Advertisement

Teacher Learning and Technology-Enhanced Teacher Education

  • Nora BenittEmail author
  • Torben Schmidt
  • Michael K. Legutke
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Technology and the advancement of digital media not only have the potential to change the way we learn languages, but also the way foreign language teachers learn to teach. Setting up and managing learning platforms, using learning software and educational apps effectively, designing complex web-based tasks, and using videoconferencing in the scope of cooperation projects are just a few examples of digital media use in the foreign language instruction of today’s technology-rich schools. However, in order for teachers to become competent, critical, and reflective users of information and communication technology (ICT) in and beyond the foreign language classroom, they need to develop knowledge, a certain set of skills, and a positive attitude toward digital media use – a learning process that ideally should start early in pre-service teacher education. Moreover, teachers need to continuously challenge and rethink traditional teacher and learner roles in technology-supported teaching and learning settings. The chapter aims at answering the question of what types of knowledge and skills pre-service language teachers need to acquire in order to become digitally literate. Following an overview of current approaches in technology education, course formats and pedagogical models conducive to a meaningful integration of theory and practice in teacher education that adequately prepare pre-service teachers for competent technology use in the foreign language classroom will be discussed. After a review of current research on key concepts and approaches to the development of pre-service teachers’ digital literacies, the chapter concludes with a framework for successful technology education of language teachers comprising aspects from the models and key concepts considered here.

Keywords

Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) Computer literacy Digital literacy Foreign language teacher education Information and communication technology (ICT) Media literacy Teacher learning Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) 

References

  1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2013) ACTFL’s Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/CAEP/ACTFLCAEPStandards2013_v2015.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2017
  2. Arnold N (2017) Technology and second language teacher professional development. In: Thorne SL, May S (eds) Language, education and technology, Encyclopedia of language and education. Springer International, Cham, pp 261–273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold N, Ducate L (2015) Contextualized views of practices and competencies in CALL teacher education research. Lang Learn Technol 19(1):1–9. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/commentary.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  4. Benitt N, Schmidt T (2016) Lehrerbildung – besser interaktiv? Videokonferenzen als digitale Brücke zwischen Theorie und Praxis in der Englischlehrerausbildung. In: Zeyer T, Stuhlmann S, Jones RD (eds) Interaktivität beim Fremdsprachenlehren und -lernen mit digitalen Medien: Hip oder Hype? Narr, Tübingen, pp 259–283Google Scholar
  5. BMBF Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2015) Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung. https://www.bmbf.de/de/qualitaetsoffensive-lehrerbildung-525.html. Accessed 19 Sept 2017
  6. Bos W, Eickelmann B, Gerick J, Goldhammer F, Schaumburg H, Schwippert K, Senkbeil M, Schulz-Zander R, Wendt H (2014) ICILS 2013. Computer-und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in der 8. Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich. Waxmann, Münster. http://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2015/11459. Accessed 28 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  7. Bos W, Lorenz R, Endberg M, Eickelmann B, Kammerl R, Welling S (eds) (2016) Schule digital – der Länderindikator 2016: Kompetenzen von Lehrpersonen der Sekundarstufe I im Umgang mit digitalen Medien im Bundesländervergleich. Waxmann, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckingham D (2006) Defining digital literacy – what do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic J Digit Lit 1(4):263–276Google Scholar
  9. Chai C-S, Koh JH-L, Tsai C-C (2013) A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educ Technol Soc 16(2):31–51Google Scholar
  10. Çiftçi E, Savaş P (2017) The role of telecollaboration in language and intercultural learning: a synthesis of studies published between 2010 and 2015. ReCALL 30:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desimone LM (2009) Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educ Res 38(3):181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudeney G (2007) The internet and the language classroom. A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudeney G, Hockly N, Pegrum M (2013) Digital literacies. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  14. Eickelmann B, Vennemann M (2017) Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. Eur Educ Res J 16(1):28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117725899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein S (1990) Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: Pervin LA (ed) Handbook of personality, theory and research. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 165–192Google Scholar
  16. Freeman D, Johnson K (1998) Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Q 32:397–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grgurović M, Chapelle C, Shelley M (2013) A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL 25(2):165–198.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guichon N (2009) Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL 21(2):166–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hampel R, Stickler U (2005) New skills for new classrooms: training tutors to teach languages online. Comput Assist Lang Learn 18(4):311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauck M, Kurek M (2017) Digital literacies in teacher preparation. In: Thorne SL, May S (eds) Language, education and technology, Encyclopedia of language and education. Springer International, Cham, pp 275–287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Healey D, Hegelheimer V, Hubbard P, Iannou-Georgiou S, Ware P, Kessler G (2008) TESOL technology standards framework. https://www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/books/bk_technologystandards_framework_721.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2017
  22. Herring MC, Koehler MJ, Mishra P (2016) Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, London.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirsch R (1979) Einstellungswandel und Praxisschock bei jungen Lehrern. Eine empirische Längsschnittuntersuchung. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobbs R, Jensen A (2009) The past, present and future of media literacy education. J Media Lit Educ 1(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO J 25(2):175–188Google Scholar
  26. Hubbard P, Levy M (2006) The scope of CALL education. In: Hubbard P, Levy M (eds) Teacher education in CALL. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Initiative D21 (2016) Sonderstudie »Schule Digital« Lehrwelt, Lernwelt, Lebenswelt: Digitale Bildung im Dreieck SchülerInnen-Eltern-Lehrkräfte. htttps://initiatived21.de/app/uploads/2017/01/d21_schule_digital2016.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  28. Jarvis W, Achilleos M (2013) From computer assisted language learning (CALL) to mobile assisted language use (MALU). TESL-EJ 16(4):1–18Google Scholar
  29. Kelly M, Grenfell M, Allan R, Kriza C, McEvoy W (2004) European profile for language teacher education – a frame of reference. http://edz.bib.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-b/gdbk/04/spr/European_profile_frame_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2017
  30. Kim C, Kim MK, Lee C, Spector M, DeMeester K (2013) Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teach Teach Educ 29:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kommer S, Biermann R (2012) Der mediale Habitus von (angehenden) LehrerInnen: Medienbezogene Dispositionen und Medienhandeln von Lehramtsstudierenden. In: Schulz-Zander R, Eickelmann B, Moser H, Niesyto H, Grell P (eds) Jahrbuch Medienpädagogik 9, vol 9. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Korthagen FAJ (2016) Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teach Teach.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
  33. Korthagen FAJ, Kessels JPAM (1999) Linking theory and practice: changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educ Res 28(4):4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Korthagen FAJ, Kessels J, Koster B, Lagerwerf B, Wubbels T (2001) Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  35. Krumsvik, RJ, Jones LØ (2013) Teachers’ digital competence in upper secondary school: (work in progress). In: ICICTE 2013 proceedings, pp 171–183. http://www.icicte.org/Proceedings2013/Papers%202013/05-1-Krumsvik.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2017
  36. Kurek M, Müller-Hartmann A (2017) Tasks design for collaborative exchanges: in search of new criteria. System 64:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lanier J, Little JW (1986) Research in teacher education. In: Wittrock MC (ed) Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 527–560Google Scholar
  38. Lankshear C, Knobel M (2006) Digital literacy and digital literacies: policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic J Digit Lit 1(1):12–23Google Scholar
  39. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,UK/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Legutke MK, Müller-Hartmann A, Schocker-von Ditfurth M (2007) Preparing teachers for technology-supported ELT. In: Cummins J, Davison C (eds) International handbook of English language teaching. Springer, New York, pp 1125–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lipowsky F (2014) Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfort- und Weiterbildung. In: Terhart E, Bennewitz H, Rothland M (eds) Handbuch der Forschung zur Lehrerbildung. Waxmann, Münster, pp 511–541Google Scholar
  42. Liu MH, Kleinsasser RC (2015) Exploring EFL teachers’ CALL knowledge and competencies: in-service program perspectives. Lang Learn Technol 19(1):119–138. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/liukleinsasser.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  43. Mishra P, Koehler MJ (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec 108(8):1017–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Müller-Hartmann A (2006) Learning how to teach intercultural communicative competence via telecollaboration: a model for language teacher education. In: Belz JA, Thorne SL (eds) Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Thomson & Heinle, Boston, pp 63–84Google Scholar
  45. Murray D, Christison MA (2017) Online language teacher education. Participants’ experiences and perspectives. TIRF: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. https://www.tirfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TIRF_OLTE_2017_Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2017
  46. Nawaz A, Kundi GM (2010) Digital literacy: an analysis of the contemporary paradigms. Int J Sci Technol Educ Res 1(2):19–29Google Scholar
  47. Newby D, Allan R, Fenner A, Jones B, Komorowska H, Soghikyan K (2007) European portfolio for student teachers of languages: a reflection tool for language teacher education. http://www.ecml.at/epostl. Accessed 25 Sept 2017
  48. O’Dowd R (2015) Supporting in-service language educators in learning to telecollaborate. Lang Learn Technol 19(1):64–83. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/odowd.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  49. O’Dowd R (2018) From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: state-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. J Virtual Exch 1:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1. Accessed 17 May 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oser F, Oelkers J (2001) Die Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildungssysteme. Von der Allrounderausbildung zur Ausbildung professioneller Standards. Chur, Zürich: RüeggerGoogle Scholar
  51. Polly D, Brantley-Dias L (2009) TPACK: where do we go now? TechTrends 53(5):46–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0324-4. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  52. Polly D, Mims C, Shepherd CE, Inan F (2010) Evidence of impact: transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teach Teach Educ 26:863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Potter WJ (2014) Media literacy. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  54. Reinders H (2009) Technology and second language teacher education. In: Burns A, Richards JC (eds) The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 230–237Google Scholar
  55. Reinhard S (2009) Gelingende Lehrerbildung – Professionstheorie und Fachdidaktik, Erfahrungen und Konsequenzen. J Soc Sci Educ 2:23–31Google Scholar
  56. Røkenes JC, Mørk F, Krumsvik, RJ (2014) Development of student teachers’ digital competence in teacher education. A literature review. Nordic J Digit Lit 9(4):250–280. ISSN Online: 1891-943X https://www.idunn.no/dk/2014/04/development_of_student_teachers_digital_competence_in_teac. Accessed 26 Dec 2017
  57. Schmid U, Goertz L, Radomski S, Thom S, Behrens J (2017) Monitor Digitale Bildung: Die Hochschulen im digitalen Zeitalter. Bertelsmann Stiftung, GüterslohGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt T, Strasser T (2016) Digital classroom. Der Fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch 144(50):2–7Google Scholar
  59. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Shulman LS (1998) Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. Elem Sch J 98:511–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stockwell G (2012) Computer-assisted language learning. Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tai S-JD (2015) From TPACK-in-action workshops to classrooms: CALL competency developed and integrated. Lang Learn Technol 19(1):139–164. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/tai.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2017Google Scholar
  63. Tremp P (2015) Von Hochschullehrern, akademischer Lehre und Lehrerbildnerinnen: Über einige Erwartungen und Zumutungen. In: Villiger C, Trautwein U (eds) Zwischen Theorie und Praxis – Ansprüche und Möglichkeiten in der Lehrer(innen)bildung. Waxmann, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  64. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2011) Transforming education: the power of ICT policies. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002118/211842e.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2017
  65. Vogel T, Meyer-Menk J (1999) Zum Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis in der universitären Lehrerausbildung für berufliche Schulen. Berufsbildung – Zeitschrift für Praxis und Theorie in Betrieb und Schule 58:36–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nora Benitt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Torben Schmidt
    • 1
  • Michael K. Legutke
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of English StudiesLeuphana UniversityLüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Justus-Liebig-University GießenGießenGermany

Personalised recommendations