Advertisement

English for Specific Purposes: Some Influences and Impacts

  • Ken Hyland
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The field of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) addresses the communicative needs and practices of particular professional or occupational groups. It draws its strength from an eclectic theoretical foundation and a commitment to research-based language education, which seeks to reveal the constraints of social contexts on language use and the ways learners can gain control over these. In other words, it challenges the theory-practice divide and makes visible academic and professional genres to students. In this chapter, I briefly point to some of the major ideas and practices that influence ESP, focusing on needs analysis, ethnography, critical approaches, intercultural rhetoric, social constructionism, and discourse analysis. I then go on to look briefly at some of the effects ESP has had on language teaching and research, arguing that it has encouraged teachers to highlight discourse rather than language, to adopt a research orientation to their work, to employ collaborative pedagogies, to be aware of discourse variation, and to consider the wider political implications of their role. Together these features of ESP practice emphasize a situated view of literacy and underline the applied nature of the field.

Keywords

Needs analysis Genre Teachers as researchers Social constructionism 

References

  1. Arnó-Macià E, Mancho-Barés G (2015) The role of content and language in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at university: challenges and implications for ESP. Engl Specif Purp 37:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhtin M (1986) Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron C (2002) Problem-solving and EAP: themes and issues in a collaborative teaching venture. English for Specific Purposes 22: 297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton D, Hamilton M (1998) Local literacies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazerman C (1988) Shaping written knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  6. Becher T, Trowler P (2001) Academic tribes and territories: intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. SRHE and Open University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  7. Benesch S (2001) Critical English for academic purposes: theory, politics and practice. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  8. Benesch S (2009) Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes. J Engl Acad Purp 8:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia VK (1993) Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bocanegra-Valle A (2016) In: Hyland K, Shaw P (eds) Needs analysis for curriculum design. Routledge, Oxford, pp 562–577Routledge handbook of EAPGoogle Scholar
  11. Braine G (1995) Writing in the natural sciences and engineering. In: Belcher D, Braine G (eds) Academic writing in a second language: essays on research and pedagogy. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng A (2006) Analysing and enacting academic criticism: the case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing. J Second Lang Writ 15:279–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connor U (2008) Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: reaching to intercultural rhetoric. In: Connor U, Nagelhout E, Rozycki W (eds) Contrastive rhetoric: reaching to intercultural rhetoric, vol 169. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davison C (2006) Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: how do we know when we are doing it right? Int J Biling Educ Biling 9(4):454–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dressen-Hammouda D (2013). Ethnographic approaches to ESP research) In: Paltridge B, Starfield S (eds) The handbook of English for specific purposes. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp 502–517Google Scholar
  16. Dudley-Evans T, St. John M-J (1998) Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Durrant P (2014) Discipline- and level-specificity in university students’ written vocabulary. Appl Linguis 35(3):328–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenton-Smith B (2014) The place of Benesch’s critical English for academic purposes in the current practice of academic language and learning. J Acad Lang Learn 8(3):A23–A33Google Scholar
  19. Gilbert G, Mulkay M (1984) Opening Pandora's box: a sociological analysis of scientific discourse. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Gimenez J (2009) Beyond the academic essay: discipline-specific writing in nursing and midwifery. J Engl Acad Purp 7(3):151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gollin S (1999) Why? I thought we’d talked about it before: collaborative writing in a professional workplace setting. In: Candlin CN, Hyland K (eds) Writing: texts, processes and practices. Longman, London, pp 267–290Google Scholar
  22. Halliday MAK, Matthiessen C (2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Routledge, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halliday M, MacIntosh A, Strevens P (1964) The linguistic sciences and language teaching. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris J (1989) The idea of a discourse community in the study of writing. College Compos Commun 40:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinkel E (ed) (2005) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  26. Holliday A (1994) Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Horowitz DM (1986) What professors actually require: academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Q 20(3):445–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutchison T, Waters A (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hyland K (2002) Genre: language, context and literacy. In: McGroaty M (ed) Annual review of applied linguistics, vol 22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 113–135Google Scholar
  30. Hyland K (2003) Genre-based pedagogies: a social response to process. J Second Lang Writ 12(1):17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hyland K (2004) Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  32. Hyland K (2006) English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyland K (2012) Undergraduate understandings: stance and voice in final year reports. In: Hyland K, Sancho Guinda C (eds) Stance and voice in academic writing. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hyland K (2015) Re-imagining literacy: English in Hong Kong’s new university curriculum. In: Conium D (ed) English language education and assessment: recent developments in Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland. Springer, London, pp 139–154Google Scholar
  35. Hyland K (2016) General and specific EAP. In: Hyland K, Shaw P (eds) Routledge handbook of EAP. Routledge, London, pp 17–29Google Scholar
  36. Johns AM (1997) Text, role and context: developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaplan RB (1966) Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Lang Learn 16(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keck C (2014) Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: a re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. J Second Lang Writ 25:4–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Latour B, Woolgar S (1979) Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  40. Leki I (2007) Undergraduates in a second language: challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  41. Lillis T, Curry MJ (2010) Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Macallister CJ (2016) Critical perspectives. In: Hyland K, Shaw P (eds) The Routledge handbook of EAP. Routledge, London, pp 283–293Google Scholar
  43. Mead GH (1934/2055) Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Moreno AI (1998) The explicit signalling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: a contrastive framework. Text 18:545–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgan B (2009) Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: possibilities and challenges. J Engl Acad Purp 8:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Munby J (1978) Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers G (1990) Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  48. Nesi H, Gardner S (2012) Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Paltridge B, Starfield S (2011) Research in English for specific purposes. In: Hinkel E (ed) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, vol 2. Routledge, London, pp 106–121Google Scholar
  50. Paltridge B, Starfield S, Tardy C (2016) Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Pennycook A (1997) Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism and EAP. Engl Specif Purp 16:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Phillipson R (2012) Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Porter J (1992) Audience and rhetoric: an archaeological composition of the discourse community. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  54. Schouten BC, Meeuwesen L (2006) Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 64(1–3):21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw P (2016) Genre analysis. In: Hyland K, Shaw P (eds) The Routledge handbook of EAP. Routledge, London, pp 244–256Google Scholar
  56. Siepmann D (2006) Academic writing and culture: an overview of differences between English, French and German. Meta 511:131–150.  https://doi.org/10.7202/012998arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Starfield S (2015) Ethnographic research. In: Paltridge B, Phakiti A (eds) Research methods in applied linguistics. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Stubbs M (1996) Text and corpus analysis. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Swales J (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Swales J (1998) Other floors, other voices: a textography of a small university building. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  61. Swales J (2001) EAP-related linguistic research: an intellectual history. In: Flowerdew J, Peacock M (eds) Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trimble L (1985) English for science and technology. Newbury House, RowleyGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner J (2004) Language as academic purpose. J Engl Acad Purp 3:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Upton TA (2012) LSP at 50: looking back, looking forward. Ibérica 23:9–28Google Scholar
  65. Ventola E (1992) Writing scientific English: overcoming cultural problems. Int J Appl Linguist 2(2):191–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of East AngliaNorwichEngland

Personalised recommendations