Advertisement

Skill-Sets for Prospective Careers of Highly Qualified Labor

  • Natalia Shmatko
  • Leonid Gokhberg
  • Dirk MeissnerEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Until recently, the career prospects of engineers and researchers have changed considerably. The chances of getting a permanent job, of getting a good position at a university or research center depend not only on one’s academic degree but also on individuals’ experience, competencies, and portfolio. Skills received during the period of study at the university or dissertation research can no longer be considered as sufficient for career. Lifelong learning is becoming the dominant model and should become an integral part of all career plans by means of constantly updating and developing the individuals’ “portfolio of competencies.” At the same time, successful companies should focus not on the staff but on the organizational stock skills, i.e., the aggregate “portfolio of competencies” of employees with different professions, which allows the company to formulate for specific tasks and projects different sets of competencies required in each specific case.

The chapter analyzes the most in-demand and dynamically changing sets of competencies in two high-tech areas – robotics and biotechnology.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The book chapter is based on the study funded by the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”

References

  1. Center for European Economic Research (2017) Digitalisation boosts labour demand in Europe. http://www.zew.de/en/presse/pressearchiv/digitaler-wandel-kurbelt-nachfrage-nach-arbeitskraeften-in-europa-an/. Accessed 21 Feb 2018
  2. Davenport TH, Patil DJ (2012) Data scientist. Har Bus Rev 90(5):70–76Google Scholar
  3. De Filippo D, Sanz Casado E, Gomez I (2009) Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: a case study of a Spanish university. Res Eval 18(3):191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deloitte (2017) The megatrends of tomorrow’s world. Deloitte Consulting GmbH, München. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/public-sector/deloitte-nl-ps-megatrends-2ndedition.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2019Google Scholar
  5. Dezhina I, Ponomarev A (2014) Advanced manufacturing: new emphasis in industrial development. Foresight-Russia 8(2):16–29Google Scholar
  6. Edler J, Fier H, Grimpe C (2011) International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Res Policy 40(6):791–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gargiulo F, Carletti T (2014) Driving forces of researchers mobility. Sci Rep 4:4860Google Scholar
  8. Gartner (2018) 4 steps to develop digital dexterity in your workplace. Режим доступа: https://www.gartner.com/binaries/content/assets/events/keywords/digital-workplace/pcce13/4_steps-infographics-3.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2018
  9. Gekara VO, Nguyen VT (2018) New technologies and the transformation of work and skills: a study of computerisation and automation of Australian container terminals. N Technol Work Employ 33(3):219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gokhberg L, Kitova G, Kuznetsova T (2016) Russian researchers: professional values, remuneration and attitudes to science policy. In: Gokhberg L, Shmatko N, Auriol L (eds) The science and technology labor force: the value of doctorate holders and development of professional careers. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gokhberg L, Meissner D, Shmatko N (2017) Myths and realities of highly qualified labor and what it means for PhDs. J Knowl Econ 8:758–767.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0403-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heitor M, Horta H, Mendonça J (2014) Developing human capital and research capacity: science policies promoting brain gain technological forecasting and social change. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 82:6–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee HF, Miozzo M, Laredo P (2010) Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university. Res Policy 39(7):869–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee H, Miozzo M, Laredo P (2012) Job mobility of science and engineering PhDs: movers and stayers and implications for knowledge flows to industry. Paper for DRUID 2012, Copenhagen, 19–21 June 2012. Available: https://conference.druid.dk/acc_papers/fai70r8o69h3eoylev1x93ko6kd0.pdf
  15. Lethbridge TC (2000) What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer 33(5):44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Musselin C (2004) Towards a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. High Educ 48:55–78.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000033770.24848.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Science Board (2015) Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD (2016) Skills for a digital world. Policy brief on the future of work. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available: http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  19. Scellato G, Franzoni C, Stephan P (2017) A mobility boost for research. Science 356(6339):694.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shmatko N, Katchanov Y, Volkova G (2018) Research careers: conceptual frameworks and actual practices. WP BRP 87/STI/2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Shmatko
    • 1
  • Leonid Gokhberg
    • 1
  • Dirk Meissner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marco Vivarelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economic PolicyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations