D, Wilkinson S, Vargo J, Seville E, Brunsdon D (2014) Organizational networks and recovery following the Canterbury earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(1):555–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stibbe D, Reid S, Gilbert J (2018) Maximising the impact of partnerships for the SDGs: a practical guide to partnership value creation, working version for consultation. The Partnering Initiative (TPI) and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2018a) Vision and organization. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. http://unsdsn.org/about-us/vision-and-organization/. Retrieved 16 Aug 2018
  28. Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2018b) SDG index and dashboards. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. http://www.sdgindex.org. Retrieved 29 Aug 2018
  29. Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2018c) SDSN networks in action. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. http://unsdsn.org/resources/publications/networks-in-action-2018/. Retrieved 9 Oct 2019
  30. The Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data (GPSDD) (2016a) Partners. GPSDD. http://marketplace.data4sdgs.org/index.php/partner-listing. Retrieved 30 Aug 2018
  31. The Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data (GPSDD) (2016b) Data4SDGs Toolbox. GPSDD. http://marketplace.data4sdgs.org/initiatives/data4sdgs-toolbox. Retrieved 30 Aug 2018
  32. The United States Conference of Mayors (2008) Main street stimulus. The United States Conference of Mayors. http://usmayors.org/workforce/documents/11-07-08USCMMainStreetStimulusFinal.pdf. Retrieved 16 Aug 2018
  33. The United States Conference of Mayors (2018) About the conference. The United States Conference of Mayors. https://www.usmayors.org/the-conference/about/. Retrieved 16 Aug 2018
  34. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Resolution A/RES/70/1). United Nations, New York. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Retrieved 29 Aug 2018Google Scholar
  35. Walls JL, Berrone P (2017) The Power of one to make a difference: how informal and formal CEO power affect environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics 145(2):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. WBCSD (2018a) About Us. WBCSD. https://www.wbcsd.org/Overview/About-us. Retrieved 20 Aug 2018
  37. WBCSD (2018b) CEO Guides. WBCSD. https://www.wbcsd.org/Overview/CEO-Guides. Retrieved 20 Aug 2018
  38. WBCSD (2018c) Panorama. WBCSD. https://www.wbcsd.org/Overview/Panorama. Retrieved 20 Aug 2018
  39. Wogan JB (2014) How mayors used the stimulus for energy efficiency projects. Governing the States and Localities. March 3 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Barredo
    • 1
  • Maria Cortes-Puch
    • 1
  • Cheyenne Maddox
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN)New YorkUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Petra Molthan-Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK