Advertisement

Labor and Employment Practices: the Rise and Fall of the New Managerialism

  • John GodardEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Since the beginning of industrial capitalism, labor resistance and control have been central problems for management. Yet these problems have varied considerably, in large part depending on the context within which the employment relation is embedded and particularly the broader political economy characterizing it. Workplace and management practices have tended to develop in reflection of this context, while forming an important component of it, with social as well as economic consequences. This chapter addresses these practices, the conditions under which they have developed from the 1950s to present, and what some of their consequences have been. Although focus is on the practices believed to be dominant at various points in time, variation across and within nations is also addressed.

Keywords

management history work employment HRM managerialism 

References

  1. Adams R (1995) Industrial relations under liberal democracy. University of South Carolina Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrighi G (2007) Adam Smith in Beijing. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson J (1984) Management strategies for a flexible organization. Pers Manag 16(8):28–31Google Scholar
  4. Averitt RT (1968) The dual economy: the dynamics of American industry structure. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Beer M, Spector B, Lawrence PR, Quinn Mills D, Walton RE (1984) Managing human assets. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer M, Spector B, Lawrence PR, Quinn Mills D, Walton RE (1985) Human resource management: a general manager’s perspective. Text and cases. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer M, Bosalie P, Brewster C (2015) Implications for the field of HRM of the multi-stakeholder perspective proposed thirty years ago. J Hum Resource Manage 54(3):427–438Google Scholar
  8. Bendix R (1956) Work and authority in industry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernhardt A (2014) Labour standards and the organization of work: gaps in data and research. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley. http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/files/2014/Labor-Standards-and-the-Reorganization-of-Work.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernhardt A, Batt R , Houseman S, Appelbaum E (2016) Domestic outsourcing in the U.S.: a research agenda to assess trends and effects on job quality. Prepared for the future of work symposium, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, Dec 2015Google Scholar
  11. Bewley H (2013) “Changes in the institutions and practice of workplace employment relations” presentation to the British Academy, Nov 2013Google Scholar
  12. Blasi J, Kruse D (2006) U.S. high performance work practices at century’s end. Ind Relat 45:457–478Google Scholar
  13. Bockerman P, Bryson A, Ilmakunnas P (2012) Does high involvement management improve worker well-being? J Econ Behav Organ 84:660–680Google Scholar
  14. Boudreau J, Lawler EE III (2014) Stubborn traditionalism in HRM: causes and consequences. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):232–244Google Scholar
  15. Burawoy M (1985) The politics of production. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Combs J, Hall A, Liu Y, Ketchen D (2006) Do high performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Pers Psychol 59:501–528Google Scholar
  17. Delaney J, Godard J (2001) An industrial relations perspective on the high performance paradigm. Hum Resour Manage Rev 11:395–429Google Scholar
  18. Dore R (2000) Stock market capitalism: welfare capitalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Dundon T, Rafferty A (2018) The (potential) demise of HRM? Hum Resour Manag J 28:1–15Google Scholar
  20. Edwards Richard (1979) Contested Terrain. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  21. Fairris D (1994) Shopfloor relations in the postwar capital-labor accord. In: Kotz D, McDonough T, Reich M (eds) Social structures of accumulation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Farber H (2015) Job loss in the great recession and it aftermath: U.S. evidence from the displaced workers survey, Working paper #589. Princeton University Industrial Relations SectionGoogle Scholar
  23. Frege C, Godard J (2014) Varieties of capitalism and job quality: the attainment of civic principles at work in the USA and Germany. Am Sociol Rev 79(5):942–965Google Scholar
  24. Galbraith JK (1973) Economics and the public purpose. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Gittell JH (2016) Transforming relationships for high performance: the power of relational coordination. Stanford Business Books/Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Glyn A (2006) Capitalism unleashed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Godard J (2004) A critical assessment of the high performance paradigm. Br J Ind Relat 42-2:349–378Google Scholar
  28. Godard J (2009) The exceptional decline of the American labor movement. Ind Labor Relat Rev 63(1):81–107Google Scholar
  29. Godard J (2010) What’s best for workers? The implications of work and human resource practices revisited. Ind Relat 49(3):465–487Google Scholar
  30. Godard J (2011) Whatever happened to strikes? Br J Ind Relat 49-2:282–303Google Scholar
  31. Godard J (2014) The psychologisation of employment relations? Hum Resour Manag J 24(1):1–18Google Scholar
  32. Godard J (2017) Industrial relations, the economy, and society, 5th edn. Captus Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Godard J (2019) forthcoming in Work and Employment Practices in Comparative Perspective. C Frege and J Kelly (eds.) Comparative Employment Relations, 2nd edn. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Godard J, Delaney J (2000) Reflections on the ‘high performance’ paradigm’s implications for industrial relations as a field. Ind Labor Relat Rev 53(3):482–502Google Scholar
  35. Graham L (1993) Inside a Japanese transplant: a critical perspective. Work Occup 20(2):174–193Google Scholar
  36. Green F (2004) Why has work effort become more intense? Ind Relat 43(4):709–741Google Scholar
  37. Green F (2006) Demanding work. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  38. Greer CR, Youngblood SA, Gray DA (1999) Human resource management outsourcing: the make or buy decision. Acad Manag Exec 13(3):86–96Google Scholar
  39. Guest D, Bryson A (2009) From industrial relations to human resource management: the changing role of the personnel function. In: Brown W, Bryson A, Forth J, Whitfield K (eds) The evolution of the modern workplace. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Hall J, Krueger A (2018) An analysis of the labor market for uber’s driver partners in the United States. Ind Labor Relat Rev 71(3):705–732Google Scholar
  41. Harvey D (1989) The condition of modernity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  43. Head S (2014) Mindless: why smarter machines are making dumber humans. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Ho K (2009) Liquidated: an ethnography of wall street. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  45. Jacoby S (1991) American exceptionalism revisited. In: Jacoby S (ed) Masters to managers: historical and comparative perspectives on American employers. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 173–200Google Scholar
  46. Jacoby S (1997) Modern Manors: welfare capitalism since the new deal. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  47. Jiang K, Lepak D, Hu J, Baer J (2012) How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes: a meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms? Acad Manag J 55(6):1264–1294Google Scholar
  48. Katz LF, Krueger AB (2016) The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015, NBER working paper 22667Google Scholar
  49. Katz LF, Krueger AB (2017) The role of unemployment in the rise of alternative work arrangements. Am Econ Rev 107(5):388–392Google Scholar
  50. Kaufman BE (2015) Market competition, HRM, and firm performance: the conventional paradigm critiqued and reformulated. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25:107–125Google Scholar
  51. Kersely, Barbara, Carmen Alpin, John Forth et al. (2006) Inside the Workplace. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Kersley B et al (2006) Inside the workplace: findings from the 2004 worplace employment relations survey. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Kochan TA (2007) Social legitimacy of the HRM profession: a U.S. perspective. In: Boxall P, Purcell J, Wright P (eds) The Oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Kochan TA, Barocci TA (1985) Industrial relations and human resource management. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  55. Kochan T, Osterman P (1994) The mutual gains enterprise. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  56. Lawler EEIII (1986) High involvement management. Josey Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  57. Legge K (1995a) Rhetoric, reality, and hidden agendas. In: Sotrey J (ed) Human resource management: a critical text. Routledge, London, pp 33–59Google Scholar
  58. Legge K (1995b) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  59. Lorenz E, Valeyre A (2005) Organizational innovation, HRM, and labour market structure: a comparison of the EU-15. J Ind Relat 47(4):424–442Google Scholar
  60. Marsden D (1999) A theory of employment systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Marsden D, Canibano A (2010) An economic perspective4 on employee participation. In: Wilkinson A, Gollan P, Marchington M, Lewin D (eds) The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations. OUP, Oxford, pp 130–163Google Scholar
  62. Martin L (2017) Do innovative work practices and use of information and communications technologies motivate employees? Ind Relat 56(2):263–292Google Scholar
  63. Mills CW (1948) The new men of power. Harcourt Brace, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  64. OECD (2017) StatExtracts. OECD, Geneva. https://stats.oecd.org/
  65. O’Toole J et al (1973) Work in America. Report of a task force to the secretary of health, education, and welfare. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Ouchi W (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Adm Sci Q 25(1):129–141Google Scholar
  67. Ouchi W (1982) Theory Z. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Paulsen R (2014) Empty labor. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Perlman S (1949 [1928]) A theory of the labour movement. Augustus Kelly, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Pfeffer J (1994) Competitive advantage through people. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  71. Strauss G (2001) HRM in the USA: correcting some British impressions. Int J Hum Resour Manag 12(6):873–897Google Scholar
  72. Thelen Kathleen (2014) Varieties of Liberalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  73. Tichy N, Fombrun C, Devanna M (1982) Strategic human resource management. Sloan Manag Rev 23(2):47–61Google Scholar
  74. Townley B (1994) Reframing human resource management: power, ethics, and the subject of work. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Vallas SP (2006) Empowerment redux: structure, agency, and the remaking of managerial authority. Am J Sociol 111(6):1677–1717Google Scholar
  76. Wall T, Wood S (2006) The romance of human resource management and business performance: the case for big science. Hum Relat 58(4):429–462Google Scholar
  77. Wanrooy V, Bewley H, Bryson A et al (2013) Employment relations in the shadow of recession. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundsmillsGoogle Scholar
  78. Wood S, Bryson A (2009) High involvement management. In: Brown W, Bryson A, Forth J, Whitfield K (eds) The evolution of the modern workplace. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations