Advertisement

Chandler and the Visible Hand of Management

  • Kevin D. TennentEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

The work of Alfred D. Chandler Jr. (1918–2007) was undoubtedly path breaking as well as paradigm building. His corpus of work can claim foundational relevance to at least two separate subfields of the management studies discipline – strategic management, and management/business history, together with theory sets such as transaction cost economics and historical institutionalism. Chandler’s career was profoundly important in building the management studies discipline in both theoretical and empirical terms, seeking to explain the rise of the “modern industrial enterprise,” yet it requires understanding within its own historical context. Chandler’s work remains resonant today, and this chapter aims to critically explore the implications of this phenomenon, both interrogating the affirmative impacts of his writing and the contemporary world it reflected as well as that of his critics.

Keywords

Alfred D. Chandler Business history Strategic management Institutional theory Managerialism 

References

  1. Ansoff HI (1965) Corporate strategy. An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage anonymous. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  3. Bateman TS, Snell SS (2009) Management: leading and collaborating in a competitive World. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Berle A, Means G (1932) The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman M (1982) All that is solid melts into air: the experience of modernity. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Braudel F (1972) In: Reynolds S (ed) The mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridgman T, Cummings S (2011) The relevant past : why the history of management should be critical for our future. Acad Manag Learn Educ 10(1):77–93Google Scholar
  8. Burgelman RA (1983) A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Acad Manag Rev 8(1):61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter C, Clegg SR, Kornberger M (2008) A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying strategy. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Casson M (1998) An economic theory of the free-standing company. In: Wilkins M, Schröter H (eds) The free standing company in the world economy, 1830–1996. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandler A (1954) Patterns of American railroad finance, 1830–50. Bus Hist Rev 28(3):248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandler AD (1956) Management decentralization: an historical analysis. Bus Hist Rev 30(2):111–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. M.I.T. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Chandler AD (1977) The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandler AD (2001) Inventing the electronic century: the epic story of the consumer electronics and computer industries. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Chandler AD (2005) Shaping the industrial century: the remarkable story of the modern chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chandler AD, Daems H (1979) Administrative coordination, allocation and monitoring: a comparative analysis of the emergence of accounting and organization in the U.S.A. and Europe. Acc Organ Soc 4(1–2):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chandler AD, Hikino T (1990) Scale and scope : the dynamics of industrial capitalism repr. 1990. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Chia RCH, Holt R (2009) Strategy without design: the silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Christensen CR, Andrews KR, Bower JL (1978) Business policy: text and cases. Richard D. Irwin, Inc, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  21. Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooke B (2003) The denial of slavery in management studies. J Manag Stud 40(8):1895–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cooke B, Mills AJ, Kelley ES (2005a) Situating maslow in cold war America. Group Org Manag 30(2):129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooke B, Mills AJ, Kelley ES (2005b) Situating maslow in cold war America: a recontextualization of management theory. Group Org Manag 30(2):129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cummings S et al (2017) A new history of management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Daughen JR, Binzen P (1971) The wreck of the Penn central. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35(12):1504–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DiMaggio PJ (1988) Interest and agency in insititutional theory. In: Zucker LG (ed) Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Drucker P (1946) Concept of the corporation. The John Day Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Elton GR (1978) The practice of history. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Fligstein N (1990) The transformation of corporate control. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Fligstein N (2008) Chandler and the sociology of organizations. Bus Hist Rev 82(2):241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Flyvbjerg B (2014) What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview. Proj Manag J 45(2):6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeland RF (2001) The struggle for control of the modern corporation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Genoe McLaren P, Mills AJ (2008) A product of “his” time? Exploring the construct of the ideal manager in the Cold War era. J Manag Hist 14(4):386–403Google Scholar
  36. George CS (1968) The history of management thought. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  37. Gillett AG, Tennent KD (2017) Dynamic sublimes, changing plans, and the legacy of a megaproject: the case of the 1966 Soccer World Cup. Proj Manag J 48(6):93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gillett AG, Tennent KD (2018) Shadow hybridity and the institutional logic of professional sport: perpetuating a sporting business in times of rapid social and economic change. J Manag Hist 24(2):228–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33(3):114–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Green A, Troup K (1999) The houses of history: a critical reader in twentieth-centry history and theory. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Hannah L (2009) Strategic games, scale and efficiency, or chandler goes to hollywood. In: Coopey R, Lyth P (eds) Business in Britian in the twentieth century. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):986–1014. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Higgins DM, Toms S (2011) Explaining corporate success: the structure and performance of British firms, 1950–84. Bus Hist 53(1):85–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. Strateg Manag J 26(5):395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. John RR (1997) Elaborations, revisions, dissents: Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.’ s, “the visible hand” after twenty years. Bus Hist Rev 71(2):151–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. John RR (2008) Turner, beard, chandler: progressive historians. Bus Hist Rev 82(2):227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones G (2005) Multinationals and global capitalism: from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Kelley ES, Mills AJ, Cooke B (2006) Management as a cold war phenomenon? Hum Relat 59(5):603–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Khurana R (2007) From higher aims to hired hands. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  51. Lamoreaux NR, Raff DMG, Temin P (2004) Against whig history. Enterp Soc 5(3):376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Langlois RN (2003) The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Ind Corp Chang 12(2):351–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Langlois RN (2004) Chandler in a larger frame: markets, transaction costs, and organizational form in history. Enterp Soc 5(3):355–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lazonick W (2013) From innovation to financialization: how shareholder value ideology is destroying the US economy. In: Wolfson MH, Epstein GA (eds) The handbook of the political economy of financial crises. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  55. Lazonick W, O’Sullivan M (2000) Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Econ Soc 29(1):13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ (2003) An empirical examination of transaction-and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strateg Manag J 24(9):839–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Maclean M, Harvey C, Clegg SR (2016) Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Acad Manag Rev 41(4):609–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mahoney JT, Pandian JR (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strateg Manag J 13(5):363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McCloskey DN (1998) The rhetoric of economics. Univ of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  60. Mintzberg H (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Manag Sci 24(9):934–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mintzberg H (1990) The design school : reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strateg Manag J 11(3):171–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mintzberg H (1994) The rise and fall of strategic planning. Prentice Hall, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  63. Mintzberg H (2004) Managers not MBAs: a hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  64. Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg Manag J 6(3):257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (1998) Strategy safari: the complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. Financial Times, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  66. Mollan S (2018) The free-standing company: a “zombie” theory of international business history. J Manag Hist 22(2):156–173Google Scholar
  67. Mollan S, Tennent KD (2015) International taxation and corporate strategy: evidence from British overseas business, circa 1900–1965. Bus Hist 57(7):1054–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morris PWG, Geraldi J (2011) Managing the institutional context for projects. Proj Manag J 42(6):20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Penrose E (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Sharpe, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Pollard S (1965) The genesis of modern management: a study of the industrial revolution in Great Britian. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  71. Porter M (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Harv Bus Rev 57(2):137–145Google Scholar
  72. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harv Bus Rev 68(3):79–91. Hahn D, Taylor B (eds)Google Scholar
  75. Rowlinson M, Hassard J, Decker S (2014) Research strategies for organizational history: a dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Acad Manag Rev 39(3):250–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rue LW, Byars LL (2009) Management: skills and applications. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  77. Scarborough WK (1966) The overseer: plantation management in the Old South. Louisiana State University Press, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
  78. Scott WR (2001) Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Scranton P (1998) Endless novelty: speciailty production and American industrialization, 1865-1925. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  80. Scranton P (2014) Projects as a focus for historical analysis: surveying the landscape. Hist Technol 30(4):354–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Selznick P (1957) Leadership in administration. Haprer & Row, Publishers, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Sloan AP (1967) In: McDonald J, Stevens C (eds) My years with general motors. Pan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. George Routledge and Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith A, Tennent KD, Russell J (2018) Berle and means’ the modern corporation and private property: the military roots of a stakeholder model of corporate governance. Seattle Univ Law Rev 42(2) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  85. Söderlund J, Lenfle S (2013) Making project history: revisiting the past, creating the future. Int J Proj Manag 31(5):653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Spector B (2006) The harvard business review goes to war. Manag Organ Hist 1(3):273–295Google Scholar
  87. Spector B (2008) “Business responsibilities in a divided world”: the cold war roots of the corporate social responsibility movement. Enterp Soc 9(2):314–336Google Scholar
  88. Spector B (2014) Flawed from the “Get-Go”: Lee Iacocca and the origins of transformational leadership. Leadership 10(3):361–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stout L (2002) Bad and Not-so-Bad arguments for shareholder primacy. Calif Law Rev 75:1189–1209Google Scholar
  90. Stout LA (2007) The mythical benefits of shareholder control. Va Law Rev 93(3):789–809Google Scholar
  91. Stout L (2012) The shareholder value myth. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  92. Taylor S, Bell E, Cooke B (2009) Business history and the historiographical operation. (February 2015), 37–41Google Scholar
  93. Teece DJ (1980) Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J Econ Behav Organ 1(3):223–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Teece DJ (1993) The dynamics of industrial capitalism: perspectives on Alfred Chandler’s scale and scope. J Econ Lit 31(1):199–225Google Scholar
  95. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 1350:1319–1350. NE Al (ed)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):172–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG (eds)Google Scholar
  98. Tennent KD (2009) Owned, monitored, but not always controlled: understanding the success and failure of Scottish free-standing companies, 1862–1910. Unpublished PhD Thesis, LSE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  99. Tennent KD (2013) Management and the free-standing company: the New Zealand and Australia land company c. 1866–1900. J Imp Commonw Hist 41(1):81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tennent KD, Gillett AG (2016) Foundations of managing sporting events. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. The Economist (2009) Guru: Alfred Chandler. https://www.economist.com/news/2009/04/09/alfred-chandler. Accessed 21 Dec 2018
  102. Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional Logics. In: Green R et al (eds) The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications, London, pp 99–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. von Ranke L (1973) In: Iggers GG, von Moltke K (eds) The theory and practice of history 1973 repri. The Bobs-Merrill Company, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  104. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wilkins M (1970) The emergence of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from the colonial era to 1914. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  106. Wilkins M (1986) Defining a firm: history and theory. In: Hertner P, Jones G (eds) Multinationals: theory and history. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  107. Wilkins M (1988) The free-standing company, 1870–1914: an important type of British foreign direct investment. Econ Hist Rev 41(2):259–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wilkins M (1989) The history of foreign investment in the United States to 1914. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  109. Wilkins M (1998) The free-standing company revisited. In: Wilkins M, Schröter H (eds) The free-standing company in the World economy, 1830–1996. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  110. Williamson OE (1981) The economics of organization : the transaction cost approach. De Economist 87(3):548–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Williamson OE (1989) Transaction cost economics. In: Armstrong M, Porter R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization vol 3. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam, pp 135–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Williamson OE (1998) Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De Economist 146(1):23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wren D (1972) The evolution of management thought. The Ronald Press Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The York Management SchoolUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations