Advertisement

Action Research in English Language Teaching: Contributions and Recent Developments

  • Anne BurnsEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Action research, as part of a more general movement toward “teacher research,” has become increasingly prevalent in the field of English language teaching (ELT) over the last two decades. It can be considered as a form of professional learning for language teachers which takes a socioconstructivist approach in which teachers are seen as agentive actors within their own social contexts. After providing an account of the conceptual features of action research and a brief overview of its origins, this chapter considers how it relates to other forms of research in ELT. It outlines the development of action research within the field of English language teaching. It then considers what various studies have shown about the impact of conducting action research on teachers. The chapter also considers some of the more recent initiatives that have contributed to the spread of this form of research in the field of English language teaching.

Keywords

Action research Teacher research Language teaching Professional development Teacher education 

References

  1. Allwright D (1988) Observation in the language classroom. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwright D (1997) Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Q 31(2):368–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allwright D, Bailey K (1991) Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Allwright D, Hanks J (2009) The developing language learner: an introduction to exploratory practice. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson GL, Herr K, Nihlen AS (1994) Studying your own school: an educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Corwin Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. Argyris C, Schön D (1991) Participatory action research and action science compared: a commentary. In: Whyte WF (ed) Participatory action science. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Auerbach E (1994) Participatory action research. TESOL Q 28(4):693–697Google Scholar
  8. Bailey K (1998) Approaches to empirical research in instructional settings. In: Byrnes H (ed) Perspectives in research and scholarship in second language teaching. The Modern Language Association of America, New York, pp 123–178Google Scholar
  9. Bailey K (2001) Action research, teacher research, and classroom research in language teaching. In: Celce-Murcia M (ed) Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3rd edn. Heinle & Heinle, Boston, pp 489–498Google Scholar
  10. Bailey K, Omaggio-Hadley A, Magnan S, Swaffer J (1991) Research in the 1990s: focus on theory building, instructional innovation and collaboration. Foreign Lang Ann 24:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett CK (1993) Teacher-researchers: all dressed up and no place to go? Educ Leadersh 51(2):69–70Google Scholar
  12. Borg S (2013) Teacher research in language teaching. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Borg S (2015) Professional development through the Cambridge English/English UK Action Research Scheme. Res Notes 61:3–5Google Scholar
  14. Breen MP, Candlin CN (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Appl Linguis 1:89–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brindley G (1990) Towards a research agenda for TESOL. Prospect 6(1):7–26Google Scholar
  16. Brumfit C, Mitchell R (1989) The language classroom as a focus for research. In: Brumfit C, Mitchell R (eds) Research in the language classroom. ELT Documents 133. Modern English Publications and The British Council, London, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  17. Burns A (1999) Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Burns A (2007) Action research: contributions and future directions in ELT. In: Cummins J, Davison C (eds) The international handbook of English language teaching. Springer, New York, pp 987–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burns A (2010) Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide for practitioners. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Burns A (2011) Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In: Hinkel E (ed) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, vol II. Routledge, New York, pp 237–253Google Scholar
  21. Burns A (in press) Action research: developments, characteristics and future directions. In: Benati A, Schwieter JW (eds) The Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Burns A, Khalifa H (eds) (2017) Second language assessment and action research. SiLT series. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Burns A, Dikilitaş K, Smith R, Wyatt M (eds) (2017) Developing insights into teacher-research. IATEFL, Faversham. Downloadable from http://resig.weebly.com/developing-insights-into-teacher-research.htmlGoogle Scholar
  24. Castro Garcés AY, Martínez Granada L (2016) The role of collaborative action research in teachers’ professional development. Profile Issues Teach Prof Dev 18(1):39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coghlan D, Shani AB (eds) (2016) Action research in business and management. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Collier J (1945) United States Indian administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Soc Res 12(3):265–303Google Scholar
  27. Cortina-Pérez B, Solano-Tenorio L-M (2013) The effect of using out-of-class contexts on EFL learners: an action research. Calidoscópio 11(2):167–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cumming A (1994) Alternatives in TESOL research: descriptive, interpretive and ideological orientations. TESOL Q 28(4):673–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dana NF, Yendol-Hoppey D (2008) The reflective educator’s guide to professional development: coaching inquiry-oriented learning communities. Corwin Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  30. Denos C, Toohey K, Neilson K, Waterstone B (2009) Collaborative research in multilingual classrooms. Multilingual Matters, BristolGoogle Scholar
  31. Dörnyei Z (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Edge J (ed) (2001) Action research. TESOL, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  33. Edge J, Richards K (eds) (1993) Teachers develop teachers’ research. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Farrell TSC (2018) Research on reflective practice in TESOL. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Freeman D (1998) Doing teacher research: from inquiry to understanding. Heinle & Heinle, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Gass S, Mackey A, Ross-Feldman L (2011) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Lang Learn 61:189–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Graves K (1996) Teachers as course developers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grundy S (1987) Curriculum: product or praxis. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Halsey AH (ed) (1972) Educational priority. Volume 1. E. P.A. Problems and policies. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Jarvis S (2002a) Research in TESOL Part I. TESOL Res Interest Sect Newsl 8(3):1–2Google Scholar
  41. Jarvis S (2002b) Research in TESOL Part II. TESOL Res Interest Sect Newsl 9(1):1–2Google Scholar
  42. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1982) The action research reader. Deakin University Press, GeelongGoogle Scholar
  43. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1988a) The action research planner, 3rd edn. Deakin University Press, GeelongGoogle Scholar
  44. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1988b) The action research reader, 3rd edn. Deakin University Press, GeelongGoogle Scholar
  45. Koshy E, Koshy V, Waterman H (2011) Action research in healthcare. Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Hum Relat II:142–153Google Scholar
  47. Long M (1983) Training the second language teacher as classroom researcher. In: Alatis JE, Stern HH, Strevens P (eds) Applied linguistics and the preparation of teachers: towards a rationale. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 281–297Google Scholar
  48. Marrow A (1969) The practical theorist: the life and work of Kurt Lewin. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Masters J (2000) The history of action research. Retrieved 5 Oct 2002 from http://casino.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow//arer/00
  50. Mathew R, Eapen RL, Tharu J (eds) (2000) The language curriculum: dynamics of change, Vol 1. The outsider perspective. Report of the International Seminar 1995. Central Institute for English and Foreign Language Studies, Orient Longman, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  51. Maurer M, Githens RP (2010) Toward a reframing of action research for human resource and organization development: moving beyond problem solving and toward dialogue. Action Res 8:267–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McPherson P (1997) Action research: exploring learner diversity. Prospect 12(1):50–62Google Scholar
  53. McTaggart R (1991) Action research. A short modern history. Deakin University Press, GeelongGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller J (1990) Creating spaces and finding voices: teachers collaborating for empowerment. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  55. Nunan D (1989) Understanding language classrooms: a guide for teacher-initiated action. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Nunan D (1997) Developing standards for teacher-research in TESOL. TESOL Q 31(2):365–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nunan D, Bailey KM (2009) Exploring second language classroom research. Heinle/Cengage Learning, BostonGoogle Scholar
  58. Richards JC, Nunan D (eds) (1990) Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwab J (1969) College curricula and student protest. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith R, Connelly T, Robolledo P (2014) Teacher research as continuing professional development: a project with Chilean secondary school teachers. In: Hayes D (ed) Innovations in the continuing professional development of English language teachers. British Council, London, pp 111–132Google Scholar
  61. Stenhouse L (1971) The humanities curriculum project: the rationale. Theory Pract X(3):154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tinker-Sachs G (2002) Action research. Fostering and furthering effective practices in the teaching of English. City University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  63. Toohey K (1998) “Breaking them up, taking them away”: ESL students in Grade 1. TESOL Q 32(1):61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Lier L (1988) The classroom and the language learner. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. van Lier L (1994) Action research. Sintagma 6:31–37Google Scholar
  66. van Lier L (2011) Language learning: an ecological-semiotic approach. In: Hinkel E (ed) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, vol II. Routledge, New York, pp 383–394Google Scholar
  67. Verduin J (1967) Cooperative curriculum improvement. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  68. Wallace M (1991) Training foreign language teachers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Wallace M (1998) Action research for language teachers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang Q (2002) Action research for English teachers. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  71. Winter R, Munn-Giddings C (2001) A handbook for action research in health and social care. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations