Advertisement

The Role of Innovation in Structural Change, Economic Development, and the Labor Market

Living reference work entry
First Online:
  • 246 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter reviews the theory and broad empirical evidence of how skill-biased technical change, structural change, and development interact with each other, with the ultimate aim to derive conclusions about inequality related to how different skills are rewarded in the labor market. It is argued that the adoption and adaptation of foreign knowledge leads to structural change along the development path. The analysis also shows that sectors differ very much in terms of their skill intensity, which will likely lead to a changing role of skill-biased technical change over the development path. In particular, technical change biased in favor of high- and medium-skilled labor plays an important role in the early stages of development (roughly until middle-income level). After middle-income levels, biased technical change is overshadowed by an increasing supply of medium- and high-skilled labor. This implies that until about middle-income level, inequality between skill levels increases and after middle-income level, the skill premiums decline, thus leading to more equality in the labor market. This suggests that education plays a role both as a development policy and as a form of social protection policy (the latter mainly during later stages of the development process).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abramovitz MA (1986) Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. J Econ Hist 46:385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramovitz MA (1989) Thinking about growth and other essays on economic growth and welfare. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acemoglu D (2000) Technical change, inequality and the labor market. NBER working paper no. 7800. NBER, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: Card D, Ashenfelter O (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 4b. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1043–1171Google Scholar
  5. Alvaredo F, Chancel L, Piketty T, Saez E, Zucman G (2017) World inequality report 2018. World Inequality Lab. https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf
  6. Autor D, Dorn D (2013) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. Labor Market. Am Econ Rev 103:1553–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autor D, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118:1279–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chenery HB, Robinson S, Syrquin M (1986) Industrialisation and growth. A comparative study. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Fagerberg J (1994) Technology and international differences in economic growth: a comparative study. J Econ Lit XXXII:1147–1175Google Scholar
  10. Foster-McGregor N, Verspagen B (2016) The role of structural change in the economic development of Asian economies. Asian Dev Rev 33:74–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster-McGregor N, Nomaler Ö, Verspagen B, van Zon A (2019) Structural change, economic development and the labor market. In: Foster-McGregor N, Alcorta L, Szirmai A, Verspagen B (eds) New perspectives on structural change: causes and consequences of structural change in the global economy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerschenkron A (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Goos M, Manning A, Salomons A (2009) The polarization of the European labor market. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 99:58–63Google Scholar
  15. Jasso G (2015) Inequality analysis: overview. In: Wright JD (ed) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee E, Vivarelli M (2006) The social impact of globalization in developing countries. Int Labor Rev 145:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsuyama K (2009) Structural change in an interdependent world: a global view of manufacturing decline. J Eur Econ Assoc 7:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pasinetti L (1981) Structural change and economic growth – a theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of the nations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Robbins D (1996) HOS hits facts: facts win; evidence on trade and wages in the developing world. OECD technical paper 119. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Robbins D, Gindling TH (1999) Trade liberalization and the relative wages for more-skilled workers in Costa Rica. Rev Dev Econ 3:140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Szirmai A (2015) Socio-economic development. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tregenna F (2016) Deindustrialization and premature deindustrialization. In: Handbook of alternative theories of economic development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 710–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Verspagen B (1991) A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 2:359–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vivarelli M (2014) Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: a survey of economic literature. J Econ Issues 48:123–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNU-MERITMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marco Vivarelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economic PolicyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations

Cite entry