Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

Living Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Predicting ICT Skills and ICT Use of University Students

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_226-1



One need not be an expert in information and communications technology (ICT) to realize the ever-increasing influence on and omnipresence of ICT applications in the society. It is therefore easily assumed that everyone possesses basic ICT skills and can use simple ICT applications. Especially university students, who are considered to be “digital natives” and who have had ample exposure to a variety of ICT applications and training, are often thought to be a homogenous group with near-perfect basic ICT skills and highly frequent ICT use. This, however, is contradicted by research, and the current paper aims to provide some answers to the question why...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Al-Emran M, Mezhuyev V, Kamaludin A (2018) Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: a systematic review. Comput Educ 125(October):389–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslanidou S, Menexes G (2008) Youth and the Internet: uses and practices in the home. Comput Educ 51(3):1375–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron B, Walter SE, Martin CK, Schatz C (2010) Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two Silicon Valley middle schools. Comput Educ 54(1):178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett R (2009) Academic self-concept among business students in a recruiting university: definition, measurement and potential effects. J Furth High Educ 33(2):141–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke P, Reitzes D (1991) An identity theory approach to commitment. Soc Psychol Q 54(3):239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheung D (2009) Developing a scale to measure students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons. Int J Sci Educ 31(16):2185–2203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox MJ (2013) Formal to informal learning with IT: research challenges and issues for e-learning. J Comput Assist Learn 29(1):85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Wit K, Heerwegh D, Verhoeven JC (2012) Changes in the basic ICT skills of freshmen between 2005 and 2009: who’s catching up and who’s still behind? Educ Inf Technol 17(2):205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey J (1917) The need for a recovery of philosophy. In: Dewey J (ed) Creative intelligence: essays in the pragmatic attitude. Holt, New York, pp 3–69Google Scholar
  11. Dewey J (1933/1960) How we think. D.C. Heath and Company, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. ECDL (2010) ECDL syllabus 5.0. ECDL Nederland NV, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans KG (2000) Reclaiming John Dewey: democracy, inquiry, pragmatism, and public management. Adm Soc 32(3):308–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldhammer F, Gniewosz G, Zylka J (2016) ICT engagement in learning environments. In: Kuger S, Klieme E, Jude N, Kaplan D (eds) Assessing contexts of learning, an international perspective. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham, pp 331–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45357-6_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hargittai E (2010) Digital na(t)ives. Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociol Inq 80(1):92–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heerwegh D, De Wit K, Verhoeven JC (2016) Exploring the reported ICT skill levels of undergraduate science students. J Inf Technol Educ: Res 15:19–47.  https://doi.org/10.28945/2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hohlfeld TN, Ritzhaupt AD, Barron AE (2013) Are gender differences in perceived and demonstrated technology literacy significant? It depends on the model. Educ Technol Res Dev 61(4):639–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffrey L, Hegarty B, Kelly O, Penman M, Coburn D, McDonald J (2011) Developing digital information literacy in higher education: obstacles and supports. J Inf Technol Educ 10:383–413Google Scholar
  19. Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(2):193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Madigan EM, Goodfellow M, Stone JA (2007) Gender, perceptions, and reality: technological literacy among first-year students. In: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. ACM, New York, pp 410–414Google Scholar
  21. Mansur F, Cakmak EK (2016) A study for determining the variables having impact on health manager’s acceptance and use of technology: example of Ankara province. Int J Health Manag Tour 1(2):37–55. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ijhmt/Google Scholar
  22. Marangunić N, Granić A (2015) Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc 14:81–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McMahon G (2009) Critical thinking and ICT integration in a Western Australian Secondary School. Educ Technol Soc 12(4):269–281Google Scholar
  24. Nair I, Das VM (2011) Analysis of recent studies undertaken for assessing acceptance of technology among teachers using TAM. Int J Comput Appl 32(8):38–45Google Scholar
  25. O’Brien JA, Marakas GM (2009) Management information systems, 9th edn. McGraw Hill Irwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Papanastasiou EC, Zembylas M, Vrasidas C (2005) An examination of the Pisa database to explore the relationship between computer use and science achievement. Educ Res Eval 11(6):529–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salajan FD, Schönwetter DJ, Cleghorn BM (2010) Student and faculty inter-generational digital divide: fact or fiction. Comput Educ 55(3):1393–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vekiri I (2010) Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences. Comput Educ 54(4):941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vekiri I, Chronaki A (2008) Gender issues in technology use: perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Comput Educ 51(3):1392–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verhoeven JC, Heerwegh D, De Wit K (2010) Information and communication technologies in the life of university freshmen: an analysis of change. Comput Educ 55(1):53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Verhoeven JC, Heerwegh D, De Wit K (2016) ICT learning experience and research orientation as predictors of ICT skills and the ICT use of university students. Educ Inf Technol 21(1):71–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9310-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vermunt J (1994) Scoring key for the inventory of learning styles (ILS) in higher education. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams MD, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK (2015) The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. J Enterp Inf Manag 28(3):443–488.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao L, Lu Y, Huang W, Wang Q (2010) Internet inequality: the relationship between high school students’ Internet. Comput Educ 55(4):1405–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zwass V (2019) Information system. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from https://academic.eb.com/levels/collegiate/article/informationsystem/126502

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sociological ResearchKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Janssen Pharmaceutica (Johnson & Johnson)BeerseBelgium
  3. 3.Education Policy Office, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bill Davey
    • 1
  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia