Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Conscious Consumption and Sustainable Development

  • Kathleen KevanyEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_269-1

Definition

To consume consciously is a process of deliberation to purposefully and thoughtfully consume what is beneficial and necessary and not consume unconsciously things that are unhelpful or harmful. Conscious consumption also is a philosophy and growing social movement that encourages citizens to become aware of the impact of their consumption practices on their own health and well-being and to consider the social, economic, environmental, and communal implications. This movement pays attention to the effects of media and advertising on citizen-consumer behavior. Conscious consumption may form part of government strategies used to promote ways to address the growing crises of climate change and noncommunicable diseases.

Sustainability requires a focus on principles of equity, inclusion, and distribution and the long-term state of the environment (Hopwood et al. 2015). Sustaining species and ecosystems must be done in ways that allow them to go on renewing themselves indefinitely...

Keywords

Consciousness Consumption Climate change Reflection Values education Reduction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams T (2014) Brands must embrace the future of fully conscious consumption. The Guardian, Marketing and Sustainability. 23 Apr 2014, p 106Google Scholar
  2. Anand S, Sen A (2000) Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev 28(12):2029–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antunes da Luz A, de Francisco A, Miranda Santos S, Mesquita Soares A, Kovaleski J (2016) Sustainable development and conscious consumption: a perception of undergraduate interns in the region of camps Gerais, Parana, Brazil. Interciencia 41(5):312–318. Accessed 20 Nov 2017 at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33945552004Google Scholar
  4. Brookfield SD (2000) Transformative learning as ideology critique. In: Mezirow, Associates J, Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Kindle ed. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. pp. 125–148Google Scholar
  5. Empowering the spirit (2017) Seven sacred teachings. Accessed on 12 Dec 2017 at http://empoweringthespirit.ca/cultural-awareness/seven-grandfathers-teachings/
  6. Fox M (1979) A spirituality named compassion. Harper and Row Pub, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox M (1994) The reinvention of work: a new vision of livelihood for our time. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Galtung J (1969) Violence, peace, and peace research. J Peace Res 6(3):167–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gekko G (1987) Wall street, Hollywood filmGoogle Scholar
  10. Goleman D (2009) Sustainability: the future of ecological leadership. Harvard Business Review online. https://hbr.org/2009/05/the-future-of-ecological-leade.html. (Cons.03/22/2016)
  11. Gross A (2017) Cottage living: the pros and cons of a small footprint. Newsday, Lifestyle Home and GardenGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawken P (1993) The ecology of commerce: declaration of sustainability. HarperCollins Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopwood B, Mellor M, O’Brien G (2015) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13:38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) (1980) World Conservation Strategy. Accessed 14 Mar 2004. http://sustainability.psu.edu/fieldguide/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/IUCN_World-Conservation-Strategy.pdf
  15. Jackson T (2006) Beyond the ‘Wellbeing Paradox’: – wellbeing, consumption growth and sustainability. University of Surrey, Surrey. https://www.surrey.ac.uk/ces/files/pdf/0606_WP_Wellbeing_and_SD.pdfGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston J (2008) The citizen-consumer hybrid: ideological tensions and the case of whole foods market. Theory Soc 37(3):229–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy A (2010) 2010. Using community-based social marketing techniques to enhance environmental regulation. Sustainability 2(4):1138–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kevany KD (2002) The art of stewardship: service beyond self, doctoral thesis. University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  19. Krishnamurti J (1953) Education and the significance of life. Harper & Row, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Levan C (1998) Living in the maybe: a steward confronts the spirit of fundamentalism. W.B. Eerdmans, Grand RapidsGoogle Scholar
  21. Mezirow JE (1990) Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass, San FransiscoGoogle Scholar
  22. Orr DW (2004) Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Roszak T (1992) The voice of the earth: and exploration of Ecopsychology. Touchstone Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Sassatelli R (2006) Virtue, responsibility and consumer choice: framing critical consumerism. In: Brewer J, Trentmann F (eds) Consuming cultures, global perspectives: historical trajectories, transnational exchanges. Berg, Oxford, pp 219–250Google Scholar
  25. Spaargaren G (2011) Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Glob Environ Chang 21(3):813–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Statista (2017) Global advertising market – statistics & facts. The statistics portal. https://www.statista.com/topics/990/global-advertising-market/
  27. Taylor C (2007) A Secular Age. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Ten Transformers from the website homeplanet.org
  29. Theobald R (1997) The Challenge of abundance. New Society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  30. Wallis J (1994) Soul of politics: beyond the religious right and secular left. Harcourt Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Wals AEJ (2014) Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN DESD: a review of learning and institutionalization processes. J Clean Prod 62:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wren-Lewis J (n.d.) The Dazzling Dark, John Wren-Lewis – a near-death experience opens the door to a permanent transformation. http://www.capacitie.org/wren/archive.htm
  33. WWF (2016) Living planet report 2016 summary. Accessed on 27 October 2017, http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2016_summary_high_res.pdf
  34. Yao L, Liu L, Wang R, Yin K, Han B (2015) A qualitative network model for understanding regional metabolism in the context of Social–Economic–Natural Complex Ecosystem theory. Eco Inform 26(Part 1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Business & Social SciencesDalhousie UniversityTruroCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Madhavi Venkatesan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA